Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Stochastic data processing and simulation TMS150

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-29 - 2012-11-07
Antal svar: 18
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 62%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 22%
Around 20 hours/week»7 38%
Around 25 hours/week»4 22%
Around 30 hours/week»3 16%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- skipped it» (At most 15 hours/week)
- Did not complete the course» (At most 15 hours/week)
- The workload was good except for the last week when the assignment was to close to exam week. » (Around 20 hours/week)
- The first lab took alot more time» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

18 svarande

0%»1 5%
25%»2 11%
50%»1 5%
75%»4 22%
100%»10 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

- skipped it» (0%)
- I had another lecture and after a couple of lectures I realised that my other lecture gave more. Very good lectures though.» (25%)
- Lectures was VERY good!» (100%)
- Vera is awesome!» (100%)
- The teaching was exceptionally good!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

18 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»6 33%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- Usually the goals for a course are not that relevant. It"s better to see how we are going to be examined» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- skipped it» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»14 93%
No, the goals are set too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

- skipped it» (?)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»12 80%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- skipped it» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»4 23%
Large extent»7 41%
Great extent»5 29%

Genomsnitt: 2.94

- skipped it» (?)
- I usually could not attend the lab times but help was just an e-mail away and Vera answered quickly.» (Some extent)
- *Applause and hats off to Vera*» (Great extent)
- The lectures were great and informative.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»7 43%
Large extent»7 43%
Great extent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.68

- skipped it» (?)
- I googled any questions regarding programming» (Some extent)
- I think only of the lecture notes/lab instructions.» (Large extent)
- The written material matched the teaching very well, nice!» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»7 41%
Very well»10 58%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

- skipped it» (?)
- The pdfs was not accessible whit out downloading, maybe some page fault. » (Rather well)
- Might be easier for Vera if we hand in reports in ping pong» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

18 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 27%
Very good»12 66%
I did not seek help»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- The last lab, which was among the hardest, took place after all the lab slots which meant we had to find Vera at her office to ask questions.» (Rather good)
- Vera answered e-mail quickly» (Very good)
- Vera is very nice. » (Very good)
- skipped it» (I did not seek help)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

18 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»3 16%
Rather well»1 5%
Very well»12 66%
I did not seek cooperation»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- I fell behind and did not have anyone else doing the same assignment as me.» (Rather well)
- skipped it» (I did not seek cooperation)

11. How was the course workload?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»10 58%
High»5 29%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- skipped it» (?)
- The first lab took alot of time. Perhaps one could do just one of the two tasks. The difficulty was not the statistical bit but to learn two and a half new programming languages.» (Adequate)
- Very high but not "too high".» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»9 56%
High»6 37%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

- skipped it» (?)
- It took some time but there was no exam in this course» (Adequate)
- I took Kvantfysik as my other course» (Adequate)
- I am not studying TM3 and this question is therefore silly, since it depends on what I do.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 5%
Adequate»1 5%
Good»7 41%
Excellent»8 47%

Genomsnitt: 4.29 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- skipped it» (?)
- If there could be less hand ins and more discussion whit the teacher to show understanding it would be really nice. copy paste of code dont give much learning. » (Good)
- I got to learn some programming and how to apply statistics. This was much better for me than a course in pure C which I would never take.» (Excellent)
- One of the best courses so far, both in subject matter and execution. Interesting topics and useful skills practiced. » (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Vera, the labs, the languages»
- Project form of the course, the broad scope of subjects and programming environments.»
- Veras utomordentliga föreläsningar.»
- Everything was good, nothing has to change.»
- skipped it»
- Vera»
- The examination»
- The lectrures whit notes. »
- Lectures»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Perhaps a smaller lab 1 since it takes alot of time to learn the different languages»
- The time to recieve a return was a bit long towards the end of the course. Perhaps additional deadlines could level out the work load for the teacher correcting reports?»
- One could consider other ways of handing in the labs - maybe writing one or two reports and show the other labs on the computer.»
- skipped it»
- The lack of deadlines, or at least add recommended deadlines. »
- The amount of hand ins. Fewer but whit more focus on understanding would be nice. »

16. Additional comments

- Very good course which I will recommend others to take!»
- skipped it»
- Nice course»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.29

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.29
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.82

Kursutvärderingssystem från