Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Introduction to engineering mathematics TMA325
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-10-29 - 2012-11-07 Antal svar: 4 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50% Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.4 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 2 | | 50% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 2 | | 50% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.5 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 4 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 2 | | 50% |
100%» | | 2 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.5
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?4 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 4 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 4 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.4 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 1 | | 25% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 3 | | 75% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.75 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?4 svarande
No, not at all» | | 1 | | 25% |
To some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, definitely» | | 3 | | 75% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - Examination as report did not include knowledge of Matlab and LaTeX. Matlab solutions were ALMOST COMPLETELY given with the tasks and the report could also be written with any other text program as the *.tex file was not examined.» (No, not at all)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?4 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?4 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 75% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 - As solutions to the tasks have already been given.» (Great extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?4 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 25% |
Very well» | | 3 | | 75% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?3 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 100% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?4 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 50% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 50% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 11. How was the course workload?4 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 25% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 75% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 12. How was the total workload this study period?4 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 100% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?4 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 2 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- There should be more encouragement for the students to do the latex part of the course earlier including one session for them to write the first studio under the supervision of the teacher.»
- I"d suggest that Matlab skills should be included in examination, which means that lesser solutions should be already given.
Also include *.tex file in examination and not just the pdf report as some students may not have used (at least talked about) LaTeX. There are many other possibilities in writing a document with any text editor and make it look like the result of an LaTeX work.»
16. Additional comments- What is required in the report should be more clearly specified. For instance I did not know we need to come up with a detailed design of the shape of the tank until the presentation. It is is not documented in the lab instructions at all.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.5
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.5 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.87
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|