Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Introduction to nuclear reactors TIF215

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-29 - 2012-11-07
Antal svar: 21
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 65%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

21 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»15 71%
Around 20 hours/week»5 23%
Around 25 hours/week»1 4%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

21 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 9%
75%»5 23%
100%»14 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.57

- Missade första föreläsningen.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

21 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»5 23%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 9%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»14 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.19

- Missade första föreläsningen om de var med där.» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 6%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 93%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

16 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 6%
Yes, definitely»14 87%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 14%
Large extent»8 38%
Great extent»10 47%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- The lecturer was very pedagogical and knowing and had no problems to make subjects interesting.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»1 4%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»14 66%
Great extent»6 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.19

- Good compendium!» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

21 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»11 52%
Very well»10 47%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

- i was missing a course pm and a schedule of what would be presented at the lectures» (Rather well)
- The course was well structured.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

21 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 9%
Very good»18 85%
I did not seek help»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.95

- It way always possible to talk to Anders!» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

21 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 4%
Rather well»9 42%
Very well»6 28%
I did not seek cooperation»5 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

11. How was the course workload?

21 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»11 52%
Adequate»9 42%
High»1 4%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.52

12. How was the total workload this study period?

21 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 14%
Adequate»6 28%
High»8 38%
Too high»4 19%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- Tog bara en kurs» (Low)
- The course we read parallel with this(KBT191) had an extremely high workload that in no way corresponded to its hp. This lead to that I could not spend as much time as I wanted on this course, which is a real pity as I found it very interesting.» (Too high)
- Nuclear Chemistry took more than 50h/week» (Too high)
- i had 3 courses with very many handins, so it was nice for me that there were no compulsory moments in this course » (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

21 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 14%
Good»11 52%
Excellent»7 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.19 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- A little bit to easy.» (Adequate)
- Det finns nog utrymme för att ha lite mer innehåll i kursen. » (Good)
- A very interesting course with a very pedagogical and knowing lecturer.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The compendium, which is a pleasure to read!»
- Anders as lecturer and the guest lecturer who talked about safety culture.»
- guest lecture. The teacher»
- The seminar of WANO, really interesting.»
- This course and its excellent lecturer.»
- the lecture about safety culture »
- The compedium is very good and useful. It is also nice to have the slides. I liked the software which simulates the operation of a NPP»
- Tysken från Paris som föreläste om säkerhet.»
- Anders Nordlund»
- Lecture by WANO - Safety Culture!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Perhaps fix some small errors in the compendium. Otherwise, no complains.»
- Perhaps add some more guest lecturers.»
- Nothing»
- The nuclear chemistry course KBT191. »
- there is no need to add more type reactor rather than PWR and BWR in introductory syllebus.»
- Rätta alla fel i kurskompendiet.»
- maybe they could add a study visit (visit of a nuclear power plant)»

16. Additional comments

- Great course!»
- May be is useful go into deep for neutrons detectors and which are the consequences and connection between void, fuel temperature, reactivity and power.»
- Thanks for a good course!»
- Anders could maybe ask some more questions to the students. In total, very good course to get a broad overview about many issues in Nuclear Reactors!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.19

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.19
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.79

Kursutvärderingssystem från