Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Fundamentals of micro- and nanotechnology FKA196

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-29 - 2012-11-07
Antal svar: 22
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 64%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

22 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»10 45%
Around 20 hours/week»6 27%
Around 25 hours/week»4 18%
Around 30 hours/week»1 4%
At least 35 hours/week»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 1.95

- there was a lot of material properties to grasp in mind» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

22 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 4%
50%»3 13%
75%»8 36%
100%»10 45%

Genomsnitt: 4.22

- I have not missed any single lecture» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

22 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 13%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 9%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»10 45%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 31%

Genomsnitt: 2.95

- As usual, it takes a while before one gets the full view of the course, but towards the end it was pretty clear what it is all about.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

19 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 5%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»18 94%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.94

- I think it could explore a bit more advanced topics as well» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

20 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»12 60%
Yes, definitely»7 35%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

- The quiz based exam certainly allows to cover a wide field of knowledge, but I feel that the actual exam questions were unexpected and hard to prepare for.» (To some extent)
- there were quite abit of questions on the exam requring calculations although we have had non of that on lectures or as exercises.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent»2 9%
Some extent»7 31%
Large extent»8 36%
Great extent»5 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- The lectures were a vital add-on to the content of the slides.» (Large extent)
- the only thing which was not really highlighted was the numerical calculation (we performed some towards the end of the course and not really have a desired aquaintance with it)» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent»2 9%
Some extent»8 36%
Large extent»9 40%
Great extent»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.59

- There are two e-books recommended, but it would be very helpful for example to point out which chapters a lecture relates to. » (Small extent)
- Slides on homepage» (Some extent)
- the lectures did well to provide the literature material for each and every lecture» (Great extent)
- The quizes were a good learning tool» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

22 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 9%
Rather well»9 40%
Very well»11 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- Information was usaually distributed late and only upon request. One lecture was cancelled only two hours before it was supposed to take place. In gerneral there was quite some confusion about what was going on.» (Rather badly)
- the information about the literature project was late in the comming» (Rather well)
- Great with discussion etc» (Very well)
- all was done well on pingpong» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

22 svarande

Very poor»1 4%
Rather poor»3 13%
Rather good»6 27%
Very good»9 40%
I did not seek help»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- Avgust constantly encouraged us to ask questions during lectures. But out of lecture times, there was no getting help whatsoever, not even e-mails were answered.» (Very poor)
- questions and worries were answered» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

21 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 28%
Very well»13 61%
I did not seek cooperation»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- working together in projects, and lab sessions» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

22 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»5 22%
Adequate»15 68%
High»2 9%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

- but kind of managable» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

22 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 9%
Adequate»13 59%
High»6 27%
Too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- I had another demanding class» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

21 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»9 42%
Good»11 52%
Excellent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.61 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- -The lab exercises -The literature study project -The practice quizes»
- The practical works in cleanroom»
- Labs where VERY interesting, but too short»
- The cleanroom labs!»
- definitely yes»
- Clean room entrance. »
- Anything »
- Quizes»
- Poster presentation»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- -Do more calculation examples in class -Maybe do a graded quiz in during the term»
- the exam questions were quite different from the ones given as example, especially the ones requiring calculations for which we didn"t have training during the course»
- add more calculation exercises with TAs and advice questions that should be done etc»
- Work on presentation technique, it gets quite difficult to keep focus on the lectures, activate the crowd a bit more. »
- No»
- Nothing »
- More excercises with an assistent»

16. Additional comments

- I found it not fair that the rules for the exams that were told us in the introductory lecture were then changed only a week before the exam. (I refer to the fact that not all the quizzes were given to us as said in the beginning.)»
- Except for the organisational issues, the course was good.»
- The lab course was great!»
- It could be better to increase oppportunity of doing some numerical application exercises for student to be able to spot the important formulas and how they are used»
- In my opinion, it would be better if there are: 1) More clean room entrances, giving the student an opportunity to see in real time the several processes (helps to understand and memorize better the several steps of each process since there are too many) , or if this is impossible to introduce a way for the students to have a more active role like we did have during the literature project. 2) during the lectures an example of using some formulas should be given, since we had to face during the exams problems with calculations.Or at least an analytical solution of such a problems should be given to these kind of questions taking place to the course"s site as quizzes »
- Good»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.61

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.61
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.65

Kursutvärderingssystem från