Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPWPS 1213-1 Semiconductor devices MKM135
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-10-26 - 2012-11-11 Antal svar: 5 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 62% Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.5 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 1 | | 20% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 1 | | 20% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 2 | | 40% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 3.4 - I had no time to do recommended problem solving since the home assignments took so long time to finish. » (Around 30 hours/week)
- There is a lot to do with 4 big home assignments and a project and ontop you should also study to the exam...» (At least 35 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 5 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 20% |
75%» | | 0 | | 0% |
100%» | | 4 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 4.6
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?5 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 1 | | 20% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 3 | | 60% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.4 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 4 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?5 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 4 | | 80% |
Yes, definitely» | | 0 | | 0% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 2.4 - The exam was kinda strange compared to what we were prepared to solve. I mean I feel that i have a good idea about the majority of the course but some questions on the exam were really tricky and involved what to me seemed like a unsolveable problem.» (To some extent)
- There were some questions which seemed a bit of topic.» (To some extent)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?5 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 60% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 40% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.4 - Some lectures have been hard to understand, due to both the difficult physics and some linguistic problems.» (Some extent)
- Sad to say, I had a really hard time following Huan. The others were good, Olle did a great job on the tutorials» (Large extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?5 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Large extent» | | 4 | | 80% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - The book is good actually, just not really designed to really explain stuff, more as a reference. » (Some extent)
- The course literature has of course meant a lot to be able to complete the home assignments, but at least the book is quite hard to understand, it might be a bit to advanced...» (Large extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?5 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 20% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 60% |
Very well» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - The course page was not updated. Missing info about date and time for project presentations etc. » (Rather badly)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?5 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 40% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 60% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.6 - I really felt welcome to ask at any time!» (Very good)
10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?5 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 20% |
Very well» | | 4 | | 80% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.8 11. How was the course workload?5 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 20% |
High» | | 1 | | 20% |
Too high» | | 3 | | 60% |
Genomsnitt: 4.4 - The course takes a lot of time with a lot of mandatory parts. And also you need to study to the exam, since the exam covers far more then the home assignment does.» (Too high)
12. How was the total workload this study period?5 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 40% |
High» | | 2 | | 40% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 3.8 - I would say Extremely high when coupled with MMIC, I know if it "too" high though. Good to really push the limit atleast one period during you chalmers time, but the workload was on the edge of what students can handle.» (High)
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?5 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 20% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 60% |
Good» | | 1 | | 20% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - I had problems understanding what one of the lecturer said. » (Adequate)
- I think the course have a lot of interesting material, just felt that some really interesting parts in the end didn"t get enough time, ex. Impatt & Gunn.» (Good)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Home assigments(And the fair and good corrections)»
- good lecture/tutorial structure, home assignments»
- The lab session. The lab
instructor was really good at explaining. »
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Would be nice with some more old exams so its possible to know what to expect. And as I mentioned before some lectures (Huans) where hard to follow, might be hard to change tho. »
- There need to be more exams to study on. One which is solved on a tutorial is not enough, especially when it contains problems that is excluded from this years course.
The lectures need to be better and easier to grasp.
The size of the home assignments should maybe be smaller.»
- the language proficiency of the different teacher was very unequal. some lectures were exhausting due to english-related issues.»
16. Additional comments- The course is very good, but too much work load.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.5
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|