Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPWPS 1213-1 Satellite communications RRY100

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-26 - 2012-11-11
Antal svar: 25
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 75%
Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

25 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 16%
Around 20 hours/week»10 40%
Around 25 hours/week»8 32%
Around 30 hours/week»2 8%
At least 35 hours/week»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

- Few hours before the project, intensive work during project» (Around 20 hours/week)
- The subject of the report was really wide, it was really time consuming.» (Around 30 hours/week)
- difficult to estimate, but i think it was way more than my other course» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

25 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 4%
50%»8 32%
75%»8 32%
100%»8 32%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- I particularly appreciated the lectures given by the engineers from RUAG Space.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

25 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 8%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 4%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 16%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»18 72%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

4. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

23 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»8 34%
Yes, definitely»15 65%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.65

Teaching and course administration

5. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

24 svarande

Small extent»1 4%
Some extent»9 37%
Large extent»10 41%
Great extent»4 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- The teaching was mostly old stuff that we allready knew from previous courses on MPWPS» (Small extent)
- I particularly appreciated the lectures given by the engineers from RUAG Space. It gave us an overview of the market in Satellite Commuications. Otherwise, some lectures were in fact a repetition of what could have been done in other courses (Frii"s formula, Link Budget...). Not the case of every lectures fortunately, some were greatly axed on satellite communications.» (Some extent)

6. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

24 svarande

Small extent»2 8%
Some extent»11 45%
Large extent»9 37%
Great extent»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

- I haven"t bought the books, I just relied on the lectures slides, books from former courses and » (Some extent)

7. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

25 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 4%
Rather well»10 40%
Very well»14 56%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

- It is very good to let the students correcting the homework. I think it is really helpful for us.» (Very well)

Study climate

8. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

25 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»8 32%
Very good»16 64%
I did not seek help»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

9. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

25 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 4%
Rather well»14 56%
Very well»9 36%
I did not seek cooperation»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- As we need to write the report separately, the discussion is a bit of limit.» (Rather well)
- Concerning the projects, it is weird to "work" in group and give back an individual report. Everybody is thus free to choose his own solution but then it is not really a team work any more.» (Rather well)

10. How was the course workload?

25 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 12%
Adequate»17 68%
High»4 16%
Too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- The subject of the report was really wide, it was really time consuming.» (High)

11. How was the total workload this study period?

25 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 12%
Adequate»14 56%
High»6 24%
Too high»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- Bad proportionned» (Adequate)
- The report is not so easy.» (High)
- The project is a little hard to us.» (High)

Summarizing questions

12. What is your general impression of the course?

25 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 4%
Adequate»5 20%
Good»12 48%
Excellent»7 28%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The project was the whole point of this course, besides that I didn"t learn much new.» (Adequate)
- I really appreciated the day at Onsala observatory and the visit of RUAG Space facilities. The lectures given by the engineers from RUAG were great too.» (Excellent)

13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The written examination.»
- The project!»
- field trip»
- home assignments,labs,report»
- the excursion at Onsala»
- Intresting project. Good laboration tasks and field trips.»
- Company visit»
- The idea of project, milestone of the course for me. The day at Onsala observatory and the visit of RUAG Space facilities, and the lectures given by the engineers from RUAG. The correction of the homework by the students, the two hours of group work.»
- Rudiger»
- Home assignments was good.»
- the project»
- Friday group meetings. It really helps to understand if you are in the right track of your project. I like the idea that you have to solve the assignments on the board. Also the oral examination, it"s perfect and the idea that the group discusses together its own ideas and how he/she solved it.»
- The laboratory at OSO, although some of the labs could be improved.»

14. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The way lectures are made and the material (the slides are not enough)»
- Maybe two students a group, develop the proposal together but write the report separately. »
- Maybe, reduce the subject for the project. it is too huge and we can"t ake everything into account in 15pages..»
- Announce before the labs what kind of documentation is required. (Lab report)»
- More details in the project statement»
- Maybe a less wide project which would let the students being more accurate in their research and report. The notion of group: team work and one report or team work with many reports (and so the risk to work on its own)?»
- Maybe define the project a bit more...»
- Include more new stuff that hasn"t allready been in previous courses.»
- the guest lecture wasn"t that impressive for me.»
- Nothing...»

15. Additional comments

- Very good and interesting course.»
- All in all a very good course with extremely good atmosphere for learning. Keep up the good work. »
- Perhaps add a draft hand-in of the project a few weeks in to get some initial feedback?»
- Tack för en trevligt kurs!»
- I think it will be better if we have some instruction for the project at the beginning instead of in the last lecture. Apparently we don"t know how and what to start with in the beginning. »
- Want to thank all the teacher especially to Rüdiger for their help.»
- The slides which were shown during the lecture were sometimes not very clear. When one missed a lecture, it was not easy to understand the topic by just reading over the lecture slides. Sometimes the lecturer was pretty quick and eventually it was difficult to remember all the different issues.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75

Kursutvärderingssystem från