Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPWPS 1213-1 Image processing RRY025

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-26 - 2012-11-11
Antal svar: 44
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 72%
Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

44 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»15 34%
Around 20 hours/week»19 43%
Around 25 hours/week»9 20%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

- it covers very wide range of subject so it can be reduced the quantity and add more quality to some subject» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

44 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»18 40%
100%»26 59%

Genomsnitt: 4.59

- Very good lecturer. But it was not good that the lectures were in four hour blocks. » (75%)
- I had modules clashing with this course» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

44 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 9%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 2%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 13%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»33 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

40 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 2%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»38 95%
No, the goals are set too high»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

43 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»12 27%
Yes, definitely»31 72%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- The exam could have been a little bit more challenging. » (To some extent)
- Did not really cover the "math" part» (To some extent)
- I think the exam could cover a broader spectrum of the course, with more questions.» (To some extent)
- Exam seemed too easy.» (To some extent)
- i like open book exams. this exam had good questions to check deep understanding of the topic. This is what i think is most important when studying. Exams where you just have to study details by heart are useless, because those details are forgotten after a few weeks and nothing is learned for live.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

44 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 4%
Large extent»15 34%
Great extent»27 61%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

- Enthustiastic teacher is a plus. He talks sometimes a bit much. Compress your sayings :)» (Large extent)
- the lecturers enthusiastic teaching kept me motivated and concentrated (a lot lot better than many of those very boring lecturers which make you feel asleep)» (Large extent)
- he can be kind of pattern for many teachers in Chalmers. he is great and wonderful » (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

44 svarande

Small extent»4 9%
Some extent»11 25%
Large extent»21 47%
Great extent»8 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- the script could have been a lot better and i didn"t buy the book (too expensive)» (Small extent)
- he must revise the old lecture notes» (Some extent)
- the course book is helpful, but we can easily get lost in the text: sometimes the author explained a bit too much, that results in an unclear text sometimes (speaking about Gonzalez). The compendium has some errors, why not correct it sooner? It is hard to think about correcting it when you don"t have it on paper in front of you.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

44 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»16 36%
Very well»28 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- Maybe the handouts could have been include in the "unofficial" web page. That would have been easier, instead of switching every time from one web site to the other.» (Rather well)
- But it would be nice if there were a hand out with the collected corrections of the lecture notes, so you don"t miss them if you can"t go to the lecture.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

43 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 2%
Very good»41 95%
I did not seek help»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Very good that Alessandro was there both before and after the lecture. » (Very good)
- this is one of the strengths of the lecture» (Very good)
- It is really great and helpful to be able to ask questions during one hour after the class.» (Very good)
- the lecturer answered any kind of question in great detail, thanks for that Alessandro.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

43 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»13 30%
Very well»30 69%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

- i didn"t know my project partner when we started the project, but we ended up doing very well.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

43 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»5 11%
Adequate»36 83%
High»2 4%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

12. How was the total workload this study period?

43 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 4%
Adequate»28 65%
High»8 18%
Too high»5 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

44 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 6%
Good»15 34%
Excellent»26 59%

Genomsnitt: 4.52 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Sometimes the course is a bit too easy» (Good)
- my biggest criticism is: the script is bad and has many errors, and i don"t like paying much money and buying books for every single course.» (Good)
- Excellent course led by a great teacher. I would recommend it.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the teacher»
- The exercises during the lectures, the lecturer, the notes »
- 1. Projects 2. MATLAB toolbox sessions»
- Alessando»
- The teacher»
- Project»
- yes, specially with the same lecture»
- the method the teacher had used.»
- The teacher»
- The commitment from the teacher, and his willingness to help and answer questions.»
- teacher , teacher , teacher»
- The questions hour just after the course. The projects and the presentations, rather good to learn from the others. »
- The teacher»
- Alessandro Romeo»
- A project and »
- the way to teach cause it"s really easy and pleasant to follow the teacher ,) »
- The project work the teacher »
- Everything this year has been awesome»
- The topic on wavelet transform»
- the style of lecture the lecturer, stay nice! :D open book exam»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- need more hours of classes »
- The four hour blocks. That is too long. Two hours is enough. »
- 1. Lecture note 2. Literature or add more of them»
- The time spend for the wavelets and the kind of the exam»
- Nothing»
- no thing, every thing was perfect.»
- Let the exam cover a larger part of the course.»
- lecture notes must be revised , increase quality of subject as well decrease the subjects»
- The compendium could be corrected instead of telling in class what the errors are. More "home exercises" to be corrected in class.»
- Fix all the errors in the course litterature, or make a complete list of all errors.»
- Maybe have more examples during the lecture.»
- Some of the lecture notes, that are not clear at all, but you can complement them with the notes you take in class and the book. For those who study biomedical engineering, would like to have more examples on that field.»
- NIL»
- the script (i know you don"t have the tex sources, but it"s definitely something that needs improvement)»

16. Additional comments

- none»
- Alessandro is probably the best lecturer I have had at Chalmers.»
- Great course!»
- Good teacher so good course !»
- Thank u teacher for giving us interesting lecture»
- The professor teaching the course was very passionate about his subject. He was engaging and managed to keep the class interested during lectures. Best lecturer I´,ve had. »
- the course has the best teacher everrrr!»
- 4 hours of course in a row are too much»
- Alessandro is great teacher , he is quiet responsible , his commitment to the class is amazing , there was a italian student also in class , even he did not answer his question in Italy , to prevent discrimination feeling , the thing that many teachers didn"t care .»
- The lecturer was very good and he was really passionate about his subject. He was patient in explaining concepts to everyone and spent time on the weaker students. He built a friendly and great atmosphere conducive for learning. I really loved this course.»
- Alessandro one of the best lecturer in my life»
- Thanks for a great lecture Alessandro!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.52

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.52
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.88

Kursutvärderingssystem från