ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPWPS 1213-1 Design of monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MIMC) EME110

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-26 - 2012-11-11
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 66%
Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»2 33%
Around 30 hours/week»3 50%
At least 35 hours/week»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- I"ve never spent more time in any course at Chalmers. However the time was well spent and I"ve learnt a lot so I am definitely not complaining. Please don"t change anything as I feel that the course is very well organized and thought through.» (Around 30 hours/week)
- Hard to eastimate but i thinks its more close to 30+, anyway required ALOT of energy and time. » (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 16%
75%»1 16%
100%»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- Great teacher. Perhaps the best I"ve had. Slides were well done, Morteza has great presentation skills and really seem to know what he is talking about. Give hime a raise!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 66%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 16%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 83%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 50%
Yes, definitely»2 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- Well the home assignments where good, and the presentations format too, haven"t handed in the report yet. » (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 50%
Great extent»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Morteza is a great lecturer, he really always adds a new view on some circuit problem you though you knew! He gave me a "aha" each lecture» (Great extent)
- Best teacher in Chalmers» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»1 16%
Some extent»3 50%
Large extent»1 16%
Great extent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- Didnt really need more than the lectures, for the assignments » (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 16%
Rather well»2 33%
Very well»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- The booking of computer lab and lecture rooms was not satisfactory. Sometimes it wasn"t booked or the wrong room was booked. The announced room for project presentations was not booked. Time-Edit was not updated with the correct lecture/computer rooms. » (Rather badly)
- Unfortunately there were some troubles with the computers in the beginning of the course. Otherwize like clockwork» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 16%
Very good»5 83%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- I really felt Marcus helped us finish the project on the really tight deadline!» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 33%
Very well»4 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

11. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 16%
High»5 83%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- I mean "too" high is I guess a strange answer since Morteza never said the course would be anything but demanding, but and option "Extremely high" might be more accurate :)» (High)
- Workload was high but this is not negative. If you want to learn a lot you need to work hard.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 16%
High»4 66%
Too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Did this course with semiconductor devices which also required alot time, i.e. no free weekends (or weekdays). Sundays 10-22 as standard :)» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 16%
Good»3 50%
Excellent»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too similiar to the Active Microwave course for the first 5 weeks. » (Good)
- Well hell of a demanding course :D, wouldnt work if every course were anywhere near this courses workload but as a isolated occasion at the end of the education its ok! A great wrap up of a lot concepts a designer need to know.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- for finishing the final project we need more time to learn more and understand that»
- The lectures, Most of the assigment (It felt like the last one just hindered the designing)»
- Projectwork was really good.»
- Everything. Thanks for a great course!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- change the time for project»
- The gap with the assignments were strange, made us lose a week of designing our components, would be nice with more time for that!»
- The actual MMIC part was treated too briefly... No lecture about MMIC design, maximal some picture how it could look like. Rather a repetition even though in more detail of the active microwave course for the first 5 weeks.»
- Perhaps all homeassignments should be done first, and then you introduce the project. Now we had a "break" before the last home assignment which made it "collide" with the project. This just ment that we basically lost a week for the project. However the break was nice and should perhaps be kept as one needs to rest some before starting with the project. I would suggest 5 weeks of home assignments, break, than introduce project. Now we had 4 weeks of home assignments, "break", homeassignment 5 and project. However I can"t imagine someone started with the project until HA5 was finished.»
- The starting time for the project should be earlier than this year. More info about how ADS and the WIN_CTH design kit works can be given during lecture.»

16. Additional comments

- that"s a good course for find the experience but must pay attention more for that »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.16
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.16
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.79

Kursutvärderingssystem från