Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPEES 1213-1 Introduction to integrated circuit design MCC091
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-10-26 - 2012-11-11 Antal svar: 13 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 48% Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.13 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 1 | | 7% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 1 | | 7% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 8 | | 61% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 7% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 2 | | 15% |
Genomsnitt: 3.15 - due to the hand-ins» (At least 35 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 13 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 7% |
75%» | | 2 | | 15% |
100%» | | 10 | | 76% |
Genomsnitt: 4.69
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?13 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 2 | | 15% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 4 | | 30% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 7 | | 53% |
Genomsnitt: 3.23 - How much weight on which parts. It seemed to much to learn for a 7.5 hp course.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.12 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 10 | | 83% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 2 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 2.16 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?13 svarande
No, not at all» | | 1 | | 7% |
To some extent» | | 4 | | 30% |
Yes, definitely» | | 7 | | 53% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.61 - There were no assignments on delays on the exam, despite the fact that we spent a significant part of the course learning about it. Our exam was surprisingly bad at testing what we had learned overall.» (No, not at all)
- Because i thought exams didnt cover the portion which was mainly emphasized in class.» (To some extent)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?13 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 15% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 15% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 38% |
Great extent» | | 4 | | 30% |
Genomsnitt: 2.84 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?13 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 15% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 23% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 38% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 2.69 - I have not bought the book.» (Small extent)
- Good book» (Large extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?13 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 6 | | 46% |
Very well» | | 7 | | 53% |
Genomsnitt: 3.53 - Really good use of Ping-pong» (Very well)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?13 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 1 | | 7% |
Rather good» | | 4 | | 30% |
Very good» | | 8 | | 61% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.53 - The consulation time is too short, It takes me an hour to go to school and come back, but the consulation time is like half an hour.» (Rather poor)
10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?13 svarande
Very poorly» | | 1 | | 7% |
Rather poorly» | | 1 | | 7% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 30% |
Very well» | | 7 | | 53% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.3 11. How was the course workload?13 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 38% |
High» | | 7 | | 53% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.69 - Could be due to the high work-load on the other course. The work-load for both courses was too high.» (High)
- I felt it was high, but in the same time it was very interesting and thus it was worth it all the way.» (High)
12. How was the total workload this study period?13 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 15% |
High» | | 7 | | 53% |
Too high» | | 4 | | 30% |
Genomsnitt: 4.15 - I felt it was high and in periods almost too high, but in the same time it was very interesting and thus it was worth it all the way.» (High)
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?13 svarande
Poor» | | 1 | | 7% |
Fair» | | 2 | | 15% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 15% |
Good» | | 7 | | 53% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.38 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Some of hand in tasks was not logically understandable (task 5 in hand in 3). Teacher not prepared for some lectures.» (Fair)
- Some handin/prelabs was confusing and time-consuming.» (Good)
- Labs was verry interesting. Also Kjell is a strict but good teacher.» (Good)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Hand-ins, prelabs.»
- All the assignments. They halp you stay up to date with the course which is important since the other course (DAT091) takes a lot of time, and it"s easy to lag behind in other courses.»
- Weekly hand-in assignments»
- Lenas assignments were pedagogic and instructive»
- just be like this»
- Exercise lecture.»
- I think the lab manuals should be preserved next year.»
- The topics that have been taught this year.»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Exam, could be that we had none "old exams" to study for the final-exam, but it was hard to really think through all of the questions in the four hours-exam-time. We also had trouble at some of the lab-sessions, where cadence did not start or some administrial configuration did not work.»
- Nothing really. There was a couple of confusions with the processes, but I think that"s very understandable since it"s a new process this year (65nm) and that"s bound to confuse things.»
- i have no idea, it"s ok»
- The Pre assignments,some Bonus Points should be given if 25% of the assignment is wrong.»
- the home assignments, less home assignments and also more consulation time.»
16. Additional comments- N.A.»
- Doing logic in excel is more a lecture in excel than in logic.»
- Caidence is not so easy to fight with.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.38
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.38 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.59
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|