Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

TD LP1 12/13 Ergonomics design for all PPU185

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-26 - 2012-11-12
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 30%
Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 9%
Around 20 hours/week»5 45%
Around 25 hours/week»4 36%
Around 30 hours/week»1 9%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 45%
100%»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.54

- The mandatory presence seems very "childish" to a university course in my oppinion» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 18%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 9%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 54%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- All the assigments must be clearly specified in the begining of the course. A list with all assigments (including workshops and what should be handed in after it) and dates is needed.» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Although as stated a little "fuzzy"» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»1 9%
To some extent»4 36%
Yes, definitely»4 36%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»3 27%
Some extent»7 63%
Large extent»1 9%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.81

- Some lectures were rather irrelevant to the project I had» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»2 20%
Some extent»5 50%
Large extent»2 20%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- I had good base knowledge in the subject already.» (Some extent)
- All needed information was provided and we didn"t have to look for it ourselves» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»1 9%
Rather badly»3 27%
Rather well»7 63%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

- It is not ok to not tell (email) the students if a lecture is cancelled. A small text in swedish on the door of the lecture hall is not a way to tell the students (even if it also is a requirement.) Set the groups beforehand a group work! It is ok that people don"t know the other group members. See that everthing is prepared before the lectures so will all people be less stressed and confused, including the lecturers.» (Rather badly)
- Lectures should be uploaded to Pingpong faster» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 18%
Rather good»5 45%
Very good»2 18%
I did not seek help»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 27%
Very well»8 72%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- Very good that we were given groups and didn"t have to waste time on forming groups!» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»11 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 90%
High»1 9%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»4 36%
Fair»2 18%
Adequate»3 27%
Good»1 9%
Excellent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.36 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- not challenging enough» (Poor)
- Not much new information, guest lectures not as related to the course as they should etc.» (Poor)
- Needs more "routine", but fine for a first time » (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- method of presentation»
- Workshop»
- Blind, wheelchair workshop»
- Workshop where we had experience of blindness & using wheelchair were very good - "eye opening"»
- Presentation of last assignment (poster and summary)»
- Poster nice. The wheelchair and blindness workshop.»
- Nice way to have the project in different assignments (and not requiring a formal project report). Also, PLEASE keep the poster presentation, it was very very good. »
- Better guest lectures»
- The e-litterature and the project work»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- contents and lectures! they were not good at all. lack of content and lack of planning. some of them were not relevant at all. you felt like you wasted your time way too much.»
- Course syllabus»
- More differentiation in tasks I am the project »
- EMG lecture with Göran Hägg was hard to follow and see how it was applicable in this subject or projects.»
- No newsarticle on the group work. EMG workshop.»
- Make the assignments more challenging. Consider to make the projects more "equal", because the environments chosen for the projects were very very different, which means each group had different difficulties and some might have been easier than other. Some methods were also not applicable for every project. »
- the group assinment shoul be differnt, did not learnanything new from the project»
- Better guest lectures»
- More consistency between the lectures»

16. Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.36

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.36
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.34

Kursutvärderingssystem från