Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

TD LP1 12/13 Industrial design engineering - theory and methodology PPU090

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-26 - 2012-11-12
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 35%
Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 7%
Around 20 hours/week»4 30%
Around 25 hours/week»6 46%
Around 30 hours/week»1 7%
At least 35 hours/week»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

- Great in that one could distribute load depending on individual needs.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 23%
100%»10 76%

Genomsnitt: 4.76

- Missed one lecture which unfortunately compromised a large part of the course.» (75%)
- Not really 100, but closer to that than 75, I think» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 7%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 15%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 76%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- They are usually hard to understand by the beginning of the course.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 91%
No, the goals are set too high»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.08

- A bit of repetition of earlier method courses, which I suppose is good since there are new students in the class.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- The goals are on the high side, but it"s also necessary in order to get everyone up on the same level this early in the Master-programme» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 30%
Yes, definitely»8 61%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 15%
Large extent»6 46%
Great extent»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

- A lot of individual work, with little time for feedback. Only feedback was given in groups, where there is a risk that one does not get any feedback.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 7%
Large extent»10 76%
Great extent»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- The lectures have been very helpful too» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 7%
Rather well»3 23%
Very well»9 69%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- Conflicting information in handouts, verbal lectures and notifications via email/Ping Pong.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 30%
Very good»9 69%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 38%
Very well»8 61%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- Thank you for not wasting time by letting us form groups. » (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 76%
High»3 23%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

12. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 46%
High»6 46%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- Mainly because of the other course studied which compromised of a group task where the people I worked with had jobs or other time consuming tasks on the side, which meant increased workload for me.» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 7%
Adequate»1 7%
Good»9 69%
Excellent»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.92 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It was nice to do something different than we usually do, to read more and get deeper into a subject. I also really like MariAnne as a lecturer. » (Good)
- Interesting to let students pick fields which interest them. Probably yields a higher motivation and better learning results, although less targeted towards a subject.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- High academic level. Nice approach to dealing with cross cultural and cross disciplinary collaboration.»
- Interesting lectures and seminars.»
- Assignment 4»
- The final assignment»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Inconsistent communication. Might be interesting to introduce cross disciplinary work somehow, perhaps include other programmes?»
- assignment 3 could be changedinto something mor interesting and djupgående»
- The time given for writing essays should be longer.»
- Assignment 1B»
- can"t think of anything»

16. Additional comments

- Thank you for the course!»
- a great course with an active teacher who cares and engage in her students. fun start at the master programe»
- nope»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.92

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.92
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.73

Kursutvärderingssystem från