|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Source coding, SSY140, VT2008Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2008-03-05 - 2008-03-19 Antal svar: 42 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 80% Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.42 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.97 - The projects took a lot of time.» (At most 15 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?42 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.21 - The pace at lectures has been very low, making it feel like a waste of time to attend full lectures. Perhaps not all questions need to be answered if the majority of the class still follows?» (25%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?42 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.73 - Linear prediction should be taught more» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.37 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.97 - The goals for a communication engineer is somehow vague.» (?) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?40 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.2 - it tested difficult concepts » (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?42 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.42 - the teacher didnt explain in a good way. i read from the book and understood some stuff in the exercise sessions. Teaching assistant Ali was very good and explained very well. the other teaching assistant was not good and also had the same problem as the teacher , he could not explain stuff though he tried his best. he just solved the exercises.» (Small extent) 7. What do you think of the lectures before the mid-quarter course evaluation?- Slow»- Too many derivations.» - Pretty bad. But good considering hes only stand-in!» - The teacher is too worried that everyone is not following. Therefor everything takes too much time and it becomes a bit frustrating having to wait all the time.» - quite clear and easy» - somehow,It is not very clear to understand the content of the lecture, but generally it is good» - good,i think i can understant, but actrully there is no help for my mid-exam.» - not so clear, the lectures were kind of boring because lack of clear examples. The examples on the slides suck!! Like Huffman code part~» - good» - Somewhat good» - it"s fine and can be improved in such aspect: content in exercise is better involed in the previous class. » - I think they were very clear on pretty much everything.» - May be the time is to some extent limited but the combination of before and after mid-quarter exam is prefered» - Really confusing.........» - too fast. hard to follow» - since there were no major problems, nothing needed to be changed» - to much information on the lectures» - The lectures were very helpful and gave the essential knwledge for the exam.» - Ok..I could not able to understand the concept behind the various algorithms.more importance was given to entropies and other stuff» - They were OK» - it was quite unclear sometimes what the teacher was going to reach and it was just talking.» - the load is quite ok. and I can understand most of the material. » - Uptill mid-quarter the course was easy.» - very poor.» - Good.» - lectures are quite clear and good to understand.» - They were ok.» - The lectures" slides were easy to follow, but they needed an in-depth review after class, although the blackboard explanations and examples were helpful. The explanations given by the teacher were clear.» - i cant follow the teacher» - the lectures were good sometimes the lecturer seems to delve into meritsdemerits of a scheme earlier before telling the scheme itself.» - good» - they have Poor quality» - They were fine. Could cover more material though.» - a bit confusing due to the math, but one could understand the material after having looked through it again» - Totally ambiguous and hard to understand» 8. What do you think of the lectures after the mid-quarter course evaluation?- Slow»- Content was easily understandable because the teacher spent more time on examples which is good.» - Try to improve your teaching tempo, we are not supposed to understand every single detail at each lesson, maybe wrap up last lecture at the beginning of the next.» - I don"t preffer to see examples first and then hear the theory behind them. I liked it better in the first part of the course.» - Much better! However, Daniel still spends too much time questioning the class weather he should re-explain the last part or not. Too slow that is. » - I think the lectures has been OK throughout the course.» - really difficult to understand and doing some exercices» - It is good enough» - so so» - a little bit better in examples» - better» - Better» - it"s good but can be state more clearly, because the lossy part is more difficult than the lossless one. It"s better to have more examples such as how the algrithm to be implement.» - I didn"t notice any significant change, probably because I was happy with them before and after the mid-quarter course evaluation.» - May be the time is to some extent limited but the combination of before and after mid-quarter exam is prefered» - Get better by more examples...» - better than before.» - the same as now, the performance of the teachers was constant» - Better but still a bit to much of information, think more energy should be put into examples andexplaining them instead of to much theory that one could be easier to understand when you know how it works according to calclatd examples.» - They fullfiled the program.» - The lectures are some what improved after the mid course evaluation.Doing more numerical examples.Giving more importance on the concept rather than mathematical formulas.» - Just as good as before.» - it was more motivating and made students to follow the idea.» - After mid-quarter the course was tough. and teacher tried to teach well.» - still very poor. there was a lot of time wasted in getting acknowledgment from the class. the teacher tried his best but i guess he cannot explain things in a good way.» - Good.» - some of them are too short, not enough explanation on the lectures. as a result, readers may get confuse if they follow only to the lectures. sometimes, they have only a figure but no or not enough description for that to understand it.» - Better in some ways but also worse. It was a bit irritating when the lecturer asked if everybody had understood and waited for a long time for the answer. Sure it"s good to ask sometimes but I think it"s better to just continue, and if there are parts that are unclear it"s the students responsibility to ask.» - The teacher"s explanations became clearer as so did the material in the slides. Also, the new order for the teaching material in each lecture session helped to understand the basics of the course.» - i cant follow the teacher» - the lectures improved further after that» - better» - Acceptable quality but still it can be improved» - They were a bit too slow.» - better» - Improved a bit in terms of understanding.» 9. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?42 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.85 - The book is good.» (Some extent) 10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?42 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.19 - BLACKBOARD :)» (Rather badly) Study climate11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?42 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - the teacher always can"t understand the question,can"t answer me in point» (Rather poor) 12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?42 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.47 - But since no report is needed, not so much cooperation as expected.» (Rather well) 13. How was the course workload?42 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.14 - Could be more.» (Low) 14. How was the total workload this study period?42 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.4 - Could be made more difficult.» (Low) Summarizing questions15. What is your general impression of the course?42 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - i had high expectation but the course was very basic and simple.» (Poor) 16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The course book.»- The Course Book. Its easily understandable.» - The open book exam.» - The projects. They are a great tool when it comes to learning.» - The projects.» - course and exercices in lossless compression» - The projects were a great opportunity for learning by doing» - TA» - The midterm exam» - Project,which helps to understand the lecture a lot.» - The projects» - project is the best way to make student understand the knowledge.» - the course material should be preserved» - Ali as teacher assistant.... and the course book» - additional material (slides)» - Exercises» - Projects should be preserved or even expanded on more of the alghoritms.» - The lectures and exercises are important.» - the projects were good.» - nothing.» - The projects.» - The projects.» - The projects should remain, as they are a perfect way not only to work with Matlab, but also to assure the theory of the course.» - mid quarter exam» - book» - Textbook and exercises» - tutorial improvement, clear handwriting, more orgaized illustration of task solutions» 17. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Mid quarter exam should not be too difficult.»- Increase the lecture tempo a bit, try to use metaphores for for example entropy and the diffrent dimensions in vector quantization. Compare with "intro to digicom"-course and the "stocastic process"- course.» - Perhaps the projects could be counted into the final grade in some way, since so much time is spent working with the them.» - The asian teaching assistant. He is too fast and talks blury.» - nothing» - The code that was handed out was poorly documented» - I think the teacher of the lecture should be improved, for instance, His oral English is not very good, and the slide is not very clear to show the point which we should grasp.» - the way of teaching» - The teacher, send us someone more passionate, please.» - The content of the lecture should change a little bit.» - The projects should have a grade that affects the course grade, not just pass or fail.» - it"s better to make student to understand the knowledge, not pay much time to calculate it in class.» - The good will displayed by Daniel!» - the teaching method should be changed there is a mis-communication problem between the students and the lecturer» - The method of teaching in the lectures should improve.» - course book!» - solutions for every exercise lecture» - They way the lectures are being hold, and the projects (not necessarilly the content) in the way that they should correspond more to the final grade» - I can not see such a thing.» - The projects should be revised. They are (ofcourse) very practical, but they are not very useful for gaining the theoretical understanding needed for the final exam.» - teacher should be more confident.» - everything. the teacher, the book, improve the course contents, include some more mathematical theory. » - More time dedicated to solving problems on your own during the excercises.» - The lectures.» - A larger importance of theory in lecture sessions, so the theory explained in exercise ones will be less and give more importance to apply the theory to practical exercises.» - the course should include few real world standards as well» - way of grading» - The lecture can be improved. It is better to first state what is the main concept of course, and then present some practical examples and finally go to the mathematical stuff» - Should add some homework.» 18. Additional comments- There should also be a seminar/Visit to industry. It will give motivation.»- improve the oral english...» - On the whole, this course is good.» - By the way, I think Ali and Haiying"s exercise is a good way to understand the points got in the lecture.» - I am very satisfied about this course.» - No comments...» - some time teacher is confuse and it appears as that the teacher is looking at the slides first time. he should prepare more for the lectures.» - There should be some points for projects because they take too much time to finish. However they are good projects because I had got more understanding during I was working on them.» - As I said before, the staff did a good job considering the situation.» - Thank you all (teaching staff) for your great effort. You all have nice treatment to student.» - Cover more material.» - well synchronized lecture and book»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
35%