Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MMA136 Ship Geometry and Hydrostatics

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-25 - 2012-11-05
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 53%
Kontaktperson: Carl-Erik Janson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 25%
Around 20 hours/week»4 50%
Around 25 hours/week»2 25%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Of course alot more during the exam-week...» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 12%
75%»3 37%
100%»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.37

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 14%
Yes, definitely»5 71%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3

6. To what extent has the Lectures been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»2 25%
Some extent»2 25%
Large extent»4 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- Lectures confusing and unstructured» (Small extent)
- Sometime the lectures was confusing. It would be good with some more examples during the lectures. The best will be if we have two hours of lecture and two hours of problem solving.» (Some extent)
- Theory lectures were not very clear, sometimes confusing. » (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the Design Classes been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»1 12%
Some extent»4 50%
Large extent»2 25%
Great extent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

- I think Ship design was confursing but the two last programs was good. » (Some extent)

8. To what extent has the Tutorials been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»1 12%
Some extent»1 12%
Large extent»3 37%
Great extent»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I think tutorials should be merged in with lectures. For ex: Explain the theory and right away go into some tutorial problems.» (Great extent)
- It was very good with the small extra problems we have to solve one day there was no theaching. » (Great extent)

Teaching and course administration

9. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»4 50%
Some extent»2 25%
Large extent»1 12%
Great extent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- Did not like the booklet, the tools necessary to understand the course were mostly on the lectures/tutorials or on the home page.» (Small extent)
- The course literature was unstructured and not very helpful.» (Small extent)
- The book is not that good. It would be good with a book there have more examples.» (Small extent)
- The companion is a complete mess and is of no help. I bought another book on ship stability to understand better. Also the powerpoint online put by Ronnie Hanzen are just as messy. Not only is the english language on the slides questionable but also even the mathematical formulas are wrong (missing parts of it, missing coefficients, etc). Very frustrating but I have ot admit it forced me to look up more information and I learnt a great deal just by trying to correct those mistakes.» (Some extent)
- The handouts are ok, the compendium is not good!» (Some extent)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 12%
Rather well»5 62%
Very well»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- The Homepage is not good. The book which was recommended to buy for 225 Kronor was not used what is a waste of money. In the presentation of Ronnie Hanzon are some mistakes and he is still using his old-fashioned foils in the lesson and always searching for the right one. » (Rather badly)
- Great help from the webpage!» (Very well)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 37%
Very good»4 50%
I did not seek help»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 50%
Very well»4 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- We have a good dynamic in the class. very good climate for studying.» (Very well)

13. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 12%
Adequate»7 87%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

14. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»4 50%
Adequate»4 50%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 25%
Good»6 75%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Except for the companion and the powerpoint slides that present wrong information and mediocre english language, I kept a good impression of the class and I have learnt a great deal.» (Good)
- Really liked it, can understand if some want to make a continuation course.» (Good)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The design class, the pace of the course, the professors.»
- Autoship design classes and tutoruals.»
- The design-task is very good! Jans lecture was good and the tutorials was useful! Ronnie is a bit hard to follow during lecture.»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Merging tutorials with theory lessons would be a good idea. Also, find a new companion, more complete, better quality and clearer. »
- Booklet»
- Theoretical part should be revised, presentations and literatures. »
- I think it should be change so you have two lectures and two hours of problem solving and during the lectures there should be more examples.»
- The course would need completely new material. A good book or compendium that the lecture can be based on. »
- Presentation instead of foils in Ronnie Hanzons course, improving the book or remove it.»

18. Additional comments

- The thing is that this class is for most of us the first class we ever have in a naval topic. Everything is new to us (ship stability, etc) so this class has not only a purpose to teach us the basics of ship geometry, stability, hydrostatic but also - i believe - to teach us basic ship/naval knowledge. It is then important to have a clear companion, adequate pace, clear teachers to guide us thru this first interaction with naval architecture. The first impression is always the most important. So let"s make this class more attractive and clearer by having a better book and better powerpoint slides maybe as well include in the lesson real life examples with pictures, videos on how are performed different task in the real engineering world (for example: showing in video or photos how an inclining experiment is performed and how the calculations are completed, etc)»

Kursutvärderingssystem från