Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPSOF 1213-1 Software project and quality management, DAT250|DIT842

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-25 - 2012-11-11
Antal svar: 24
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 57%
Kontaktperson: Börje Johansson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Informationsteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

24 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 25%
Around 20 hours/week»10 41%
Around 25 hours/week»5 20%
Around 30 hours/week»1 4%
At least 35 hours/week»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.29

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

24 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 4%
75%»14 58%
100%»9 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

- Since I could check in advance the difficulty of the material based on printout and review the lecture in video I considered attending to lecture no as important as other courses» (75%)
- Great with recorded lectures for those I missed, as well as a recap for the exam.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

24 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»1 4%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 23%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»15 71%
I have not seen/read the goals»3

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- If there is no relevant experience in the field, it is difficult to understand. After the end of the course I will be able to understand such goals in other courses.» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

22 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»22 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

23 svarande

No, not at all»1 4%
To some extent»9 39%
Yes, definitely»13 56%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0

Genomsnitt: 2.52

- Somewhat narrow questions with only 2p on some» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

24 svarande

Small extent»2 8%
Some extent»4 16%
Large extent»10 41%
Great extent»8 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The slides covered relavant information but were sometimes confusing. They gave the overall impression that a common thread was sometimes missing due to the fact that information was not always clearly structured.» (Large extent)
- Most of the knowledge I gained was during the lectures» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

24 svarande

Small extent»6 25%
Some extent»7 29%
Large extent»6 25%
Great extent»5 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.41

- Most papers were really useful and interesting but to be honest, it was disappointed that nothing in regard to their information was covered in the exam.» (Large extent)
- The papers some times are difficult to understand» (Large extent)
- But is quite arid to read those dense articles.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

24 svarande

Very badly»1 4%
Rather badly»3 12%
Rather well»8 33%
Very well»12 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.29

- inconsistencies and "errors" in the assignment texts and data» (Rather badly)
- But could have separate submissions for re-submission.» (Rather well)
- Good but some problems with exercise sessions: bad planning. Had to present the first assignment on different day. Most times the assignment descriptions were ambiguous, vague and hard to understand.» (Rather well)
- Pingpong isn"t the best but at least there was a homepage. Would be cool if you could stay away from docx or pptx and use pdf exclusively though.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

24 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 4%
Rather good»11 50%
Very good»10 45%
I did not seek help»2

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- A lot of scheduled time for help, almost more than required.» (Very good)
- Good interaction with class.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

24 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 8%
Rather well»7 29%
Very well»15 62%
I did not seek cooperation»0

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- Cooperation worked well. Would be good if results could be given to both student instead of just one, but maybe that"s a pingpong limitation.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

24 svarande

Too low»1 4%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»17 70%
High»5 20%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.08

- The weekly assignments could have been more substantial.» (Low)
- Too many obligatory papers. Many of them are bad written and hard to understand.» (Adequate)
- On average. Some assignments took a lot more time than others.» (Adequate)
- It was high considering that the assignments had to be handed in in 4 days.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

24 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 8%
Adequate»13 54%
High»6 25%
Too high»3 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- Compensated by de low workload of the other course» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

24 svarande

Poor»2 8%
Fair»1 4%
Adequate»4 16%
Good»14 58%
Excellent»3 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.62 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- A little to similar to the obligatory PM-course in the beginninghe» (Adequate)
- Fairly good course. Miroslaws lecturing style is interesting and he asks a lot of questions which takes some time getting used to. I think it is quite difficult to reflect upon something instantly after learning about it. It usually takes a few minutes before sinking in and one could make a relevant comment about it. I do however like that there is a lot of interaction in the lectures. » (Good)
- It was an interesting course» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Miroslaw.»
- Taped classes»
- Recorded lectures. But one improvement. In the lectures, Miroslaw often says "this" and points to things on the slides. It works well for when you sit in the classroom but it is quite hard to follow if you are watching the video. Otherwise, I think the video lectures are great when studying for the exam.»
- - recording of lessons - one small assignment/week - information about your work/researches»
- Class video»
- exam questions, video and slides.»
- The individual assignments. Even though their link back to the courses topic was sometimes hard to identify.»
- All materials are in standard form hope to be used in next year.»
- Taking videos of the lecture, the videos are very helpful when studying.»
- Miroslaws own research in the slides, very interesting with the metrics at Ericsson for example»
- The way of teaching»
- The video slides, assignment in pair was great.»
- Assignments.»
- The video slides are awesome, is should be preserved and the assignment section should be preserved too.»
- All course materials are good and can be preseved for next year.»
- I prefer having one small assignment per week corresponding to what has been covered in the lectures instead of one big assignment. So, this should be kept. Also, presentations about current or previous research work shall be kept.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Better information on what we are suppose to do in the assignments. »
- In class we se a lot of different methods in project planning in software planning and quality management. I would have liked to have seen a real big project implementing as much of this methods as possible.»
- Ambiguous language in corrections for weekly tasks sometimes made it hard to understand what was wrong and whether to resubmit with changes or simply think about the suggested changes later in the course and for the exam.»
- The assignment description was too vague. Is should be clearly described what is excepted. In case we should use templates for the assignment, please give us good templates instead of letting us search for them on the internet. In general, a more detailed feedback would be great to be able to improve in the future. Also, it would be good if a a good example of an assignment would be presented to see how others did the assignment and what can be improved. Please avoid to name but not explain topics. I was disappointed about the summary at the end of the course. I excepted a summary of the content not about the skills/knowledge I should have after the course. »
- Lecture handout. There was information about exam date in the first handout but not this year"s.»
- Exercise.»
- Better structure in slides. Always pointing out were in the overall courses content we currently are and why.»
- Improvement in practical questions so as to reflect to quite complex project planning so as we can learn more on risk analysis, defects and planning of the project activities.»
- Better assigments»
- Moar Agile, Scrum, Kanban, and their connection to Software Quality, ISO9126 etc. How to manage an agile project as a PM.»
- The slides. Some of them are irrelevant, or the images hide the text. The background was tiring for the eyes as well.»
- Lecture slides: They need to be corrected. Some of them have broken links, text out of bounds of slide, pictures on top of each other and some have conflicting information with the corresponding papers (eg. CMMI levels) Assignment Descriptions: they should be more precise and to the point. Now they are very vague and hard to understand. Assignments: Some of them were very simple (eg. how to make a graph in excel), they should be more to them than using some tool.»
- I would like more viewpoints on project and especially quality management. The course did a good job of introducing standards, but how does a small company work? What about managing a team of volunteers?»
- Maybe lectures from 10:15am not 8:15am»
- Assignment question can be modified so as to reflects a problem having some large number of activities so as to learn much in project scheduling, risk analysis.»
- Please explain shortly terms mentioned during the lecture which some student don"t know. »

16. Additional comments

- Exam was slightly confusing as it stated that one should write on the exam itself but also included a lot (~10) blank exam papers. It did not state if it was necessary to put the anonymous code on each page as normally required.»
- I learned a lot :)»
- None.»
- The course content was excellent. I personally recommend the course.»
- Great course! Was glad to be part of it.»
- The assignment about quality assurance plan is about writing a plan (or certain parts of it), however most parts of such a plan were already written in previous assignments. It seems that a quality assurance plan contains parts that we do in previous assignments, thus making us having to write very little in it, in the end. I would suggest that this plan would be the outline for all exercises and every exercise session could implement a little part of it, so at the end of the course every team has a complete quality assurance plan.»
- The course is excellent.»
- In general, I think there should be two courses instead of one combined course. Both project management and software quality management are broad areas. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.62

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.62
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.65

Kursutvärderingssystem från