ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

IAR061 Product development management, autumn 2012, IAR061

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-24 - 2012-11-19
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 31%
Kontaktperson: Marie Iwanow»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 13%
Around 20 hours/week»8 53%
Around 25 hours/week»3 20%
Around 30 hours/week»2 13%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- it was comfortable» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 20%
100%»12 80%

Genomsnitt: 4.8

- the lectures were informative.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 6%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 6%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»8 53%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- It"s feels like a lot of text with not so much content, could be shortened.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»14 93%
No, the goals are set too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 20%
Yes, definitely»12 80%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Having a question on the exam where one has to recall the goals is however, at least in my opinion, rather odd. This seem to suggest that we were to memorize the formulation of the course goals when studying for the exam while most of us undoubtedly focused only on the actual material of the coarse. Had the goals been listed in the question so that only the reflection over these would have been examined it would have made more sense to me.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 6%
Large extent»9 60%
Great extent»5 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

- Very good and clear lectures.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 33%
Large extent»7 46%
Great extent»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»7 46%
Very well»8 53%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 33%
Very good»7 46%
I did not seek help»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly»2 13%
Rather poorly»1 6%
Rather well»4 26%
Very well»8 53%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Many in my group were away, always showed up late, was unwilling to work etc. The enthusiasm for our project weren"t high.» (Very poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»12 80%
High»2 13%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

12. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 33%
High»9 60%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

- Because I read too many courses.. would be adequate otherwise» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 13%
Good»8 53%
Excellent»5 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Very interesting and effective teaching philosophy.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Development game. Guest lecture.»
- Lars and the guy who had the litterature review/lean development were good!»
- Lierature seminairs & Topic Report»
- LEARNING GAMES AND LEAN DEVELOPMENT LECTURE»
- Most things»
- The case lecture and the guest lecture.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe more focus on Lean PD and Set Based concurrent engineering. It"s so interesting!»
- No of groups could be increased to have lesser team members in a group.»
- Not much»
- More guest lectures would be interesting if possible, to give further insight in real pd-work.»

16. Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.2
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.2
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.8

Kursutvärderingssystem från