|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPIDE 1213-1 Interaction design project 1, CIU265Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2012-10-24 - 2012-11-11 Antal svar: 22 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 46% Kontaktperson: Börje Johansson» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Informationsteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.22 - Had another course that was really time demanding.» (At most 15 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.68 - Think I missed one time, but closer to 100% than 75%. » (100%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.37 - I think the goal of the course is wide, and it"s a good thing to keep it open and allow students have less limitation. But when talking about a certain project inside the course, there should be some limitation of the goal. » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.05 - Because of it being a 15 point course last year it was hard to manage everything within half of the time. » (No, the goals are set too high) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.25 - still havent seen the goals» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.9 - Personally I feel the lecture we take in this course is not helpful in personal projects. They are not inspired and lack of some structure. But interaction design is an edgy subject, so this might be the reason why the course is not helpful. » (Small extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.86 - I think this course could do without literature. The book I read, Smart things is much more well suited in for example Tangible Interaction. Let this be a pure project course or at least do not force students to read the literature as fast as was the case. As it was now, no real project work was done the first 3 weeks which sucks! » (Small extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.63 - late and unclear information. messy to keep track of things on a blog. no information about goal, grading, what did we have to do for a certain grade?» (Very badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.28 - Many teachers were involved to make sure that all groups got proper supervision. » (Rather good) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.59 - But I hope the group forming can be also based on the same goal.» (Rather well) 11. How was the course workload?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.68 - Besides one or two weeks when the workload got tight the rest of the time was ok.» (Adequate) 12. How was the total workload this study period?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.09 - Especially towards the end of the period.» (High) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.18 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - free work for the government.. why?? No informationg about grading and no dialogue about what grade we were at. poor exhebition compared to previous years when the students could show their work in a much bigger arena with alot more people.
forced to work with a theme! This would be better as a free project and not as a "work free for the government project". and forced to work with art! :/» (Poor) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- the exhibition, it"s very good»- it was good that you regulary needed to explain and motivate your design desicions/ it was also nice, that you had so much freedom in developing ideas.» - It is important that projects are done within a real context, with a real company/organization behind.» - Josef.» - The useful lectures and teachers support during project work. » - Budget for project, Exhibition» - Exhibition, however, this should be better thought through.. » - Flexibility on attending the seminars or choosing to write individual essay» - fun to build according to a theme, and all the projects turned out so differently!» - We had reasonable freedom, which was good. » - Not much.» - The exhibition!!» - Working with a general concept in mind (e.g. Interaction in public space) is a good way to provide some guidelines. That should be preserved.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Mid presentation. Remove them or replace by the ones as conclusion of design stages would be nice, in my opinion.»- Having to read a book the first week felt strange and took away time from the project. Some guest lectures didn"t give much. Felt like the project could have been more open so you could do what you had planned. We were earlier given information that you could continue your project in the second project course, which made me believe that the course would be more open.» - schedule more time for the realisation of the project» - More information and feedback from the company/organization. Clearer project brief.» - Reduce mental workload.» - Literature seminar they was it was organized was rather stressful. Guest lectures should be more related to the subject or topic of the projects. Advertising/Promotion of the exhibition ! This year there was no promotion at all, just we (the students) tried to spread the word around.» - Better planning of the exhibition, presentations and report writing. More time for actual user studies, i.e., scheduled and not informed afterwards that we could have done this on our spare time..... Rethink course schedule. » - Do no have 3 separate presentations, at least not where we all need to attend. Make 3 critgroups with 3-4 projects in each and let them critize each concept. Then ROTATE each presentation. This means shorter presentationsessions and no repetition. No forced literature reading for week 3. Maybe guide student towards literature when they have selected projects and then ask them to include references to the literature in the report» - 1/2 of the papers...» - -the study visit made no sense, we had no furhter connection to it when we left it, so why even go there? -the exhibition was pointless, first the presentation, all classmates had already heard about the projects so why not make it a walk around thing where you can listen to what you want, and each group gets a time when the lundby people would listen to each group´,s presentation. -the placement, bad! the happening was poorly advertised and there were not many "spontaious" visitors, sadly. -3 days? why so long time? we had a lot to do that week so everyone wrote their report during the exhibition, would be better to have the exhibition on one day, since there are no visitors anyway. -okey, moving on, the books, why not order it to cremona? many studens have money there and the delivery was slow for many of the students so the reading had to be done during the last weekend. - the ordering, sometimes it is actually easier to go shop yourself and get money for it, sometimes amir and farshid were not around for taking orders. - would be better to focus the tutoring to the beginning of course, instead of in the last part. - lectures was too focused on architectre, many of the students are not interested in that.. » - - Scheduling with other course, remove interference. - Scheduling things better in the semester, more internal deadlines, which are making sense (a midterm, where anything can be shown is basically useless to pressure us to get things done) - Literature: more directly useful books/articles, and better scheduled. - A better "sponsor": the Lundby municipality brief just left us so confused what is actually the task. A company would be much, much more interesting, especially for second year students seeking future jobs and theses. - The exhibition should be taken more seriously. Honestly, it"s ridiculous. People don"t find it, it"s not promoted, it"s hidden behind some wall, you don"t expect students to deliver well-working stuff. At least good practices should be passed from Peter to Josef. » - The fact that we were really limited in what we could do in the projects. It should be much much more open and an opportunity for the students to use their creativity and passion to produce a high quality project on their own. Lending us as free labor to the municipality was a real downer.» - Maybe be more careful with the clients offering the projects..they did not have clear goals!!» - - Organizing the projects better. There were projects that heavily relied on materials and these were ordered 2 weeks before the final presentation. It lead to gaps followed by really intense work, there was a lack of balance. - The professors and assistants or tutors, could provide more guidance or pointers for specific practical areas, especially for ideas that might not be that common. Problems always arise when implementing and some of them are unforeseen, which leads to more pressure.» 16. Additional comments- designing for the kulturhuset backaplan was a rather imprecise objective. I wished it would have been a bit more clear... but at the same time it was nice to be open for any kind of projects.»- It is really interesting to have a big project such as this one, but it would be interesting to have better communication with the organization/company.» - Teachers are great, especially Thommy. » - In general was a good course, the subject/theme of the projects was both interesting and also helpful for the community. The time is not enough for making something really great, but 2 study periods are too long for this so there is no optimal solution. There was also much side work which is not related to the project itself and that steals time from actual working on the project. The exhibition was poorly if not at all advertised.» - Expected more of this course, was disappointed in the end. However, this seems to be a reoccurring theme at the IxD program..» - it was good with a real context, but they did not know what they wanted, which made it hard for us. » - Next year, try to cater to all tracks in the master, not just tangible interaction and social media.» Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.18 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.54
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4%