Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPIDE 1213-1 Interaction design methodology, TDA497

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-24 - 2012-11-11
Antal svar: 26
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 42%
Kontaktperson: Börje Johansson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Informationsteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. Which is your programme?

26 svarande

Interaction design and technologies, Chalmers»23 88%
Software engineering, Chalmers»1 3%
Other Chalmers programme»1 3%
University of Gothenburg»0 0%
Other»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 1.26

- ERASMUS» (Other)

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

26 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 7%
Around 20 hours/week»8 30%
Around 25 hours/week»12 46%
Around 30 hours/week»3 11%
At least 35 hours/week»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.73

- I dropped out early on.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- It depends on the period e.g. while project we worked a lot» (Around 20 hours/week)

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

26 svarande

0%»1 3%
25%»1 3%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 3%
100%»23 88%

Genomsnitt: 4.69

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

26 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»1 4%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»9 40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»12 54%
I have not seen/read the goals»4

Genomsnitt: 2.5

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

22 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»22 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

22 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»11 57%
Yes, definitely»8 42%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- I don"t know yet. » (?)
- The first question in the exam was really hard to understand what they wanted. They can make it much clearer and not leave so much space for confusion...» (To some extent)
- The focus of the exam was narrow and was not the same as I had thought during the course and from the course goals.» (To some extent)
- Difficult to understand the questions of the exam.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

24 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 25%
Large extent»11 45%
Great extent»7 29%

Genomsnitt: 3.04

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

25 svarande

Small extent»3 12%
Some extent»6 24%
Large extent»12 48%
Great extent»4 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.68

- The very many different course literature pages made it hard to get an overview and search for relevant information.» (Some extent)
- necessary for exam» (Great extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

25 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»11 44%
Very well»14 56%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

- Would be nice if they could use time edit for schedules. Didn"t like how they could change the time for a class as they pleased, ruined my schedule and had to skip other classes due to this several times.» (Rather well)
- necessary for exam» (Very well)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

25 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»7 28%
Very good»18 72%
I did not seek help»0

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- we had to wait in a line to ask questions to teachers, the class was quite big just for two teachers» (Rather good)
- good feedback from teachers, always available» (Very good)

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

26 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»10 40%
Very well»15 60%
I did not seek cooperation»1

Genomsnitt: 3.6

12. How was the course workload?

24 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»16 66%
High»7 29%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- With one exception when it was very high at the point we received a list with a lot of methods to read up on in only one afternoon/evening before the "project in a day". Some of them we knew sure, but still that list could have been handed out earlier with the great advantage that the methods could have been learned more thoroughly in time for "project in a day".» (Adequate)
- higher in the later weeks and exam» (High)

13. How was the total workload this study period?

25 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 8%
Adequate»15 60%
High»7 28%
Too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- I"ve been preparing for an old exam as well.» (High)
- two long written exams» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

26 svarande

Poor»1 3%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 11%
Good»16 61%
Excellent»6 23%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too much theory..» (Adequate)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Project & Workshop & Eva & Dimi»
- The project (or similar)»
- the innovative thinking !»
- Skewing properties workshop»
- The project and exercises.»
- Eva & Dimi»
- Group projects»
- The project.»
- Workshops and projects»
- That you always could ask questions, stupid or good ones without having a teacher to tell you to look it up yourself.»
- The workshop we had in the project between students. I have not done it in any other course and it was very helpful.»
- Exercises were very good prepared and we were getting support how to make them. I really liked that there was always complete and updated information on the website and we have all the slideshows online.»
- The teachers. The opportunity to have many guest lecturers.»
- Active tasks, like field exercises.»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe provide more seats, spaces for students in Kuggen. It is kind of hard to follow a course in this room.»
- I would like to see some better structure. While the content of the individual lectures were good everything seemed somewhat random as a whole, same with the course material. I did not consider it to be a huge issue though.»
- less theory, and more practical things ! And definitely the workshop that had us work outside of Kuggen, like the "Vasttrafik" interviews-observations»
- The literatue list should coincide more with the exam. It"s not good when some exam questions ask thing that are not in the course literature. (Design process models)»
- I would have liked more lectures on theories regarding ethnographic research, like how to interview. Yes, there was some course literature on the subject, but one or two more lectures on it would have been nice. Maybe a guest lecture with someone who works with this?»
- Proposal: A methods list to read up on could be handed out early in the course.»
- the home exam. I think the grading should be done according to the projects done during the course. »
- * Anonymous home exam!!! * More feedback on different things. The project would be good to have some feedback atleast before the home exam. Otherwise hard to know what to focus on in the exam. * Important to have breaks! 45 min of lecture is maximun. Lectures that are longer are hard to concentrate on. »
- A clearer red thread between lectures and literature»
- Made have more mixed group assignments to get to know the class better.»
- Always group the teams randomly. Then you are forced to adapt to new group members every time.»
- Nothing specific..»
- Exam questions need to be more clear.»
- there should be more pressure to read literature during the course, because it was possible to skip readings at the time they should be read, »
- The home exam. The feedback received on the project.»

17. Additional comments

- Thank you !»
- Maybe some tipps could be given on how to work with the literature. I would have had an easier time if I would have made notes on the literature to find key positions. I often remembered that I had read something but not the book or the position. This is very easy with Mendeley. I feel that I can now prepare myself much better for home exams now that I know how to use the software and what to look for in the literature.»
- Some parts of the course did not give me a serious impression. »
- Very good class. Will use much that I"ve learnt in the future!»
- I had impression that the course is well thought, organized and structured,the teachers were prepared for classes and responded to our comments. I think it was a great introduction to the programme.»
- It would be better have some sessions where students presenting their work to the other fellow students, and have open discussions on methods and solutions chosen.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75

Kursutvärderingssystem från