Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Quantum Informatics, FKA 172

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-03-03 - 2008-03-25
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 70%
Kontaktperson: Göran Johansson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 14%
Around 20 hours/week»4 57%
Around 25 hours/week»2 28%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- Most of the work was done in relation to hand-ins» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 14%
75%»2 28%
100%»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

Teaching and course administration

3. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»1 14%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 28%
Great extent»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- Instead of attending to lectures I used the very well written lecture notes» (Small extent)
- Very good and interesting lectures!» (Great extent)

4. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 28%
Large extent»4 57%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- The well written lecturenotes gave a lot more than Nielsen & Chuang. N&C where mainly useful for the material of the few last lectures. However it is the main literature in the field right now. » (Some extent)
- NC was not so useful for the course especially considering the price and the very good quality of the lecture notes. Maybe point out next year that NC is not really needed, make it complementary literature instead of main literature (studieportalen). » (Large extent)
- The book however treated the subjects too extensively » (Great extent)

5. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 42%
Very well»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- Good updates on the homepage» (Very well)

6. Lectures gave substantial information

7 svarande

Agree»6 85%
Hesitant»1 14%
Disagree»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.14

- Görans lectures were great. well prepared and very pedagogic.» (Agree)
- Nice complement to the lecture notes » (Agree)

7. The exercises and hand-ins helped me to better understand the subject

7 svarande

Agree»7 100%
Hesitant»0 0%
Disagree»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- Was expecting (and hoping for) a bit more mind-boggling hand-ins (more construct-the-problem, less do-the-same-as-in-the-lectures)» (Agree)
- Very good hand-ins. However there was no need to go through the last week hand ins so rigorously as Fredrik Did. More focus on next week hand in would have been better!» (Agree)

8. The lab was inspiring and helped me to better understand the subject

7 svarande

Agree»6 85%
Hesitant»1 14%
Disagree»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.14

- Don"t take away the lab session! God understanding of realization of qubits» (Agree)
- I have not finished the report yet, so I"ll probably get a better understanding soon.» (Hesitant)

9. The guest lectures were inspiring and helped me to better understand the subject

7 svarande

Agree»6 85%
Hesitant»1 14%
Disagree»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.14

- Connection to other universities & industry is always nice. The more the better!» (Agree)
- I ws only present at the first guest by waldraff lecture but in reference to this I Agree. Very nice to once and for all really understand what these guys are talking about» (Agree)
- Did not attend.» (Hesitant)

10. Do you think the course should cover more or fewer topics?

7 svarande

More topics»2 28%
Fewer topics»1 14%
No change»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- Felt enough for this overview course» (No change)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 28%
Very good»5 71%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- Partly due to the fact that it was so few participants in the course» (Very good)

12. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 14%
Adequate»5 71%
High»1 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- An average course » (Adequate)

13. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 57%
High»3 42%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- More than previous periods » (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 14%
Good»3 42%
Excellent»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

- A good overview course - which was my learnign outcome » (Good)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the lab work »
- every part»
- Görans well prepared lectures.»
- The ""physical"" part of the course about rabi and cummings. »
- Hand in"s, really help to keep track of your progress»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the exercise lectures are not so useful. I think more other questions or examples can be shown on the lectures instead just the answer of hand in.»
- notinng»
- The exercise lectures were sometimes not that giving. Sometimes valuebale tips but sometimes just a walktrough of what we already done last week.»
- Maybe don"s have the one hour review of last week hand ins »
- nothing»

17. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från