ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

KBT191 - Nuclear Chemistry 2012, KBT191

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-25 - 2012-11-08
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 94%
Kontaktperson: Stefan Allard»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Kemiingenjör 180 hp

Lectures

1. Lectures: Difficulty

Please grade the difficulty of the lectures in general, with 1 being easy and 5 hard.

17 svarande

1»1 5%
2»3 17%
3»8 47%
4»4 23%
5»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.05 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The course is not difficult, but it"s way to much information!!» (3)
- It was a bit confusing to have so many different lecturers, each with quite different lecturing technique.» (4)
- The difficulty of the lectures were at an appropriate level.» (4)

2. Lectures: Interesting

Please grade how interesting the lectures in general have been, with 1 being "not interesting" and 5 "very interesting".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 11%
3»5 29%
4»7 41%
5»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.64 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Several of the lecturers were quite poor and uninteresting to listen to.» (2)
- They are interesting, yes. But they felt they had almost identical content from the course in "subatomär fysik". Although I understand that all persons which took this course have not a background in physics.» (2)
- Some were very interesting, others were not.» (3)
- Very varying. » (3)
- The lectures were very interesting.» (4)

3. Lectures: Relevance

Please grade how relevant the lectures in general have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

17 svarande

1»1 5%
2»1 5%
3»5 29%
4»7 41%
5»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.58 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The lectures should be in order with the laborations and include some calculations excercises.» (1)
- It felt as we had already read the subject before the lecture.» (3)

4. Lectures: Handouts

Have the handouts been good? Please grade them with 1 being "very bad" and 5 "very good".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 5%
3»5 29%
4»9 52%
5»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.7 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I did not read many of them. » (3)

5. Lectures: Time for questions

Please indicate if there has been enough time for for questions, with 1 being "not enough time" and 5 being "very much time".

16 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 6%
4»7 43%
5»8 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.43 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

6. Lectures: Number of lectures

Would you have liked more lectures to cover the course?

17 svarande

Yes»9 52%
No»8 47%

Genomsnitt: 1.47

- There were several hundred pages to read but only one or two lectures per week. More lectures would have helped in the learning process.» (Yes)
- Much more lectures!» (Yes)
- The number of lectures could not cover the massive content of the course.» (Yes)
- Cause I think course contain a huge syllebus(materials),so sometimes brief discussion of some difficult term will be really helpful.» (Yes)
- Already borderline too many» (No)

7. Lecturer: Prof. Christian Ekberg

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".
(Most lectures of the course)

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 11%
3»0 0%
4»9 52%
5»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 4.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Christan is a good lecturer, knowing and able to keep subjects interesting.» (4)
- Pedagogic, inspiring, interactive» (5)

8. Lecturer: Prof. Gunnar Skarnemark

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".

17 svarande

1»4 23%
2»3 17%
3»5 29%
4»5 29%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

- Seemed unprepared which is however understandable when giving a stand in lecture for someone else.» (1)
- A little difficult to hear because of his stuttering.» (3)

9. Lecturer: Dr. Stellan Holgersson

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".

16 svarande

1»0 0%
2»5 31%
3»6 37%
4»4 25%
5»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

- Extremely boring to listen to.» (2)
- Speaks too silently, mumbles. Doesn"t seem inspired.» (2)

10. Lecturer: Dr. Stefan Allard

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".
(Chemistry introduction)

16 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 6%
4»14 87%
5»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- His performance was good but his slides gave insufficient explanation. Since non-chemists don"t have a chemistry course book the slides should explain the phenomena completely or other hand outs should be given.» (3)
- Stefan is a good lecturer with pedagogical skills.» (4)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.78

Laboratory exercises

11. Laboratory exercises: understanding

Please indicate how the labs have increased your nuclear chemistry understanding, with 1 being "not at all" and 5 being "very much".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»3 17%
3»2 11%
4»8 47%
5»4 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.76 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The labs felt as they were for people with a chemistry background. The physics were very easy, but some of the chemisty I have never even heard of. And the book didn"t explain it either.» (2)
- The labs werent bad att all, the fact that they were performed long time before their subjects had been handeled in the course were very confusing. » (3)

12. Laboratory exercises: relevance

Please indicate how relevant to the course the labs have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»3 17%
3»2 11%
4»5 29%
5»7 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.94 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- To much chemistry» (2)
- Some of them felt relevant, but most of the time the labs felt separated from the course. The labs were chemistry, but the lectures was physics.» (2)

13. Laboratory exercises: Practical radiochemistry work - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 17%
4»9 52%
5»5 29%

Genomsnitt: 4.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Relevant not in terms of the course theory but essential for practical work.» (4)

14. Laboratory exercises: Practical radiochemistry work - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

17 svarande

1»2 11%
2»5 29%
3»7 41%
4»2 11%
5»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.7 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

15. Laboratory exercises: Practical radiochemistry work - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Dr. Stefan Allard, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»8 47%
5»9 52%

Genomsnitt: 4.52 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

16. Laboratory exercises: Measuring ionizing radiation - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

16 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 6%
4»7 43%
5»8 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.43 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- One of the few labs truly relevant for the course» (5)

17. Laboratory exercises: Measuring ionizing radiation - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

17 svarande

1»1 5%
2»5 29%
3»10 58%
4»1 5%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.64 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

18. Laboratory exercises: Measuring ionizing radiation - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Lic.Eng. Anna Gustafsson, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 17%
4»7 41%
5»7 41%

Genomsnitt: 4.23 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

19. Laboratory exercises: The Szilard-Chalmers Process - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

17 svarande

1»1 5%
2»2 11%
3»1 5%
4»10 58%
5»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.7 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

20. Laboratory exercises: The Szilard-Chalmers Process - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 5%
3»4 23%
4»5 29%
5»7 41%

Genomsnitt: 4.05 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too much chemistry focus» (4)
- Because it was done at the same time as "Growth and decay of the isomer Ba-137m" it was very hard to keep the two apart. Also the report was very demanding. Both a lot to do and hard to do it.» (5)

21. Laboratory exercises: The Szilard-Chalmers Process - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Lic.Eng. Sabrina Tietze, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

17 svarande

1»1 5%
2»3 17%
3»5 29%
4»6 35%
5»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.29 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Sets too hard demands on students, does not live up to the course"s demands on herself. Way overdue with correction of the reports. Doesn"t explain the lab very well during the experiments. Does not give non-chemists understanding of the chemistry behind it.» (1)
- Very high demands for the report!» (2)

22. Laboratory exercises: Growth and decay of the isomer Ba-137m - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 5%
3»2 11%
4»9 52%
5»5 29%

Genomsnitt: 4.05 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

23. Laboratory exercises: Growth and decay of the isomer Ba-137m - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 11%
3»6 35%
4»6 35%
5»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.58 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Very bad pedagogy to unify two labs into one session. Makes it completely impossible to distinguish between them in ones memory.» (4)
- Because it was done at the same time as "The Szilard-Chalmers Process" it was very hard to keep the two apart. Also the report was very demanding. Both a lot to do and hard to do it.» (5)

24. Laboratory exercises: Growth and decay of the isomer Ba-137m - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Lic.Eng. Sabrina Tietze, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

17 svarande

1»1 5%
2»3 17%
3»5 29%
4»6 35%
5»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.29 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Very high demands for the report!» (2)

25. Laboratory exercises: Gamma spectrometry - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

16 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»10 62%
5»6 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.37 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

26. Laboratory exercises: Gamma spectrometry - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

16 svarande

1»4 25%
2»3 18%
3»9 56%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.31 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

27. Laboratory exercises: Gamma spectrometry - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Lic.Eng. Elin Löfström-Engdahl if applicable, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

16 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 6%
3»1 6%
4»10 62%
5»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.06 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Good supervisor but much too detail oriented report grading.» (3)

28. Laboratory exercises: Chemical dosimetry - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 17%
4»9 52%
5»5 29%

Genomsnitt: 4.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

29. Laboratory exercises: Chemical dosimetry - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 11%
3»11 64%
4»4 23%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The theory was quite difficult for a non-chemist.» (4)

30. Laboratory exercises: Chemical dosimetry - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Lic.Eng. Hanna Hedström, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 5%
4»11 64%
5»5 29%

Genomsnitt: 4.23 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

31. Laboratory exercises: Reaction rate for isotopic exchange - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

17 svarande

1»3 17%
2»1 5%
3»3 17%
4»7 41%
5»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.35 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

32. Laboratory exercises: Reaction rate for isotopic exchange - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»14 82%
4»3 17%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.17 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Theory was rather hard to understand, but the actual laboratory work was quite easy.» (3)

33. Laboratory exercises: Reaction rate for isotopic exchange - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Dr. Natallia Torapava, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 5%
3»0 0%
4»11 64%
5»5 29%

Genomsnitt: 4.17 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Did her job as well as possible with such an irrelevant lab.» (4)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.7

Calculation exercises

34. Calculation exercises: relevance

Please grade how relevant the calculation exercises in general have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

16 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 12%
3»2 12%
4»6 37%
5»6 37%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Since all the exercises were very late in the course it was hard to remember the theory when it was time for the exercise. The exercises should have been placed earlier in the course!» (2)

35. Calculation exercises: difficulty

Please grade the difficulty of the calculation exercises in general, with 1 being easy and 5 hard.

16 svarande

1»1 6%
2»2 12%
3»7 43%
4»6 37%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.12 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Sometimes much foucus was put on writing down all values. It would have been better to write the equations and then "inserting given values we get...".» (3)

36. Calculation exercises: handouts

Have the handouts been good? Please grade them with 1 being "very bad" and 5 "very good".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»4 23%
4»3 17%
5»10 58%

Genomsnitt: 4.35 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Good with both hints and solutions (and summaries).» (5)
- Very pedagogical and helpful» (5)

37. Calculation exercises: number of occasions

Would you have liked more calculation exercises to cover the course?

17 svarande

Yes»7 41%
No»10 58%

Genomsnitt: 1.58

- The number of calculation exercises must be heavily increased. The calculation excercises had no chance in keeping up with the lectures.» (Yes)
- Because each exercises was given very little» (Yes)
- No, but exercises earlier in the course.» (No)
- Good as is.» (No)

38. Calculation exercises: Time for questions

Please indicate if there has been enough time for for questions, with 1 being "not enough time" and 5 being "very much time".

17 svarande

1»1 5%
2»2 11%
3»2 11%
4»6 35%
5»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.82 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

39. Calculation exercises: supervisors

Please grade the supervisor M.Sc. Lovisa Bauhn, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 5%
4»9 52%
5»7 41%

Genomsnitt: 4.35 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Pedagogical and clear.» (4)
- Well organized and easy to follow the calculations.» (5)

40. Calculation exercises: supervisors

Please grade the supervisor M.Sc. Marcus Hedberg, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 11%
3»5 29%
4»6 35%
5»4 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.7 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- A bit unstructured.» (2)
- Should use more symbols rather than number, makes it easier to follow the reasoning.» (2)
- A bit disorganized, would be better if the equation is shown better...» (4)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.9

General

41. General: Workload

Please indicate how you perceive the 7.5 hp workload, with 1 being "very low" and 5 "very high".

17 svarande

1»1 5%
2»0 0%
3»2 11%
4»8 47%
5»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 4.05 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The labs took some time. Otherwise the course wasn"t especially consuming.» (3)
- The 2.5 hp we got for the labs were very hard earned! It was a lot of work to write the reports. It would be better to decrease the workload of the labs and increase for example the number of lectures.» (5)
- This course is not a difficult course but the work load is nowhere near other 7.5 HP courses. You need to restructure this course!» (5)
- The course does not in any way equal 7.5 hp, the double would be more reasonable. The labs that should be 2.5 hp of 7.5 took 75% of the total time. » (5)

42. General: Textbook

Please grade the book "Radiochemistry and Nuclear Chemistry", with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

17 svarande

1»2 11%
2»2 11%
3»7 41%
4»5 29%
5»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.05 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The book is unstructured, and without any pedagogical effort put in. Important and interesting subjects are hardly explained at all. Many of the figures in the book is useless due to bad graphics or size.» (1)
- Quite boring to read. Hard to find a certain chapter (a more detailed table of contents - not just at the start of each chapter but in the beginning - would be good).» (2)
- I would like more derivations in some subjects. There was hard to answer some questions for the labs since the book often only states how things work, not why they work in the way they do.» (4)

43. General: Administration

Please grade the course administration in general, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»4 23%
3»1 5%
4»6 35%
5»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.82 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I believe there were to many people involved in the course.» (2)
- Unstructured.» (2)

44. General: Information

Please indicate how well course information was provided, with 1 being "terribly" and 5 "excellently".

17 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 17%
4»8 47%
5»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 4.17 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

45. Exam

Please indicate how well the exam reflected the course, with 1 being "poorly" and 5 "very well".

17 svarande

1»2 11%
2»3 17%
3»6 35%
4»4 23%
5»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.05 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- When no one in the class has finished the exam after 4 hours, the blame is on the examinator. And why didn"t anyone come to answer questions? » (1)
- The exam did not reflect the course at all. Several of the questions in the exam had not been handeled at all during the course, not in lectures nor in calculations exercises. » (1)
- No course representative (examiner/lecturer/...) came to visit the exam-room so there was no chance of asking questions about the exam (and some things were rather unclear). The exam was pretty hard too.» (2)
- Some parts which were heavily emphsized on the exam were hardly mentioned in the lectures and vice versa.» (2)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.63

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.74
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.68

Kursutvärderingssystem från