ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

SP1_12/13 Project management, BOM015

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-25 - 2012-11-11
Antal svar: 25
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33%
Kontaktperson: Christina Larsson»

1. Which programme do you belong to?*

25 svarande

International Project Management»12 48%
Design and Construction Project Management»12 48%
Erasmus student or else»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 1.56

2. One question about the course in general*

Estimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of this statement, where
1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement
5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement

Matrisfråga

The general impression is that the course was very good*
25 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»14 56%
4»7 28%
5»4 16%
I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 3.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

3. Five questions about the course

Estimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of these statements, where
1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement
5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement

Matrisfråga

- The examination can be improved. There were too many questions and problems with not appropriate time.»
- Extreme amount of errors on the exam by examinator, this is not acceptable when we are sitting there writing. How hard can it be to double check the exam?»
- The calculations on the test were in level with the problem sets but more advanced than the ones the teacher had gone through during class which seems strange to me.»
- I think the program manager has to re evaluate this course because I think it"s very sad that as a student you"re forced to put this course aside to be able to do all the work in Managing organizations in the construction industry. This course feels more relevant and fun to study but oh simply can"t and I think you should be able to choose which course you feel that you want to put extra effort into. »
- It was very bad that there were so many mistakes on the...»
- the course was good managed»

It was clear to me what the learning outcomes of the course were
24 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 4%
3»7 29%
4»10 41%
5»6 25%
I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 3.87

The examination and the aims of the course were well related
23 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 4%
3»6 26%
4»13 56%
5»3 13%
I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 3.78

The course was very well administered
24 svarande

1»0 0%
2»3 12%
3»5 20%
4»10 41%
5»6 25%
I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 3.79

I felt that the course had a high degree of significance for my education
24 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»5 20%
4»13 54%
5»6 25%
I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 4.04

The course demanded a high degree of work effort
24 svarande

1»3 12%
2»2 8%
3»8 33%
4»6 25%
5»5 20%
I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 3.33

4. What elements of the course should definitely remain?

- The lectures with Petra were very interesting and clear, so they definitely should remain!»
- Lectures by Petra Bosch,the live project, problem-solving sessions»
- The live workshop»
- Live Project»
- The live project. »
- Live workshop»
- The calculation exercises by Sven»
- Live project»
- -»
- the live project»
- Live workshop»
- Live Project Workshop»
- The live project»
- The live project»
- The live project»
- theory»
- live project»
- The live project workshop. »

5. Were there any elements missing in the course?

- Group assignment instead of the theoretical exam.»
- Problems could be more discussed and solved »
- More lectures related to the real life. More like the workshop »
- Group assignment»
- Theory and principles of lean and agile project management.»
- problem solving techniques were not so clear»
- I don"t know»
- -»
- needed assignments»
- Seminars »
- Usage of technology. Gant chart and thime estimations is done on computers now adays? Why don"t we use it?..»
- Time to discuss the theory with other students and teachers. Like seminars.»
- Some sort of a hand-in»
- quality management»
- There should be some supervised lessons were students can ask questions about the part Sven had. All the problem sets. »

6. What, if anything, do you think should be changed in the course?

- I would change the way of passing the course. In my opinion the exam should be only about the calculations and the theory should be checked by some project or group assignment. I found a bit useless memorizing all of those information. It is mor important to use them in practice than remember for example all of the steps of "problem solving".»
- The Live project can be improved by informing the students to make teams beforehand. The exam can be more efficient by better scheduling and not putting it one day before the mockey exam.»
- The corse was in the background of the MOCI. Felt like that one was full time and this one was half speed. »
- Overall, I think the course should have a more general approach that reflects project management in various businesses. This course tends to be a bit too focused on civil engineering and construction, which is a petty.»
- There should be more focus on problems, how to solve them and techniques»
- The lecture had a tendancy to be a bit dull.»
- -»
- Only written exam is not enough for the grades»
- In the exam there were many calculations that take a lot of time to perform but they were worth very many points which should be changed.»
- I think that there should be some group assignment during the course instead of the theoretical part of the exam»
- to much problem set»

7. Which parts/elements of the course were the most important for your learning outcome?

If there is anything missing in the list below, please let us know! (Comments)

Matrisfråga

- -»
- There were many mistakes in the exam, if we come prepared then the teacher should be prepared to with an exam without lots of flaws. I did not have time to finish the whole test, if it were not for all the interruptions I would have been able to.»
- the cource was almost good»
- The course was all to easy to pass. Should be more advanced.»

Lectures
24 svarande

-»1 4%
OK»10 43%
+»7 30%
++»5 21%
Not relevant / I dont know»1

Genomsnitt: 2.69

Exercises
22 svarande

-»0 0%
OK»6 33%
+»9 50%
++»3 16%
Not relevant / I dont know»4

Genomsnitt: 2.83

Live Project Workshop
24 svarande

-»0 0%
OK»5 22%
+»5 22%
++»12 54%
Not relevant / I dont know»2

Genomsnitt: 3.31

Project work
23 svarande

-»1 9%
OK»4 36%
+»5 45%
++»1 9%
Not relevant / I dont know»12

Genomsnitt: 2.54

Ask questions
23 svarande

-»1 5%
OK»10 52%
+»6 31%
++»2 10%
Not relevant / I dont know»4

Genomsnitt: 2.47

Hand -ins
23 svarande

-»1 10%
OK»4 40%
+»4 40%
++»1 10%
Not relevant / I dont know»13

Genomsnitt: 2.5

Examination
24 svarande

-»2 9%
OK»7 31%
+»8 36%
++»5 22%
Not relevant / I dont know»2

Genomsnitt: 2.72

Team work
24 svarande

-»2 10%
OK»5 26%
+»7 36%
++»5 26%
Not relevant / I dont know»5

Genomsnitt: 2.78

Independent work
24 svarande

-»0 0%
OK»8 44%
+»8 44%
++»2 11%
Not relevant / I dont know»6

Genomsnitt: 2.66

Occasions with critique (feedback)
23 svarande

-»3 23%
OK»5 38%
+»5 38%
++»0 0%
Not relevant / I dont know»10

Genomsnitt: 2.15

Guest lectures
23 svarande

-»0 0%
OK»7 43%
+»7 43%
++»2 12%
Not relevant / I dont know»7

Genomsnitt: 2.68

External study visits
23 svarande

-»4 36%
OK»5 45%
+»1 9%
++»1 9%
Not relevant / I dont know»12

Genomsnitt: 1.9

Other element
19 svarande

-»0 0%
OK»7 100%
+»0 0%
++»0 0%
Not relevant / I dont know»12

Genomsnitt: 2

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.6

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.6
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.65

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från