Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Applied organic molecular spectroscopy, KOK032, sp1 2012

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-15 - 2012-11-04
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 42%
Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Kemiteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 18%
Around 20 hours/week»4 36%
Around 25 hours/week»3 27%
Around 30 hours/week»2 18%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 27%
100%»8 72%

Genomsnitt: 4.72

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 36%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 9%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 42%
Yes, definitely»1 14%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 9%
Large extent»6 54%
Great extent»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»7 63%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 11%
Rather well»6 66%
Very well»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 9%
Very good»10 90%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 9%
Very well»8 72%
I did not seek cooperation»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 4.09

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 90%
High»1 9%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»8 72%
High»3 27%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 18%
Good»6 54%
Excellent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 4.09 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Gunnar and Andreas for being, frankly, totally awesome at lectures + for helping out with problems and questions at off hours. Also "known and unknown sample". The task was just difficult enough. You had a lot of trouble solving it and had to think long and hard, go through the course book several times, before you found the right pussle peices and solve it. I learned loads from just ruling out different ideas and more from finnaly solving it! »
- Unknown sample»
- Andreas as teaching the tutorials»
- The repetition lecture was very good. »
- The exercises and the project»
- The problem classes»
- Fun projects»
- The literature study assignment was very interesting and a good insight to the uses of spectroscopy, so this should definitely be preserved. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Mass Spectroscopy in general should try and work on its manners and stop harrassing students (I think I saw a boy in my class cry after the first MS problem lecture, seriously!). MS need to chill and try be more lax. »
- A better organized exam. The questions were very good. However, it didn"t say how much points some of the questions gave. The points to pass and full mark that were given on the first page of the exam didn"t correspond to the actual full mark. It stated that full mark was 54 p. But the theory part contained 44 p ( and then I"m not including the two questions in the theory part that didn"t say how many points they gave). This would mean that part B and the two questions in part A would give a maximum of 10 p. This seams very unlikely since you (according to the first page) needed 9 points to pass part B. Then there also should be informative texts on part B that states what you are supposed to do. On this exam you just got a bunch of spectrum without any information. The spectrum should be clearly marked so that you know which spectra corresponds to which assignment. It should also be stated how much points each question gives. It is extremely bad that you don"t know the correct amount of points you need to pass the exam.»
- The lecture plan, it was hard with all the spectras during class, maybe it could be easier with a ppt that actually marked the differencies and so on»
- Perhaps fixed dates to hand the projects in»

16. Additional comments

- I love rainbows and marshmallows. Also, this bunny rabbit! (/) (. .) SOOO CUTE <3<3<3 c(")(")»
- It is a pity that the exam was so poorly executed when the rest of the course has been so well organized and pedagogical.»
- Very good exercises!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.09

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.09
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.77

Kursutvärderingssystem från