ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Humanoid robotics 2012, TIF160, FIM800

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-15 - 2012-11-10
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 77%
Kontaktperson: Krister Wolff»

1. How do you rate the disposition of the course (two weeks of lectures, followed by five weeks of robotics lab work)?

14 svarande

Very good»4 28%
Good»5 35%
No opinion»1 7%
Bad»3 21%
Very bad»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.42 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- it was interesting (especially the videos) but not very informative as most of the content was common sense» (No opinion)
- I was hoping for more lectures.» (Bad)
- The lectures did not contain any useful material, just giving a very vague overview. More time for the project would reduce the stress.» (Bad)
- I learn little. I spend most of time searching online. I think learn things by myself is not efficient. I think the reason why there should courses is that the teacher could help you to learn much quicker than if learning things by yourself.» (Bad)

2. Are the teaching goals of the course clear to you?

14 svarande

Very clear»3 21%
Clear»6 42%
No opinion»1 7%
Unclear»4 28%
Very unclear»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- For the short timespan there is little to be learned. Everything happens in hurry and with very little support. Expectations are way too high. If a team hits a problem, there is too little time to change strategy.» (Unclear)

3. Are the teaching goals of the robotics project clear to you?

14 svarande

Very clear»5 35%
Clear»5 35%
No opinion»2 14%
Unclear»2 14%
Very unclear»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.07 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It is quite clear for the teams that are lucky enough to be successful. Every team has to start from scratch, and the result seems to be going to waste as well.» (Unclear)

4. How do you rate the level of difficulty of the lectures?

14 svarande

Very difficult»0 0%
Difficult»1 7%
No opinion»6 42%
Easy»5 35%
Very easy»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.57 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- There was nothing much helpful. It would be much better to have a good overview of the available hardware and software and what previous teams have done and how they solved - practical and invaluable information that would help teams to avoid mistakes.» (No opinion)
- Did not attend lectures due to schedule collision.» (No opinion)

5. How do you rate the quality of the lectures?

14 svarande

Very good»2 14%
Good»7 50%
No opinion»2 14%
Bad»3 21%
Very bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Good that many examples (esp. videos) were given. Elaborated slides, available always on time. » (Good)
- I think more time should be spent on actual algorithms or concept description, and less time on showing films of robots.» (Bad)

6. How did you like the home assignment "Hubert kinematics"?

14 svarande

Very good»2 14%
Good»6 42%
No opinion»3 21%
Bad»3 21%
Very bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Worked straight forward and lecture served as a good example, more a matter of diligence. » (Good)
- the assignment was too straight forward» (Bad)
- The taks itself needed little thinking, but a lot of calculations.» (Bad)

7. How did you like the home assignment "Humanoid essay"?

14 svarande

Very good»1 7%
Good»5 35%
No opinion»5 35%
Bad»2 14%
Very bad»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.78 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It was very interesting to get to dive in and investigate this more in depth.» (Very good)
- we never had to write essays before so it was an interesting and new concept» (Good)
- You now should have received a high variousity of essays. Maybe more cues are required to make it more comparable. » (No opinion)
- An essay is not appropriate. There is no time to work on it, and again the expectations are extremely high.» (Bad)
- This is like writing a scientific fiction.» (Bad)

8. How did you like the (mandatory) project planning lecture?

14 svarande

Very good»1 7%
Good»6 42%
No opinion»4 28%
Bad»3 21%
Very bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.64 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- in the beginning of the course it seemed not very helpful but in the end it turned out to be very useful» (Good)
- Possibly too long/ too much.» (Good)
- First, it felt a little school-like and not necessary, but finally it helped a lot for carrying out the project! » (Good)
- The idea is good, but maybe a little overdone considering the dimension of the project.» (No opinion)
- some planning tasks were a little bit disproportionate in relation to the project» (No opinion)
- Nothing wrong with the lecture/exercise but humanoid robotics is a vast subject. No need to bring in an extra field.» (Bad)
- I don"t find much value in that. It was unclear why this particular methodology was chosen and if it was appropriate for such agile project at all.» (Bad)

9. How did you like the robotics project?

14 svarande

Very good»9 64%
Good»3 21%
No opinion»1 7%
Bad»1 7%
Very bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.57 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- High motivation due to own project idea to work on and super team, paired with results. » (Very good)
- fun, learned a lot» (Very good)
- Too little information about the software and hardware was given before requiring a finished project proposal that is set in stone. » (Bad)

10. To what extent have the robotics project increased your ability to work in a team?

14 svarande

Very much»0 0%
Much»4 28%
No opinion»5 35%
Little»3 21%
Very little»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.21 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

11. Do the teachers provide enough support for the students to carry out the robotics project in the course?

14 svarande

Too much»0 0%
Yes»10 71%
No opinion»1 7%
To little»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- However some resources are not very good when it comes to the Bioloid.» (Yes)
- We didn"t demand it that much, but if, we got well provided. » (No opinion)
- If the teacher could provide more technical support to the robotics project, it will be great!» (To little)

12. How did you like to work with the Bioloid robot during the course (if applicable)?

12 svarande

Very good»1 8%
Good»4 33%
No opinion»6 50%
Bad»1 8%
Very bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.58 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- A lot of time wasted due to the poor quality of documentation of more advanced features. » (Good)
- not used» (No opinion)

13. How did you like to work with the Hubert robot during the course (if applicable)?

12 svarande

Very good»2 16%
Good»3 25%
No opinion»6 50%
Bad»1 8%
Very bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The robot was fine, but it should have been thouroghly checked before given out.» (Good)
- We were lucky that it worked out fast to get him run. But first cable, then servo problems occurred, so unfortunately, he was not totally stable. » (Good)

14. Would you recomend this course to other students?

14 svarande

Yes, absolutely!»6 42%
Yes»5 35%
No opinion»1 7%
No»1 7%
No, absolutely not!»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- have already done so =)» (Yes, absolutely!)

15. What additions or changes (if any) would you like to see in the course?

- maybe a better introduction how to start working with the robots - we spend nearly two weeks on finding out how to communicate the robot, a short intriduction into c#»
- More lectures describing as many parts of the field as possible. Describing the state of the art in respective areas.»
- More advanced lectures, focused on actual algorithms.»
- Maybe a seminar discussing the questions in the essays?»
- More practical information on hardware and software (what works and what doesn"t). Less expectations on the projects (saying that teams of previous years were amazingly successful does not help). Leave more space and time for mistakes. Monitor the progress (in informal way) to identify potential problems. »
- More instructions on lab work. Maybe more lectures teaching some technical details of working on the robots may help!»
- Better and more timely planning of presentation day. Labs don"t need to be supervised for more than the first hour. More un- or minimally supervised scheduled lab time would be nice. Instead there should be more lectures.»
- The Hubert kinematics homeproblem was not very interesting. It did not add much in term of learning and added an extra amount of work that prevented me to give the best I could in the other 2 projects.»

16. General comments and suggestions about the course (if any):

- Nice lectures I just want more of them.»
- For doing the robot project, it would be much better to determine a goal like creating a soccer robot, rescue robot and etc and then break down it into different projects and ask each group to do a part of that. By the current way, some diverse and endless works would be done. »
- Very fun and interesting course and very helpful teachers. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.51
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.51
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.38

Kursutvärderingssystem från