ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Surface chemistry, KTK095, sp1, 2012

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-15 - 2012-11-04
Antal svar: 19
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 47%
Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Kemiteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

19 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 26%
Around 20 hours/week»7 36%
Around 25 hours/week»6 31%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.21

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

19 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 26%
100%»14 73%

Genomsnitt: 4.73

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

19 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»6 31%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 5%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 5%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»11 57%

Genomsnitt: 2.89

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 92%
No, the goals are set too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 21%
Yes, definitely»7 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 15%
Large extent»6 31%
Great extent»10 52%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»3 16%
Some extent»5 27%
Large extent»7 38%
Great extent»3 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

19 svarande

Very badly»2 10%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»9 47%
Very well»7 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

19 svarande

Very poor»1 5%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 5%
Very good»13 68%
I did not seek help»4 21%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

19 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»8 42%
Very well»11 57%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

11. How was the course workload?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»12 66%
High»5 27%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

12. How was the total workload this study period?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 52%
High»7 36%
Too high»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

19 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 10%
Adequate»1 5%
Good»11 57%
Excellent»5 26%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Martins lectures are very good. I also really liked the questions after each lecture. They were very pedagogic and helpful as a learning exercise for the exam. The laborations were very helpful aswell. »
- The learning outcomes were very good on Martin"s part. The labs were very good.»
- Everything in the course»
- Martin Andersson as lecturer»
- I like the visit to Akzo Nobel at the beginning of the term. It really got me into the understanding of the application of the course. »
- The exam was much better than the previous ones!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- it would be better if they could use the coursepage instead for sending everything to the mail»
- No laborations should be held in the last week, 5 days before the exam! They could instead have started earlier, the first week, and finished earlier. Also having lectures containing completely new information and corresponding to 20% of the exam should not be held in the last week before the exam!»
- Jan-erics part was way to large on the exam. It"s not reasonable to have 18 % of the total exam on his part that was 6 days before the actual exam. I was chocked when I saw this as I had not had the time to study his part that elaboratly as clearly was needed. The course material is also quite useless. I can honestly say that I hardly learned anything from the course book. It was all from lectures and the laborations. »
- Maybe some extra classes with possibility to make exercises on your own hand and the oppurtunity to ask questions.»
- Don"t have labs so late in the period. No one wants a labreport to be due in the exam period or just before. A course home page whould be better! It is difficult to find all the different lecture slides in the mail box. »
- Inclusion of an ungraded midterm exam»
- Better information about the laborations»
- More practical labs»
- The slides should be sent earlier, not only one day before the lecture.»

16. Additional comments

- Course homepage was not used at all, the lectures were instead email. This is a very messy system and it"s hard to get any structure and finding the right things to print. Also no final lecture for asking questions or go through of an old exam was held! VERY BAD! Especially since the structure of the exam was completely different from previous years. Also the possibility to ask questions was very bad, email response was very slow. It also seems unfair that previous years 18/40 points on the exam was required for passing and this year it was 20/40. Any motivation for why this year you suddenly would not pass with the same credit as someone last year would have passed with?! And again, adding a new part to the course, which was not at all in the exams previous years, is held the last week and correspond to 20% of exam is just not fair. The worst part was still not being able to ask questions in the end.. bad teaching!»
- Martin Andersson is a very good teacher and explains very good.»
- The lab TA helped us to understand the course materials a lot. Also, when we got questions, it is a channel for us to ask about it. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75

Kursutvärderingssystem från