Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

The synthesis, properties and structures of solid state materials, KOO092, sp 1, 2012

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-15 - 2012-11-04
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 46%
Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Kemiteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 23%
Around 20 hours/week»5 38%
Around 25 hours/week»3 23%
Around 30 hours/week»2 15%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 38%
100%»8 61%

Genomsnitt: 4.61

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 15%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 7%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 23%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 53%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 90%
No, the goals are set too high»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

12 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 33%
Yes, definitely»6 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 7%
Large extent»7 53%
Great extent»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 25%
Large extent»8 66%
Great extent»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»1 7%
Rather badly»3 23%
Rather well»4 30%
Very well»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 3

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 25%
Very good»7 58%
I did not seek help»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.91

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 30%
Very well»9 69%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

11. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 76%
High»3 23%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

12. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»8 61%
High»4 30%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 7%
Adequate»2 15%
Good»8 61%
Excellent»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.84 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The laboratory exercises»
- The labs were fun and you learned from them.»
- Laboration and Course syllabus and prevailing course syllabi»
- The teachers.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- it would be better if they could use the coursepage instead for sendning everthing to the mail»
- More exercise-lectures where problem solving is the main part but also the teacher should go through some examples in the beginning of the lecture. The exam was somewhat more difficult than previous years and even if the responsible teacher for the course changed, the level of the exam should be the same!»
- There should be a course home page! And a syllabis!»
- Courses on bonding and superconductivity should be dealt with more detail and more time must be given to the same»
- handouts or slides form "Bonding and electronic structure" and "Superconductivity"»
- The lectures professor Itai Panas gave were very interesting, although to me they seemed not clear enough to be asked direct questions about at the exam. »
- Better use of the webpage.»

16. Additional comments

- Because the syllabus were nonexisting it was hard to know what the learning goals were. Most questions on the exam felt very branched and not very general. It felt like it was hard to pass, because the question were on such a high level. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.84

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.84
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.71

Kursutvärderingssystem från