ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Ecology for engineers, KKM022, sp 1, 2012

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-15 - 2012-11-04
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 83%
Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Kemiteknik med fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 20%
Around 20 hours/week»6 60%
Around 25 hours/week»1 10%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 30%
100%»7 70%

Genomsnitt: 4.7

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 10%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 90%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

4. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 20%
Yes, definitely»6 60%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Really good exam. It captured the essentials of almost every lecture» (Yes, definitely)

5. Do you think the Eco-test was a good thing?

The Eco-test aims to get you started early in the course, and to increase the number of opportunities for collecting grading points

10 svarande

Not good at all»0 0%
Good but too difficult»0 0%
A good thing»10 100%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- an important part of studying was required for the eco-test, which was very useful in the preparation for the final exam» (A good thing)
- However, it is a huge amount of work. We all spent all evenings + week end reading. It was interesting, but giving more time would be better ,)» (A good thing)
- The Eco test was a good thing, but it was a little bit difficult to manage the time with the first project.» (A good thing)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 20%
Large extent»5 50%
Great extent»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.1 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

7. To what extent did you appeciate the many small projects and exercises?

The projects aim to increase you learning throughout the course, and to increase the number of oppertunities for collecting grading points

10 svarande

Not much, should be changed»0 0%
To some extent, but it was too many»1 10%
It was appreciated»2 20%
It was highly appreciated»7 70%

Genomsnitt: 3.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- To increase benefit from guest lectures, I propose to begin the guest lecture with a seminar students prepare on the topic. By doing so, the guest will have better knowledge about what we know, and what we want to know, and will make the whole thing becoming more interactive. Indeed, sometimes guest lectures wwere kind of boring, but only because things we already knew were repeated, and not enough time were saved for discussions, propositions, imagining sustainable solutions» (It was highly appreciated)
- It is good. You look deeper in the subject with the projects.» (It was highly appreciated)
- Since it was a really small class it made us come closer together and it felt like a more homogenous group than a class.» (It was highly appreciated)

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»1 10%
Large extent»7 70%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

9. How well did the course administration work (e.g. access to materials/handouts/information)?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 30%
Very well»7 70%

Genomsnitt: 3.7 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

10. How useful was the course web page?

The web page aims to distribute information, updates and course materials throughout the course, however, it requires that students frequently visit the page.

10 svarande

Not very useful»0 0%
Useful»4 40%
Very useful»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

11. How well did you appreciate the teaching by Ulrika Palme?

10 svarande

Not so much»0 0%
Moderate»0 0%
Good»4 40%
Excellent»6 60%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.6

12. How well did you appreciate the teaching by Linus Hammar?

10 svarande

Not so much»0 0%
Moderate»0 0%
Good»4 40%
Excellent»6 60%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.6

13. How well did you appreciate the teaching by Gunilla Clancy?

10 svarande

Not so much»0 0%
Moderate»2 20%
Good»5 50%
Excellent»3 30%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.1

14. How well did you appreciate the selection of guest lecturers and their performance?

10 svarande

Not a good selection of topics or lecturers»0 0%
A good selection of topics but performance could improve»3 30%
A good selection and performance»4 40%
An excellent selection and performance»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3

- as I said, make it more interactive. » (A good selection of topics but performance could improve)
- I argue to keep the lecture about ethics. However, I don"t think it should be included in the exam. It is good to have the awareness that it excists but I think it"s a too "fussy" subject to be included in an engineer course.» ( A good selection and performance)

15. How well did you appreciate the Organic Farm field trip?

10 svarande

Not so much»0 0%
Moderate»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»9 100%
I did not participate»1

Genomsnitt: 4

- not very useful for me, but funny» (Excellent)
- maybe next time visit both kind of farms at the same day to compare the different kinds of farms. (Eco and commercial)» (Excellent)

16. How well did you appreciate the Forestry field trip?

10 svarande

Not so much»0 0%
Moderate»1 10%
Good»5 50%
Excellent»4 40%
I did not participate»0

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- very interresting, and funny» (Excellent)
- nice trip!» (Excellent)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.46

Study climate

17. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»10 100%
I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

18. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 10%
Rather well»1 10%
Very well»8 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.7 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- doing projects with nordic people is weird,no looking for more contact than needed, want to have it finished quickly,according to me and to my little experience (only few samples of swedes and finns)» (Very well)

19. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 40%
High»6 60%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

20. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 30%
High»5 50%
Too high»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.85

Summarizing questions

21. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»4 40%
Excellent»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- However, it seems difficult to me to valorize the course on a professional level. "yes i have learned at chalmers that we should not cut the trees, and that energy and matter is flowing in a cycle" ,) I am kidding, of course, but there is a part of thruth» (Excellent)

22. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Almost everything...»
- Guest lecturers and field trips»
- all elements marked above as "good" and "excellent"»
- farm trip, projects»
- the presentation from linus where he explained how he managed to travel to mozambique during his pHD ,)»
- All the project works»
- the Eco-test, the forest and ecofarm trip, and all the presentations.»
- study trips»
- definetely keep the projects and the feild trips. It is really essential to keep the more practical task to make the course even more interesting.»

23. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- I´,d like to change the forest trip for a trip to the North Sea.»
- Contrast organic farm with a conventional one»
- starting courses at 8.00 am»
- some guest lectures»
- giving more time before the first test»
- anything»
- MA scenarios»
- A lecture of the connection to engineering could be really to increase students understanding to different engineering processes.»

24. Additional comments

- Good work»
- Try to connect more the lessons»
- I had really enjoyed the course, thank you!»
- The course exceeded my expectations and I really found it interesting most of the time. That has to do with the good teachers and the practical activeties during the course!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.59
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.58
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.86

Kursutvärderingssystem från