Visa resultat

Preliminary plant design, KBT156, sp 1, 2012

1. What type of student are you?

Master student»		9		100%
Exchange student»		0		0%
Other»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1

2. If you are a Master student - are you?

Swedish»		9		100%
International»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 1

Your own effort

3. How many hours per week did you spend on this course? We mean total time, i.e. in and out of class. Estimate an average over the entire study period.

At most 15 hours/week»		0		0%
Around 20 hours/week»		4		44%
Around 25 hours/week»		2		22%
Around 30 hours/week»		3		33%
At least 35 hours/week»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

4. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

0%»		0		0%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		1		11%
75%»		2		22%
100%»		6		66%

Genomsnitt: 4.55 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

5. Were the course goals reasonable considering your background?

No, the goals were set too low»		0		0%
Yes, the goals seemed reasonable»		9		100%
No, the goals were set too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2

6. Did the assignments, project and comprehension test assess whether you reached the goals?

No, not at all.»		0		0%
To some extent»		2		22%
Yes, definitely»		7		77%
No opinion»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.4

Teaching and course administration

7. How was the subject coverage of the lectures?

They covered too little material»		0		0%
About right»		8		88%
They covered somewhat too much material»		0		0%
They covered too much material»		0		0%
Don"t know/did not attend»		1		11%

Genomsnitt: 2.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

8. To what extent did the lectures help your learning?

Small extent»		1		11%
To some extent»		2		22%
Large extent»		6		66%
Great extent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.55 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

9. Overall how would you rate the quality of the lectures?

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		0		0%
Adequate»		2		25%
Good»		4		50%
Excellent»		2		25%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The lectures about hetintegration was a bit unstructured and hard to follow.» (Good)

10. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		3		33%
To some extent»		3		33%
Large extent»		3		33%
Great extent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Didn"t buy the book. » (Small extent)

11. Did the course literature and handout material adequately cover the course content?

No, it was inadequate.»		1		11%
Yes, it was adequate.»		7		77%
No opinion»		1		11%

Genomsnitt: 2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- A book that covers alot of material but not so good for the specific details that the course contained.» (No, it was inadequate.)
- The book is one of the best I ever bought on chalmers, but its not really necessary for the course.» (Yes, it was adequate.)

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		0		0%
Rather badly»		0		0%
Rather well»		6		66%
Vey well»		3		33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.67

Course Project

13. What was your general impression of the course project?

Very Negative»		0		0%
Mostly Negative»		0		0%
Mostly Positive»		6		75%
Very Positive»		2		25%

Genomsnitt: 3.25 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The part before the heatintegartion was good but the heat integration felt like there were too little time to do all the steps.» (Mostly Positive)
- The energy part was too large in the project.» (Mostly Positive)
- To slow tempo in the beginning. Maybe a better time distribution can be done since the later parts in the project takes more time.» (Mostly Positive)
- One of the best courses in the entire education. Summes up everything. Should be mandatory for mpisc!» (Very Positive)

14. Did the course project contribute to your understanding of the different aspects involved in the preliminary design of a plant?

No, not at all.»		0		0%
A small contribution.»		0		0%
A large contribution.»		9		100%
A very large contribution, ie much better than lectures etc.»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

15. How well did collaboration work within your project group?

Very poorly»		0		0%
Reasonably well»		1		11%
Very well»		8		88%
No opinion»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

16. Was the objective for your project clearly defined?

No, not at all»		0		0%
Yes, it was adequate»		9		100%

Genomsnitt: 2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

17. How was the quality of instruction and help that you recieved for the project?

It was very poor»		0		0%
It was poor»		0		0%
It was good»		8		88%
It was very good»		1		11%

Genomsnitt: 3.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Except the part that there are no communications between the different teachers. Something needs to be changed since Gunnar and Matteo cannot have different claims on the project and its variables! Also I think the energy part is taking to much space. I think in an overview course like this, the details and demands from Matteo is to high compared to the other areas. Matteo is a good teacher that really believes in his students, and I think the problem is purely a course layout issue. » (It was good)
- Again the heat integration part was hard since it involved many steps and thety were not always so good described. If the procedure for the heat integration were more strucured and maybe more described before starting to work with it, it would probably be easier to perform. » (It was good)
- It was good but there could be a better connection between the process and energy parts. You had to redo some things to get it to work in the energy part. It should have been clear from the beginning so you don"t have to do the same things over and over and over...» (It was good)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.84

Study Climate

18. In the course how were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		0		0%
Rather good»		3		33%
Very good»		6		66%
I did not seek help»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

19. How was the course workload?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		3		33%
High»		6		66%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

20. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		3		33%
High»		6		66%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- since 3 courses» (High)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.66

Summarizing Questions

21. What is your general impression of the course?

Very poor»		0		0%
Poor»		0		0%
Adequate»		0		0%
Good»		5		55%
Excellent»		4		44%

Genomsnitt: 4.44 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- One of my favorite courses ..Very interesting course covering alot of topics including things that can be really needed later on.» (Excellent)

22. Do you think the course should cover more or fewer topics?

More»		1		11%
Reasonable as it is»		8		88%
Fewer»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.88 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Maybe it will be too much with more topics.» (Reasonable as it is)

23. What should definitely be preserved next year?

24. What should definitely be changed next year?

25. Additional comments: