|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Advanced chemical reaction engineering, KBT115, sp 1, 2012Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2012-10-15 - 2012-11-04 Antal svar: 17 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 56% Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Kemiteknik med fysik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.29 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.7 Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.11 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.15 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.13 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?15 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.6 Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.82 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.58 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.35 Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.23 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.52 11. How was the course workload?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.7 12. How was the total workload this study period?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.76 Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.52 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Guest lecture and lab visit.»- The assignemts, from them I acctually learned the whole course. I also want to say thanks to Derek that always seems to have time to help us!» - The assignments was really good for learning so they should be preserved. » - I learned a lot by doing the assignments and i think they are good» - study visit» - The assignments» - the assignments that allow to understand and practice but maybe putting bonus points on them for the final exam because they are really hard and take a lot of time.» - The assignments are good because they make sure that you"re studying during the whole period. » - Keep the assignments, it is a really good opportunety to implement what you learn during classes.» - The assignments» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The location of lecture. I prefer the lecture hall at kd.»- The project is quite hard to actually follow. What is supposed to do, how much time and so on. I thought origin that the project would be very easy and short, but it"s not, it"s takes a lot of time! I think the most problematic part with the project can be solved by: 1. Write some guidelines on what is needed to be done. 2. Muzamal needs to know whats needed to be done, for know he accepted everything that looked reasonable. I also think that the level on the project must be higher. It is totally unacceptable that it is possible to pass the project without having a working matlab code!» - The project was not good and I didn"t learn anything new during this work. The most timeconsuming part was to find the physical properties and it felt like a waste of time. It would be much better if you wrote a program by yourself and not just changing in an already existing program. So I think the project maybe could be more simple but that you actually write your own program since that would be better both for understanding and learning. The exam was way to hard and way to timeconsuming than what you actually have time for in 4 hours! You cannot do an exam that is almost impossible to do in the set time. So either the exam needs to be shorter/not contain so many questions or the exam time has to be extended! The "drill master" in the project and in the assignment should be able to answer questions about these. This was not the case and I think that if you are involved with a course and are taking care of assignments you should have caculated these yourself so that student can ask questions, how are we going to learn otherwise? This should really be taken into account next year!» - The project. It is to much work with the matlab-program and no time for understanding the reaction engineering part of it. Maybe a smaller project where you write the code yourself could be better?» - The level of the examination was unexpected. More complicated and different compared with previous year. The project could be maybe different. Maybe better to write own MATLAB code or something.» - The project which in the end consists only in changing values on matlab and don"t really teach anything new on the course subject.» - Put to much time on assignments and MATLAB project, should at least get some bonus point for the exam from these projects. » - The project in Matlab took a lot of time but did not learn me anything. » - The exam! It would be a good thing to have it like CFD. An exam after 3-4 weeks, pass or fail. Then focus on the project, which makes it much more interesting. If you want higher grade it can be optional to do another exam (written or orally).» - The project, one would have learned a lot more by writing parts of the code than just searching for constants. It would have been great if the project assistant was able to answer our questions about how to and which equations/constants to change.» - The project, just take time and i don"t think i learned something.» 16. Additional comments- I am satisfied with the course attended.»- I am pretty happy with the course and what i learned from it» - I think the exam was much harder then the older exams available on the webpage. » - The sheet of how the project report should be formed should be handed out at the start of the project!!! Also, to involve four people during simulations is very unproductive, two people can sit and work on the report during that time and then swich to simulations. Again, give the project more significans!» - Very intersting material! Too hard exam.» Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.52 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.63
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%