ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Biomaterials, TIF125, sp 1, 2012

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-15 - 2012-11-04
Antal svar: 19
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 46%
Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Bioteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 5%
Around 20 hours/week»6 33%
Around 25 hours/week»8 44%
Around 30 hours/week»2 11%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

18 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»6 33%
100%»12 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

18 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 16%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 16%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»12 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»16 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

16 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 37%
Yes, definitely»8 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»13 72%
Great extent»5 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»12 66%
Great extent»6 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

18 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»9 50%
Very well»9 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

18 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 27%
Very good»8 44%
I did not seek help»5 27%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

18 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 11%
Rather well»5 27%
Very well»11 61%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

11. How was the course workload?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»11 61%
High»7 38%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

12. How was the total workload this study period?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»11 61%
High»7 38%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

18 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 5%
Good»7 38%
Excellent»10 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The article reviews are interesting The site visits are great as well»
- Julies lectures were very good, the site visit was very interesting and I enjoyed learning more about critically viewing research articles. It was also good to have the quiz in the middle of the period, it helped both in following the course after the quiz better and will help considerably when I study to the exam.»
- article review»
- The teacher ! Excellent, passionate...and the booktext is very interesting. The entire lectures with Ms Gold are good. The article review in group is a very good idea. The Homeworks are very usefull.»
- The article review sessions and the site visits»
- Keep everything, the lecturers, site visits and reviews. »
- Julie is an excellent lecturer in the fact that she inspires and explains everything thouroughly! She has a tendency of speaking too long, but the quality of the lecture is so good that it doesnt really matter. But anyway the lecture times should be kept (for our sakes). The site visit was great! The course litterature was great as well. The article reviews were reeeally good! It really felt like you learned a lot while you got insight into todays research!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- nothing»
- The lecture about protein interaction was boring and the teacher spoke too low. Fortunately the textbook has a good chapter in this subject.»
- It would have been very interesting to have had a lab class. During the review sessions I think the teachers took a little bit to much place, speaking more than the students it would have been better to let us talk first and than add additional comments. i also think i could have been a little bit more clear how to answer the questions during the review (e.g. how long should the answers be). The reviews and the quiz could also be handed out after being graded so we can learn from our mistakes. the results from the quiz and review 2 were given the day before the exam, I think that was to late (we had no opportunity to learn from our mistakes from the quiz to the exam). »
- Not have so many lectures the week before the exam.»
- Nothing really»
- Tycker inte att redov. Från studiebesöken ska göras som de gjorde i år! Det blev så att två fick göra allt jobb vilket är fruktansvärt dåligt! Inga har mer tid än någonannan! Ett förslag vore att alla i gruppen redovisade eller att man besökte båda två! Dumt att man fick duggasvaret så sent! Jag skulle vilja veta det minst en vecka innan tentan så man kan lägga det bakom sig och veta vad som förväntas av en på tentan! Dåligt att det inte framgår vad som händer när man inte klarar ett obligatoriskt moment! Ska man göra om dog? När ? »

16. Additional comments

- I was expecting to learn more practical things, i.e. which material do you use for which type of implants. Have some exercices with concrete cases where you define which outcome you want to have. Also a lecture covering the present state in the field would be nice. The course is called biomaterials, but we study almost nothing about the materials, and that is missing for sure. I think that it is too focused on the biological part. Some introduction to the materials in medicine course, or a strong incentive to read it in the syllabus would be a nice guidance.»
- It would have been fun with a lab or two, but maybe that is not possible in this course?»
- nothing»
- I would like to have more exercices in the homework, including less fundamental details, just to improve my knowledges in biomaterials.»
- It was a really fun and interesting course. With great lecturers. Thank you all! »
- Great job Julie!!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.5
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.5
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.87

Kursutvärderingssystem från