ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Biochemical toxicology A, KBB100, sp1 2012

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-15 - 2012-11-04
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 48%
Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Bioteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

12 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 41%
Around 20 hours/week»4 33%
Around 25 hours/week»2 16%
Around 30 hours/week»1 8%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.91

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

12 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»6 50%
100%»6 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

12 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 25%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 30%
Yes, definitely»5 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 16%
Large extent»8 66%
Great extent»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»5 41%
Some extent»1 8%
Large extent»5 41%
Great extent»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

12 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»8 66%
Very well»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 16%
Rather good»2 16%
Very good»7 58%
I did not seek help»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

12 svarande

Very poorly»1 8%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 25%
Very well»7 58%
I did not seek cooperation»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

11. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 8%
Adequate»10 83%
High»1 8%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»8 66%
High»3 25%
Too high»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

12 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 8%
Adequate»2 16%
Good»5 41%
Excellent»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The laboratory exercise was very interesting and should certainly be kept.»
- The lab and the literature study. »
- The lab study»
- Mats Sandberg"s, Ulf Bredberg"s och Malin Celander"s lectures.»
- I liked that all the lecturers had different backgrounds/point of view.»
- more laboratory works.....»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Better handouts. Try to find a better connection between the lectures (as the course is today it is very spread not giving you a clear picture of what is important to know).»
- I felt sometimes that it had been more interesting to go deeper into some of the subjects, for example Ulf bredberg"s topic.»
- 4 hour lectures. Also the lab-study design was a bit pointless as we were not told to prepare for it, which obviously was expected of us.»
- There was a sense of a lack of a red thread through the course. Several speakers spoke of the same subjects while introducing the new ones. What could have helped is a summary or lecture goals before the lecture starts, where the student can fall back on and make it easier to distinguish what is of importance and what is not.»
- nothing»

16. Additional comments

- I talked to a person in the class telling me he sent an email to one of the lectures about a question on a lecture and got a replay that that was described in detail during the lecture. I think it isn"t very helpful of a lecturer giving such answer to a question a few days before the exam. Sometimes it is hard to follow and understand everything directly during the lectures, the questions often comes up when studying later. The lecturers should understand that and be able to answer questions after the lectures as well. »
- I really missed that the course didn"t involve immunotoxicology. »
- It will be better if there is biochemiical toxicology -2 course .»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75

Kursutvärderingssystem från