Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPEPO 1213-1 Power Engineering Design Project, EEK150

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-26 - 2012-11-08
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50%
Kontaktperson: Monika Råberg Hellsing»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Read this before filling in the questionnaire

Keep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 7%
Around 25 hours/week»3 23%
Around 30 hours/week»6 46%
At least 35 hours/week»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»13 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

12 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 16%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 83%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 75%
No, the goals are set too high»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

By examination we mean laborations, assignments etc., as well as written exams or larger projects.

13 svarande

No, not at all»1 7%
To some extent»2 15%
Yes, definitely»6 46%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»5 38%
Large extent»3 23%
Great extent»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»8 61%
Large extent»1 7%
Great extent»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»1 7%
Rather badly»2 15%
Rather well»5 38%
Very well»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

9. Comments about teaching and course administration

- Very Good.»
- At the first compulsory fackspråk-meeting there was a homework given out. This should be prepared before the next fackspråk-meeting. However it was never uploaded on the course homepage which I think would have been the right thing to do.»
- The technical writing should have been introducing in the first period of the masters program»
- Our project team was left merely without supervisor assistance in terms of teaching. Therefore, this course project is considered a "personal effort to teach oneself". Even though we were given a few lectures delivered by guest, these lectures contributed too little to knowledge compared to other courses. Some of the lectures and discussions were just a poor repetition of what we could read in the books.»
- I want to thank the teachers for a great work and for all their help!»

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 15%
Rather good»2 15%
Very good»9 69%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»8 61%
Very well»5 38%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

12. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»8 61%
Too high»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.38

13. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 46%
High»3 23%
Too high»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 15%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»6 46%
Excellent»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The interesring project topics.»
- More guidance needed, no point of banging of being stuck at some problems for weeks. This is not how the industry works»
- Aleksanders project»
- »
- It very good to get the practical experience and to try to solve the practical problems yourself. But we need a lot of help from teachers to solve the problem. I think this shows that there is a lack of practical knowledge in the overall studies. »

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More active supervision.»
- The projects should be able to be completed. »
- The prerequisites to the course MUST meet the tasks asked for in the project!! We had some tasks to work on but we never had courses to study such topics. The project scope could be smaller and thus the output would be more accurate. Some students had really hectic month in the project, they struggled to find the data asked for without success and after all got poor knowledge on the material. Real life projects are of much better educative quality. »

17. Additional comments

- The teacher Alexander did a very good job and made a lot of effort as he can and was so helpful and he arranged visits useful visits for us. and I would like to thank him a lot.»
- I probably failed my other course this period. I belive the main reason to this is that I didn"t get enough time to study, since the design project took way to much time. I don"t know what could be changed but perhaps one could look over the course structure and se if something could be removed. Moreover, I find it odd that some students were supposed to work with the environment Labview when there, as far as I know, is no one at Chalmers that really understand this program. This was a really frustrating issue which consumed a lot of unecesseary time. »
- Very good course that cultivates teamwork and encourages the students to take initiatives. »
- Some teachers had to many project to oversee. The maximum should be 1 tutor each project to be able to assist with keeping the project going.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från