Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPEPO 1213-1 Sustainable Power Production and Transportation, ENM095

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-26 - 2012-11-08
Antal svar: 38
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 59%
Kontaktperson: Monika Råberg Hellsing»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Read this before filling in the questionnaire

Keep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

38 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 18%
Around 20 hours/week»12 31%
Around 25 hours/week»14 36%
Around 30 hours/week»4 10%
At least 35 hours/week»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 2.47

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

38 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»4 10%
75%»17 44%
100%»17 44%

Genomsnitt: 4.34

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

37 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 2%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 2%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»16 43%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»19 51%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

36 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»3 8%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»28 77%
No, the goals are set too high»5 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.05

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

By examination we mean laborations, assignments etc., as well as written exams or larger projects.

36 svarande

No, not at all»2 5%
To some extent»12 33%
Yes, definitely»20 55%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

37 svarande

Not at all»1 2%
Small extent»2 5%
Some extent»10 27%
Large extent»20 54%
Great extent»4 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

7. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

37 svarande

Not at all»3 8%
Small extent»5 13%
Some extent»13 35%
Large extent»15 40%
Great extent»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 3.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

8. To what extent has the assignments been of help for your learning?

37 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 10%
Large extent»16 43%
Great extent»17 45%

Genomsnitt: 4.35

9. To what extent has the experimental laborations been of help for your learning?

37 svarande

Not at all»1 2%
Small extent»3 8%
Some extent»16 43%
Large extent»11 29%
Great extent»6 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.48

10. To what extent has the study visit been of help for your learning?

37 svarande

Not at all»3 8%
Small extent»2 5%
Some extent»20 54%
Large extent»9 24%
Great extent»3 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

11. To what extent has the course literature and other course material been of help for your learning?

37 svarande

Not at all»2 5%
Small extent»8 21%
Some extent»17 45%
Large extent»8 21%
Great extent»2 5%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc. work?

37 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»21 56%
Very well»16 43%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

13. Comments about teaching and course administration

- In addition, the scientific paper including the presentation was a very good opportunity to take a deeper look into a specific topic. I found this very interesting and it would have been nice to have access to the reports of the other students.»
- The lectures about solar, hydropower and wavepower are too poor of content, I expected more details about the technologies»
- the assignment 6 was very very diffivult and very big it took same time for all other 5 assignments plz reduce the assignment 6 next year...»
- Wind Turbine and Windlab, Sunlab and HEV Assignment were best parts of the lecture. The overview on other renewables energy sources and technologies was too superficial to make any gain out it. Maybe it would be better to focus on the strengths of this course (as mentioned above) to get more detailed information on these topics. Particular the HEV Topic is really interesting, but the information given in the lecture was too less. »
- The lectures was not good»
- Could be more interesting and dynamic»
- More literature for develop the assugments would be highly appreciated next time. There is ni compendium for solar for example while there are two for wind power. »
- The level of the education in this course is not befitting a Masters course! Most of the content taught during the lectures was covered in my previous education, in some cases, as early as in secondary school.»
- It should be more clear what is included in the exam. Some equations from the simulation tasks were surprising to find in the exam.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.16

Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

37 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»3 8%
Rather good»8 21%
Very good»23 62%
I did not seek help»3 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

36 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»7 19%
Very well»27 75%
I did not seek cooperation»2 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

16. How was the course workload?

37 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 8%
Adequate»27 72%
High»6 16%
Too high»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

17. How was the total workload this study period?

37 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»4 10%
Adequate»19 51%
High»10 27%
Too high»4 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

37 svarande

Poor»1 2%
Fair»3 8%
Adequate»10 27%
Good»18 48%
Excellent»5 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The assignments, especially the hybrid assignment»
- The assignments, the laboratory exercises, the study visit and the scientific paper. All these promote better understanding.»
- The good spirit and helpfulness of everyone involved»
- The detailed approach for the wind turbines part»
- broad knowledge, general overview of what is happening around the world»
- The assignments »
- The combination of lectures, assignments, laboratories and study visit. This was very nice.»
- All the guest lectures»
- the laborations and all the assignments except for the last one»
- More about fusion power and future battries maby a laborotorty of batries»
- Amount of problems solved in class and in the homepage.»
- Wind Turbine, Labs, HEV»
- The assignments are overall good. »
- THe first assignment»
- Assignments were useful.»
- The topics the course cover, the teacher from the assignment, and compendium of wind power.»
- The assignments»
- The vehicle labs, although the labs have to be reworked extensively. I did not feel that there was any clear connection between the different parts. A suggestion could be to let the students construct a simpler model, which is then altered as the exercises progress. This would allow the students to know exactly how the model works.»
- Study visit, assignments»
- Assignments, study visit»
- All the tasks.»
- assignments»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Some lectures, such as hydro power lecture, could go deeper and be more technical. For most people in the course, it was repetition.»
- There should be more occasions for the assignment work. On some days, it was not possible to talk to the supervisors more than one time.»
- The slides could me more detailed in order to help the student clarifying the important concepts The hybrid assignment was too long and complicated, especially because just before the exam»
- according to me, as non-electrical engineer, there were too pour details about primary energy conversion. More technical calculation about turbine design etc would have been interesting to me. »
- Less wind power and more of the other»
- Nothing »
- For the last assignment, the hybrid vehicle one, I think it would be good to get a third teaching assistant to be able to handle the questions and approval better.»
- Olas lectures»
- the assignment about hybrid vehicles which was quite extensive and not really that relevant for the examination. it could be shortened»
- What is expected from the scientific report should be clearer/clear. From teh oral presentation most of the students had understood the task equivalently but not all, this could have been avoided.»
- Complicated theoretical concepts need more time to be explained.»
- The last assignment needs a large overhaul since the current concept is not working at all. It"s too large for the time we are given and the number of teachers available. The number of tasks is rather large and the last one is very confusing since we only calculate lots and lots of numbers. There"s no good way to compare them all. Also the last task is badly designed since the hybrid car is only running on battery in the city cycle, thus making it a heavy electric vehicle. »
- The last assignment and the lectures»
- Some of the lectures could be more clear and more interesting.»
- The enphasis given to some topics which is not in equal way to others as well interested such as solar. The hybrid assufment too time cobsuming and hugh level.»
- Some things were unclear in the last assignment, even when we asked for help the answer was "I"m not really sure" at some questions.»
- In my view the course should not try to cover the entire field of energy conversion. Instead it should be limited to a smaller field, say, wind, solar, wave. And not, wind,solar,wave,hydro,nuclear fission, nuclear fusion a.s.o. On top of this you choose to incorporate how the transport sector should change. Thus my message is to concentrate on what your faculty is good at and leave the other topics to other courses!»
- The last assignment(hybrid) was too large and the possibility to get help from the assistants was rather poor. Moreover, feedback for the scienctific paper should be given before the exam so that the student know how many bonus points did he get.»
- HEV assignment, it was too complete for too short time»
- Put the hybrid tasks first in order, to give time to solve them. They are more difficult than the other tasks because Simulink is used.A short introduction to simulink could be useful.»

21. Additional comments

- Nice course. Rather broad and not very deep, but still manages to give a good idea on many topics.»
- Teachers made good performances, each had great knowledge in his/her field, very interesting. And the teachers during assignments made every effort to help us (even if we were too many students). I have enjoyed this class.»
- A very nice course, I learned a lot, and really enjoyed it!»
- The last assignment took much more time/week than the previous ones - I would have prefered that the work load would have bene more equal over the study period. If not considering the last assignment I found the work load to be low.»
- I took 150% courses so I have not done the exam yet»
- Further I would like to add that it would probably be beneficial for your course to collaborate with other courses/faculties to see what not to teach. In MPSES we have already covered most of the topics you taught and in more depth.»
- The course was overally perfect for me !»
- In the lectures, maybe give more technical details about how the systems (wind turbines, solar panels...) work»

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.16
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.54

Kursutvärderingssystem från