|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPEPO 1213-1 Power System Analysis, ENM050Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2012-10-26 - 2012-11-08 Antal svar: 52 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 65% Kontaktperson: Monika Råberg Hellsing» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Read this before filling in the questionnaireKeep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.50 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.74 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?51 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.43 Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?51 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.31 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.43 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.13 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?By examination we mean laborations, assignments etc., as well as written exams or larger projects.44 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.7 Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?51 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.49 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?51 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.49 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?51 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.45 9. Would you like to have the corresponding tutorial on the same day of (right after) the lecture, or at least one day after the lecture?49 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.38 10. Comments about teaching and course administration- I would like the tutorials at least one day after.»- (On Q9: Yes, at least one day after the lecture.)» - I think our teacher was one of the best teacher in whole my life, his teching, contact with students and also exam difficulties was great. Our tutor and Project responsible were also very helpful in learning process.» - great lecturer! » - Great lectures, looked forward to attend both lectures and tutorials. Tutorials can get a bit dry specially in the long problems» - The question number nine9 has meaningless answer!» - THERE IS NEED FOR THE TUTORIALS TO BE TAUGHT IN A BETTER WAY IN WHICH STUDENTS EASILY GRASP THE CONCEPTS AND THE EXPECTED OUTCOMES OF THE PROBLEMS BEING SOLVED. A STEP BY STEP APPROACH SHOULD BE ADOPTED SO THAT STUDENTS ARE ABLE TO FOLLOW WHAT THE TUTOR IS DOING AS WELL AS ENSURING THAT STUDENTS DON"T LOSE TRACK OF WHAT IS BEING SOLVED.» - Very good but to high of a work load.» - I think it took too much time before the tutorial solutions for every tutorial was uploaded. There was a lag of approx. one week.» - same day» - Question 9 isn"t a yes or no question. I answered yes for the former statement there. I would like to have the corresponding tutorial on the same day as the lecture. About the teaching, the teachers are great. Especially Peiyuan is a really good teacher. He has enthusiasm and is very easy to listen to and learn from. Keep him as teacher for next year!» - Question 9 : right after» - Very good teacher» - It will be better to have tutorial , atleast oneday after the lecture.» - Lecturer very good. Tutor not very good» - Our professor was extremely good! but the tutorial sessions need some changes, printed version with clear concepts.» - That would be wonderful!» - THe tutorial was not that good. Couldn"t see or hear what he said or wrote. when we had it right after the lecture the air in the room was totally unbreathable.» - Good lectures, didnt understand the tutourials» - Great lectures but not even nearly as good tutorials. Hard to follow and non-lerning hours.» - The course was well taught and the content was well delivered i learnt a whole lot» Study climate11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?51 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.92 12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?51 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.58 13. How was the course workload?51 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.56 14. How was the total workload this study period?51 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.72 Summarizing questions15. What is your general impression of the course?51 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.01 16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The teacher! He"s awesome»- Good lectures, interesting labs» - Great lectures!» - The teacher:).» - The book is not so good. I dont know if other books like grover and sarma is better but it take alot of time to try to understand what the book is talking about.» - Saidh he was a really good teacher and tutor.» - Laboratories» - THE WAY THE LECTURES ARE BEING CONDUCTED IS GOOD AND SHOULD BE PRESERVED» - The labs and the teacher.» - Peiyuan!» - Peiyuan was an excellent lecturer. One of the best ive ever had.» - The extra notes where a good summary of the topics. » - The teachers. The lectures were excellent. » - The very good lectures and derivations of equations» - Peijen !» - Peiyuan was a very good teacher » - everything» - Leturer» - the same course, but bit advanced!» - The lecturer» - Peiyan should be teacher. He is enthusiastic and very interactive. A pleasure to be his student» - slides, lectrues and tutorials where good» - Interesting and challenging to have all the lectures bu Peiyuan. He is so enthusiastic.» - Peiyan» - The tutorial was to complicated or to easy. The first one was to easy each week and the rest was to big or to complicated» - lectures» - The lab demonstrations and the tutorials after the lecture should be maintained» 17. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The project wasn"t a big help for understanding the course, it was mostly consuming time.»- Matlab instead of the powerworld project.» - I think it is better to use another software instead power world that can be used later in industry.» - Very good» - Tutorials could be better !» - Bigger room for the lectures, if the class next year is of the same size.» - TUTORIALS SHOULD BE TAUGHT IN A DIFFERENT WAY» - More ways to ontact someone about questions.» - I thought the exam was abit to big for the amount of time that was given. I would rather like to have some hand-ins during the course and then on the exam it could be more focus on what we learnd, instead of calculating a lot of geometry.» - not having the short circuit lab in study week 7» - I feel as though the solutions for the tutorials need to be shortened. Either that or maybe there should be other exercises in the tutorials. The exercises are very long and you do not learn in the best possible way by doing 5 exercises per week. You want some element of repetition when learning something new so that it sticks in your memory. The tutorials are very bad in that way. There should be more than one exercise on each subject in the course but there"s just not any time to have more unless you have shorter tasks.» - The tutorials. Very few questions that were way too hard. Would be better if there were lots of exercise questions that gradually increase in difficulty.» - The last lab shouldn"t be in week 7 And we had a lot of problems with power world Good program when it works but many hours were spent redoing things because the program crashed» - The program Power World was actually a dissapointment. The project was to big and took to much time and did not affect my learning to that extent that it could help me a lot with my exam or understanding for the course. The project should be smaller and maybe divide it with Matlab excersises so we as students could benefit more from calculations and to understand what we actually did in Power World.» - Turorial excercises, tutor. The Book! Not good at all» - The final exam was unfair...to much focus on things that was bearly talked about during the course and to little focus on the important things» - Try to educate the tutor, let him attend some lectures of Peiyuan or Jörgen B.» - Make sure that lectures and tutorials uses same symbols. Extremly stupid to use different. Very confusing for a struggling student. » - the teacher. Really good» - Tutorials should be easier to follow. Why didn"t we have questions conected to the book? Instead we had from last year compendium. » - Less focus should be placed on some of the topics that are not too applicable in the field especially in the exam it would be best to test students understanding» - » (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand) 18. Additional comments- Exam was pretty hard, I spent all the time calculating and had no time to read over my solutions.»- It wasn"t good to have the exams this period the days after each other.» - The course lecturer did a wonderful job. How the unversity determines this and do the promotion for all the other leturers to do the same job?» - Great ourse great teacher.» - I think the exam questions could be a bit clearer. Otherwise I think Peyuan is very pedagogical and committed in his teaching.» - I think the last lab is too late and the last chapters(5-6-7) are taught too fast compared to the first chapters (1-2-3). » - In tutorial, when we deal with problems related to newton raphson, fault calculation etc., lot of time has been spent on converting all to perunit, instead of its core solution.» - The philosophy of the tutorial exercises were different from the philosophy of the exams. Also attending them was like reading the solutions. They offered nothing more. The exam questions didn"t examined whether the student studied the course, especially the question with the L which was a geometry question more or less and the transformer question. Also the transformer question was confusing.» - After a few weeks the attendance dropped in the tutorials for lack of explanation/teaching. After the course feedback session the tutorials immediately got better» - I think the exam was alot harder than the teacher hinted it would be.» - It"s very important that Chalmers educate the lecturers. Although a lot of knolledge there are obvius lack in pedagogic skills. Isn"t there any program to helping lecturers and tutors to be excellent in their teaching.» - The tutorial solutions are poorly written and leave out crusual steps. » - Think I understand the course really good but the exam was really hard. Some evil stuff in every question.» - The exam seemed harder than previous exams» - Exams were not asking questions about the fundamenatal parts of the course. Every question had a new "twist" that made the exam TO HARD!! Of course an exam should have some twists on some of the questions, but not on ALL of them!! Many student that were well prepered did not even have time to finish all questions on the exam! That is not right! » - In general i would say the course was ok.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12%