ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

LP1 HT12 ARK316 Leadership 1

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-04 - 2012-10-28
Antal svar: 22
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 52%
Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Arkitektur 300 hp

1. One question about the course in general*

Estimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of this statement, where
1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement
5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement

Matrisfråga

The general impression is that the course was very good*
22 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 4%
3»1 4%
4»7 31%
5»13 59%
I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 4.45 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. Five questions about the course

Estimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of these statements, where
1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement
5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement

Matrisfråga

- The time was not enough for the tasks.»
- -»
- Excellent course! the only problem as I see it is that we should have this course earlier in the education. Or preferrably once a year. »
- The course could be much more related to leadership in the architectural profession. »
- the final grades did not correspond to the demands given to us before. If you do not hand in on time, it should be impossible to have a 5, otherwise why have deadlines?? »

It was clear to me what the learning outcomes of the course were
22 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 14%
4»11 52%
5»7 33%
I dont know»1

Genomsnitt: 4.19

The examination and the aims of the course were well related
22 svarande

1»2 9%
2»0 0%
3»4 18%
4»8 36%
5»8 36%
I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 3.9

The course was very well administered
22 svarande

1»0 0%
2»4 18%
3»5 22%
4»5 22%
5»8 36%
I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 3.77

I felt that the course had a high degree of significance for my education
22 svarande

1»1 4%
2»0 0%
3»2 9%
4»4 18%
5»15 68%
I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 4.45

The course demanded a high degree of work effort
22 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»4 18%
4»8 36%
5»10 45%
I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 4.27

3. What elements of the course should definitely remain?

- The students presentations of there MT»
- lectures, group working, feed back, and presentations»
- Everything»
- The group work»
- The group constallations»
- The structure. The positive spirit. Focus on collaboration. The encouragement.»
- Small group work»
- groupwpro and the making of a project plan.»
- group excercises, iterations of idea developement»
- Writing a planning report»
- working during school time. great to have a 9 - 16 schedule. no late nights and busy weekends is great»
- The group assignments and that we had time to develop a clear idea for the master thesis. »
- the feedback, but preferably in smaller groups»
- It had many good assignments within groupwork and presentationtecniqeus that were good and should remain.»

4. Were there any elements missing in the course?

- No»
- -»
- No»
- No literature, for a student learning primarly by reading, the course was very challenging due to lack of different ways to learn. Not everyone can learn by lectures alone.»
- Time for reflection. »
- Inspiring guest lectures»
- How project leading can be in the architectural professon.»
- no»
- would be great to have a summery of the course material given from the teachers. just to be able to apply it when the course is over.»
- -»
- there are other kinds of leadership than the very "out-going, liking to talk, american-style". That could be put through much more.»

5. What, if anything, do you think should be changed in the course?

- More time and I think the interview was not so relevent... And I feelt that the boys in the course got mutch more attention many student feelt the same, and I had heard that for earlyer student that the tetchers favored boys....»
- better class room. the room was terrible, no air circulation, uncomfortable interior layout of the class.»
- Lokalen-dålig luft, dåliga stolar. »
- Add literature, make it possible for students to learn by reading, not only listening and doing. Give more time for final assignments.»
- To have specific time for feedback on the text. »
- The course was stressful, give more time to reflect about idea development.»
- a bit more practical info about the MT»
- The interview could be handed in earlier, not in the middle of the first draft. Some more time to reflect would have been good. Maybe even one more draft. »
- The grading system. The course should only have the grades pass or no pass. Since the course has very much to do with ones personal development it felt strange to get a grade on that. »
- i think the teachers should be less focused on the male part of the class. They are normally fewer, which means they are easier to remember, but they are given an unpropotrionally big part of the attention in class. i also wonder if there is a grading difference between maja and marie... It seems like maja is more generous with the grades, or? no more public presentations where everybody in the class has to stand up and tell their opinion. it is more painful than awarding for most people.»
- It could be fewer and more condensed lectures »

6. Which parts/elements of the course were the most important for your learning outcome?

If there is anything missing in the list below, please let us know! (Comments)

Matrisfråga

- -»
- Doing an interview about leadership.»
- Course literature»
- Students were not equally treated!»
- Would have been good to get more direct feedback on the written drafts as well. Too much focus on just the oral presentations.»
- Great and very helpful course! should be given to the students in the bachelor program as well. inspirational and encouraging. »
- The leadership course if overall a very good and relevant course that gives students the possibility to prepare for the master thesis as well as time to reflect on the education and ones strenghts and weeknesses and how to work with them. If something, this course should be held earlier in the education since we havn"t had ANY exercises or information on how to work well in a group or presentation techniques. »

Lectures
21 svarande

-»0 0%
OK»6 28%
+»7 33%
++»8 38%
Not relevant / I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 3.09

Exercises
21 svarande

-»0 0%
OK»3 14%
+»6 28%
++»12 57%
Not relevant / I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 3.42

Workshops
21 svarande

-»0 0%
OK»5 26%
+»6 31%
++»8 42%
Not relevant / I dont know»2

Genomsnitt: 3.15

Project work
21 svarande

-»1 6%
OK»2 12%
+»4 25%
++»9 56%
Not relevant / I dont know»5

Genomsnitt: 3.31

Ask questions
21 svarande

-»0 0%
OK»7 33%
+»8 38%
++»6 28%
Not relevant / I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 2.95

Hand -ins
21 svarande

-»2 9%
OK»3 14%
+»9 42%
++»7 33%
Not relevant / I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 3

Examination
21 svarande

-»1 5%
OK»6 30%
+»12 60%
++»1 5%
Not relevant / I dont know»1

Genomsnitt: 2.65

Team work
21 svarande

-»0 0%
OK»1 4%
+»5 23%
++»15 71%
Not relevant / I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 3.66

Independent work
21 svarande

-»0 0%
OK»3 14%
+»10 47%
++»8 38%
Not relevant / I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 3.23

Occasions with critique (feedback)
21 svarande

-»1 4%
OK»1 4%
+»5 23%
++»14 66%
Not relevant / I dont know»0

Genomsnitt: 3.52

Guest lectures
21 svarande

-»0 0%
OK»4 23%
+»8 47%
++»5 29%
Not relevant / I dont know»4

Genomsnitt: 3.05

External study visits
21 svarande

-»2 40%
OK»1 20%
+»2 40%
++»0 0%
Not relevant / I dont know»16

Genomsnitt: 2

Other element
19 svarande

-»0 0%
OK»1 33%
+»1 33%
++»1 33%
Not relevant / I dont know»16

Genomsnitt: 3

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.45

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.45
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.86

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från