ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

ADU TEST

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-09-18 - 2012-09-19
Antal svar: 0
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 0%
Kontaktperson: Saddek Rehal»

Competence

How would you rate in a scale of 1 to 5 the experiences you acquired through the workshop you took part of? (1=very bad, 5=very well).

1. Awareness of the social function of Architecture and of how the architect can contribute ideas to the society to improve habitats.

Please rate

0 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 0

2. Skill in designing building and/or urban development projects that blend with the surrounding environment and fully satisfy local human, social and cultural requirements.

Please rate

0 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 0

3. Skill in formulating ideas and transforming them into architectural creations exemplifying the principles of composition, and good visual perception and spatial perception.

Please rate

0 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 0

4. Knowledge, sensitivity and commitment regarding current architectural issues at local and global levels.

Please rate

0 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 0

5. Capacity to undertake architectural and urban development projects guaranteeing sustainable development and environmental, social, cultural and economic maintainability.

Please rate

0 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 0

6. Capacity to design buildings and structures that will respond well to the bioclimatic, landscape and topographical conditions of the region in question.

Please rate

0 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 0

7. Capacity to define the appropriate construction systems and technology for the architectural project and local context in question.

Please rate

0 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 0

Professional areas

8. Did you feel that new professional areas (or aspects of them) were envisaged through the workshop? Please justify your answer.

Design Thinking and Transdisciplinary Thinking

9. Did you feel that the work done in the Workshop involved transdiciplinarity? And if so, how do you feel about it?

Please explain!

10. Did you feel that the workshop involved Design Thinking and that have promote your creativity? Can you explain how do you feel about it?

Here is a brief explanation of the concept ‘,,,,design thinking’,,,,.

Please explain!

11. Did the teaching methods involve a special hierarchical learning model? (eg. Top-down, or non-hierarchical). And if so, how do you feel about it?

Please explain!

12. Did the workshop involve ‘,hot topics’, in ADU? And if not, what do you think are hot topics in ADU? Please explain.

Please explain!

13. Was the workshop based on social and cultural references, provided by site choice, program and theme? Did the international dimension of the ADU project participants affect the workshop?

Please explain!

14. How were the material and abstract aspects of the workshop made compatible? How do you feel about this? Please explain.

Please explain!

15. What do you think the professional challenges will be for your generation?

Please explain!

16. What do you think are important regional focus points at continent, area or country level in a global world?

Please explain!

Your experience

And now we need to have a brief evaluation of your experience and suggestions for the next ADU Workshops.

17. Were the objectives of the Workshop well presented?

Please grade!

0 svarande

very badly presented»0 0%
badly presented»0 0%
neither badly nor well presented»0 0%
well presented»0 0%
very well presented»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 0

18. Were the objectives of the Workshop adequate, or too low (easy), or too high (difficult)?

Please grade!

0 svarande

too low»0 0%
low»0 0%
neither low nor high»0 0%
adequate»0 0%
very much adequate»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 0

19. Did you get a good support and guidance from the teaching team?

Please grade!

0 svarande

very bad support»0 0%
bad support»0 0%
neither bad nor god support»0 0%
good support»0 0%
very good support»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 0

20. Did you learn something you did not know before? Refer to what you learned from other students, from the theme, the method, the teachers or other source of learning.

Please grade!

0 svarande

very little»0 0%
litle»0 0%
enough»0 0%
much»0 0%
very much»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 0

21. Which of the following type of learning you think characterize the workshop?

You can choose more than one alternative

0 svarande

Learning through teaching (following the teacher advises)»0 0%
learning through proposal making. (working with the project)»0 0%
learning through participation. (working with other people)»0 0%
learning through interdisciplinary dialogue»0 0%
learning through criticism, (feedback from techers + other)»0 0%
learning through reflection. (thinking over what you do)»0 0%
learning through research (making deeper investigations),»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 0

22. Do you think that the conferences were intresting?

0 svarande

not at all»0 0%
no»0 0%
Neither no nor yes»0 0%
yes»0 0%
yes very much»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 0

23. Do you think that such a workshop can stimulate your creativity?

Please grade!

0 svarande

very little»0 0%
little»0 0%
enough»0 0%
much»0 0%
very much»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 0

24. What is your general opinion of the workshop. Please comment on the positive and negative aspects.

Please comment!

Kursutvärderingssystem från