ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

BOM Geotechnics, BOM045

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-06-08 - 2012-06-25
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 15%
Kontaktperson: Ingela Gustafson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp

Learning outcomes and examination

Before you answer these questions, please check in the course syllabus what is stated about learning outcomes of the course.

1. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»3 21%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 71%
No, the goals are set too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

2. To what extent have you reached the learning outcomes?

14 svarande

0-20%»4 28%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»2 14%
60-80%»8 57%
80-100%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- All. I dont see why there is 25% time ecturing and 75% exercises. » (40-60%)
- Pore pressure» (60-80%)

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

Please consider all kinds of examiantions during the course: assignments, projects, seminars, final written exam, etc.

15 svarande

No, not at all»2 13%
To some extent»6 40%
Yes, definitely»4 26%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

- Really strange that if you achieve a 5 on the exam you still can"t get a 5 without doing an oral exam in fall. What about exchange students going home etc?» (To some extent)

Teaching and learning

4. To what extent has the organised teaching activities been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»10 66%
Some extent»5 33%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

- Quite good tecing on exercises from both Jorge and Claes. Lectures are a catastrophe. Claes speaks so low that if you sit further back than row 4 you don"t hear anything. Unclear sketches and so on. If you missed a lecture you hade no clue what you"d missed and how to catch up.» (Small extent)
- the teatcher was talking so very quietly so you could not hear him which lead to that you ended up not going to the lectures. » (Small extent)

5. To what extent has the teaching material and the course home page been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»3 20%
Some extent»7 46%
Large extent»4 26%
Great extent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- Why is there no real course literature? The compendium is just a mix of different texts, articles and powerpointpresentations. There is no context. All equations refer to BKR not to Eurodcode, the preface said there was no time to change but the change to Eurodcode can not have come as a surprise? (Structural engineering has used Eurocode since we started Chalmers in 2008...) » (Some extent)
- It was really hard to learn the teory!!» (Some extent)
- would be nicer if the pamflet was made in to a booklet. » (Some extent)

6. How were the opportunities to get feedback and for asking questions and getting help from teachers and supervisors?

12 svarande

Very poor»2 16%
Rather poor»1 8%
Rather good»6 50%
Very good»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- Had to send two e-mails before getting any answere.» (Very poor)
- Loads of time to ask questions on exercises.» (Rather good)

Course organisation

7. How well did the course organisation, course information, course home page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»1 7%
Rather badly»5 35%
Rather well»8 57%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

Study climate

8. To what extent have the facilties at Chalmers been appropriate to support your studies in this course, e.g. lecture halls, study rooms, equipment, computer labs etc.

14 svarande

Small extent»3 21%
Some extent»3 21%
Large extent»8 57%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.35

9. How much of your available time for studies in this study period did you spend on this course?

It is assumed that 50% of the time in one quarter is used for a course of 7,5 credit units.

14 svarande

less than 20%»9 64%
20-40%»2 14%
about 50%»3 21%
60-80%»0 0%
more than 80%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.57

- I took "strukturmekanik" simultaneously, and since that was a very demanding course with several examination tasks I spent most of the time on that course, unfortunately.» (20-40%)

10. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»2 14%
Low»7 50%
Adequate»3 21%
High»0 0%
Too high»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

Summarising questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»8 53%
Fair»2 13%
Adequate»3 20%
Good»2 13%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

- Poor course. No ambition.» (Fair)
- I think that a better structure during the lectures would promote the learning. It is sometimes hard to follow what is written on the black board. The notes are hard to follow when you look back at older lectures.» (Adequate)

12. What is the remaining value of the course in the future

15 svarande

Very small»4 26%
Rather small»3 20%
Neutral»3 20%
Rahter high»4 26%
Very high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- Could be a good course, but with nothing to do most of the course and only a test it is seen as a reather lazy class which means that tou don"t study it until the very last week. » (Neutral)
- Since I hope to work within the subject I believe the course will be very useful in the future. I think the content is very relevant. One of the more interesting courses this far in the master programme.» (Very high)

13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Övningstillfällen där exempel gås i genom av övningsledare varje gång.»
- Actually I don"t know.»
- The material in the compendium seemed very relevant, and should definitely be kept. The solved examples on pingpong was also very useful during studies. »
- It would be better if student can hear the teacher voice in lecture»
- -»

14. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Claes Ahlén, det går inte att höra vad han säger under föresläsningarna. Han är väldigt ostrukturerad när han skriver på tavlan och han känns väldigt oförberedd och ointresserad. Även om han är duktig och kunnig inom sitt ämne så fångar han inte studenterna på det viset.»
- This course is very important for those who are more focused on geotechnics than drinking/waste water. I would therefore like to see some kind of assignments that students would need to carry out to get further understanding on the subject. Having only one final exam which accounts for 100% of the grade and NO assignments to hand in what so ever, is just not to par witch the other courses or the expectations I have for this masters program. And why are no lecture slides on ping pong?»
- You need to be able to hear the person lecturing otherwise it"s no point of going there. I went for three lectures and after that, never again. Would be nice with a real book as well. The compendium was not especially tempting to read.»
- Lectures need to improve!!!! Claes needs to speak up and have a structure in the teaching. Proper course literature would be appreciated. Eurocode must be introduced. This is a masters course were we are supposed to learn both theory and how to calculate. Overall, I had the feeling that Claes don"t put any time or effort in teaching and he does not listen to the students. I"m really disappointed at this course, it does not reach the level I expect of Chalmers masters course. »
- The team of teachers! No one feels responsible for this course and therefore the motivation is very low to get into this subject!»
- More lab testning and group work to get the student started with the course earlier»
- Better structured notes. The compendium would also be easier to follow with a proper numbering of the pages.»
- * The course literature * The lectures * The exam * The solutions for the exercises»
- the teacher, the "Book"»
- the lector and lecture were a disaster. worst course i have ever attended.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från