Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

BOM Structural concrete, VBB072

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-06-08 - 2012-06-25
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 20%
Kontaktperson: Ingela Gustafson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp

Learning outcomes and examination

Before you answer these questions, please check in the course syllabus what is stated about learning outcomes of the course.

1. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 92%
No, the goals are set too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

- To me it feels like we are doing too many things it too general level. I mean - I would prefer to focus more on some parts and take it more deeply than doing all parts but not thoroughly enough. But as clear overview of these three topisc, it was perfect.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

2. To what extent have you reached the learning outcomes?

14 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»2 14%
60-80%»8 57%
80-100%»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.14

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

Please consider all kinds of examiantions during the course: assignments, projects, seminars, final written exam, etc.

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 35%
Yes, definitely»9 64%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

- To many tasks so did not have time to calculate all of them. Reduce the number of task or make them smaller. » (To some extent)
- Think there could have been a really basic task. I know a lot of people felt all tasks, even the first two, had a little twist.» (Yes, definitely)
- the FEM project» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and learning

4. To what extent has the organised teaching activities been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 21%
Large extent»3 21%
Great extent»8 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- solving examples on lectures was great. but sometimes 4 hours of examples were quite exhausting :-D » (Large extent)
- Björn is a really good lecturer. Great to mix theory and practicing tasks. Only problem i there is a bit too many tasks, it covered everything but was sometimes har to keep up after many hours. The project teaching could be improved, a ot of focus was put on technicalities were I would have needed understanding the concept more. » (Great extent)
- The lectures were really great!!» (Great extent)

5. To what extent has the teaching material and the course home page been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»1 7%
Large extent»8 57%
Great extent»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- I almost did not use the compendia. It wasn"t needed (only 2 or 3 formulas for long term effects on the exam) and I regret buying it.» (Small extent)
- good books» (Large extent)
- Great course books. Really helpful.» (Great extent)

6. How were the opportunities to get feedback and for asking questions and getting help from teachers and supervisors?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 7%
Rather good»10 71%
Very good»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- More consultation time for the project» (Rather good)
- Really good from Björn. Always very helpful. A bit hard to get answes from Mario and Hamid, took them long to answer e-mails and it was to crowded on project sessions. » (Very good)

Course organisation

7. How well did the course organisation, course information, course home page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 35%
Very well»9 64%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

- good with that Björn distributed the examples on paper. Easy to follow. Could be good though the make some sort of booklet of all the examples. » (Very well)

Study climate

8. To what extent have the facilties at Chalmers been appropriate to support your studies in this course, e.g. lecture halls, study rooms, equipment, computer labs etc.

14 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»8 57%
Large extent»4 28%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.35

- More computers are needed to the project and maybee two booked computer halls for the project time» (Some extent)
- As always, it"s hard to find computers in the V-building and since we needed Abaqus to do the project we had to use the computers there. Next year,book two rooms for the project session instead of one!!!» (Some extent)
- The computer rooms are too small for the big group of students.» (Some extent)
- There was to few computer rooms available at the computer labs.» (Some extent)
- not been able to find a computer for the FEM project a lot of times» (Some extent)

9. How much of your available time for studies in this study period did you spend on this course?

It is assumed that 50% of the time in one quarter is used for a course of 7,5 credit units.

14 svarande

less than 20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
about 50%»3 21%
60-80%»5 35%
more than 80%»6 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.21

- since the project was quite big and also interesting. And the other course was Geotechnics, which was super boring and did not have any homeworks or projects» (60-80%)

10. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 21%
High»7 50%
Too high»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- quite high since there was both the dugga and the project during the course. » (High)
- I did not have the time to work on examples by my self. Project work and dugga took to much time and there was little space in my schedule to find sufficient time to work on my own. My other course hade a very similar schedule and deadlines with projects and dugga as well. » (Too high)

Summarising questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 14%
Good»5 35%
Excellent»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.35

12. What is the remaining value of the course in the future

14 svarande

Very small»0 0%
Rather small»0 0%
Neutral»2 14%
Rahter high»6 42%
Very high»6 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

- I will probably use the strip as well as the strut and tie methods in order to understand and discuss structures in the future. The pre-stressed part was hard to get the grip of since it mostly consist of rules and numbers that you need to check up in a book. Not as neat as the first two parts. The FE-project was to some extent good, however a lot of time had to be spent on Abaqus problems rather than the actually design problem. I have used a few other programs to perform FE-analysis that is more easy to use and well adapted to structural engineering, e.g. Ansys and Oasys GSA.» (Rahter high)

13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Björns teaching»
- Björn ia a great lecturer and the project was really good to gain understanding.»
- Lectures FE-Project»
- calculating examples with help of handouts»
- The lectures »

14. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Smaller exam so there is time for thinking. Now there was no time for that. I only had time to complete 3 out of 5 tasks »
- no more 4 (or sometimes 8) hours of exercises in row :-D I would appresiate to have more real life examples, pictures, structures, movies from testing etc.»
- Project guidelines could be clearer, what is expect in the report etc. »
- Nothkng that I can think of»
- The computer labs»
- The FEM Project. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från