Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

FFR125 (Part II), FFR125

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-06-04 - 2012-06-11
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 45%
Kontaktperson: Mattias Wahde»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

1. How do you rate the teaching and supervision during the fourth quarter?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»2 18%
Average»3 27%
Good»5 45%
Very good»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.45 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Sometimes extremely long time until emails were answered.» (Poor)
- It is in this part to say anything, because no one taught anything in the part of the course and student themselves learned everything. Teachers were just watching.» (Poor)

2. To what extent have the robotics assignments been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»10 90%
Very large extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.81 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Most of the time were spent trying to work around the limitations of Basic STAMP or trying to identify faulty hardware.» (Small extent)
- It"s good because you encounter a lot of practical problems that you never see in matlab» (Large extent)

3. How do you rate the level of difficulty of the robotics assignments?

11 svarande

Very easy»0 0%
Rather easy»3 27%
Rather difficult»8 72%
Very difficult»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.72 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Due to the same reasons stated above.» (Rather difficult)
- more challanging than difficult.» (Rather difficult)

4. How do you rate the robotics equipment used in the course?

Boe-bot + sensors

11 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
bad»4 36%
average»5 45%
good»2 18%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- Sensors and robotic mechanics were ok, the use of the BS2 controller not so good. Allthough it is good to learn to work under hardware constraints, maybe the ones imposed by the choice of chip was a bit to hard.» (bad)
- not enought materials to build the robot .» (average)
- A better processor would had been interesting.» (average)

5. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 63%
High»3 27%
Too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- thusday mornings are really not enought » (High)
- More detailed information should have been given beforehand that 50% of the course load is in another quarter. Meaning that you first study at 75% and then 125% since all the credits are given in the last quarter.» (Too high)

6. What is your overall impression of this course?

For this question, please evaluate the entire course, i.e. both the theory part (third quarter) and the practical part (fourth quarter).

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Average»1 9%
Good»5 45%
Very good»5 45%

Genomsnitt: 4.36 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It could be much better if the teachers had spent two or three lectures to teach the basic and primary things about the robot like: 1. One lecture to assemble the robot and show different configurations and how the robot can be adjusted to do different jobs. Describing and introducing some different spare parts that can be used by this robot. 2. PBasic programming language Actually we spent most of the time to learn and understand some basic things about Boe-bot while teachers could do that for us. The ET-Lab were not always open to use its equipment and it made the work hard to do, I mean students did not have access to ET-Lab. Plus, the equipments in the ET-Lab were not enough (or we did not have access to all equipments) to do the assignments. So, it is necessary to introduce students to some workshops in Mechanical Engineering building to use some facilities there like drills, screws and etc.» (Good)
- Really fun!» (Very good)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.34

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.34
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.65

Kursutvärderingssystem från