Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Environmental aspects on transport and logistics, ITR361
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-05-29 - 2012-06-07 Antal svar: 8 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 66% Kontaktperson: Maria Lindholm» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.8 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 1 | | 12% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 4 | | 50% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 1 | | 12% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 2 | | 25% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 2. If you compare the course with other courses you have attended, how labour-intensive was the course?8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 2 | | 25% |
the same» | | 4 | | 50% |
much» | | 2 | | 25% |
very much» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - The effort spent in this course was very optional.» (little)
- Probably this is not true. I just put "little" because since it has home examination reports it gives flexibility to the students to organise better themselves, which is good/perfect.» (little)
3. If you compare the course with other courses you have attended, how difficult was the course?8 svarande
very easy» | | 0 | | 0% |
easy» | | 4 | | 50% |
the same» | | 3 | | 37% |
difficult» | | 1 | | 12% |
very difficult» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.62 - The effort spent in this course was very optional.» (the same)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.4. How understandable are the course goals?8 svarande
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 8 | | 100% |
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.8 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 8 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 6. Did the examination (home examination reports and case study) assess whether you have reached the goals?8 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 4 | | 50% |
Yes, definitely» | | 4 | | 50% |
I don» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - This structure should be kept: it is a good assessment strategy in my point of view.» (Yes, definitely)
Course administrationThis section deals with the course administration. 7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 6 | | 75% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?8 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 50% |
Very well» | | 4 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Some misunderstandings regarding deadlines. I would really like it if the slides were available before the lecture so it would be possible to take notes on them.» (Rather well)
- The hand outs of home assignments were late.» (Rather well)
9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?8 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 8 | | 100% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4 - Very good support and feedback from the lecturers.» (Very good)
LecturesThis section deals with the lectures we have had in the course. The goal is to assess the relevance of each lecture as well as the performance of the lecturer.10. Are the topics of the lectures relevant for the course?*The course addressed a lot of different topics. Below you find the list of the lectures which we have had in the course covering the different topics. What topics should be definitely be included in the course? And what topics should not be part of the course? If you did do not have an opinion or do not remember , please choose "no opinion/I do not remember"Matrisfråga - Something more about shipping industry»
- No»
Environmental logistics (MB)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 2 | | 25% |
highly relevant» | | 6 | | 75% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 0 | | |
Life cycle assessment (MB)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
highly relevant» | | 8 | | 100% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 0 | | |
Case Study - LCA of transport chains (ML)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
highly relevant» | | 7 | | 87% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 1 | | |
Environmental impacts from the transport sector (MB)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 1 | | 12% |
highly relevant» | | 7 | | 87% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 0 | | |
A unifying framework for sustainable development (JO)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 4 | | 50% |
highly relevant» | | 4 | | 50% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 0 | | |
Sustainable aspect on intermodality (SB)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 2 | | 25% |
highly relevant» | | 5 | | 62% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 1 | | |
Alternative fuels - production and emissions (MB)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 1 | | 12% |
highly relevant» | | 7 | | 87% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 0 | | |
City logistics (JW)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
highly relevant» | | 7 | | 87% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 1 | | |
City logistics (ML)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
highly relevant» | | 7 | | 87% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 1 | | |
Reverse Logistics (II)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 2 | | 25% |
highly relevant» | | 3 | | 37% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 3 | | |
Policy measures in the freight transport sector (PS)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 1 | | 12% |
relevant» | | 3 | | 37% |
highly relevant» | | 4 | | 50% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 0 | | |
External costs in the transport sector (PS)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 2 | | 25% |
highly relevant» | | 6 | | 75% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 0 | | |
Environmental strategies from a freight forwarder’,,,,s perspective (UH)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 4 | | 50% |
highly relevant» | | 1 | | 12% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 3 | | |
Environmental logistics, part II (POA)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 3 | | 37% |
highly relevant» | | 4 | | 50% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 1 | | |
Power rationality and decision making in transport infrastructure investments (GF)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 1 | | 12% |
highly relevant» | | 4 | | 50% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 3 | | |
Logistics management and the environment I+II (MHB)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 2 | | 25% |
highly relevant» | | 6 | | 75% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 0 | | |
Env. consideration when purchasing transport services (MBj)* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 3 | | 37% |
highly relevant» | | 2 | | 25% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 3 | | |
Environmental strategies from a truck manufacturer* 8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
relevant» | | 1 | | 12% |
highly relevant» | | 1 | | 12% |
No opinion/I do not remember» | | 6 | | |
11. How was the lecturer*Please judge the quality of the lecture. Do you think that the lecturer has a good knowledge of the topic? Was he motivated, interested and committed? If you did not attend or do not remember any lecture, please choose "I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember".Matrisfråga MB - Environmental logistics...* 8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 14% |
much» | | 1 | | 14% |
very much» | | 5 | | 71% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.57 ML - Case study intro...* 8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 2 | | 25% |
much» | | 1 | | 12% |
very much» | | 5 | | 62% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.37 MB - Environmental impacts...* 8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 14% |
much» | | 2 | | 28% |
very much» | | 4 | | 57% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.42 JO - A unifying framework...* 8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 2 | | 28% |
much» | | 2 | | 28% |
very much» | | 3 | | 42% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.14 SB - Sustainability aspects on intermodality...* 8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 14% |
much» | | 3 | | 42% |
very much» | | 3 | | 42% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.28 MB - Alternative fuels...* 8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
much» | | 2 | | 25% |
very much» | | 6 | | 75% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.75 JW - City logistics...* 8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 14% |
much» | | 2 | | 28% |
very much» | | 4 | | 57% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.42 ML - City logistics...* 8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 14% |
much» | | 2 | | 28% |
very much» | | 4 | | 57% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.42 II - Reverse logistics...* 8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 1 | | 20% |
neutral» | | 2 | | 40% |
much» | | 0 | | 0% |
very much» | | 2 | | 40% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 3 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.6 PS - Policy measures...* 8 svarande
very little» | | 1 | | 12% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 12% |
much» | | 0 | | 0% |
very much» | | 6 | | 75% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.25 EF - External costs...* 8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 1 | | 14% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 14% |
much» | | 2 | | 28% |
very much» | | 3 | | 42% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4 UH - Environmental strategies...* 8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 2 | | 40% |
much» | | 0 | | 0% |
very much» | | 3 | | 60% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 3 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.2 POA - Environmental logistics part II* 8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 16% |
much» | | 0 | | 0% |
very much» | | 5 | | 83% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.66 GF -Power rationality...* 8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
much» | | 0 | | 0% |
very much» | | 3 | | 100% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 5 | | |
Genomsnitt: 5 MHB - Logistics management...* 8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 14% |
much» | | 1 | | 14% |
very much» | | 5 | | 71% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.57 MBj - Env. considerations...* 8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 20% |
much» | | 1 | | 20% |
very much» | | 3 | | 60% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 3 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.4 EH - Environmental strategies...* 8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
much» | | 0 | | 0% |
very much» | | 2 | | 100% |
I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember» | | 6 | | |
Genomsnitt: 5 12. On which topic (related to the course content) would you have wished to get a guest lecture by an external expert?- I think the guest lectures were well planned and cover almost al the relevant topics»
- -»
- I cannot think of any part missing»
- Probably reverse logistics. A company such IKEA that strives a lot to obtain high quality processes in this area.»
13. How many of the offered lectures did you attend?8 svarande
0 - 25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25-50%» | | 1 | | 12% |
50-75%» | | 2 | | 25% |
75-100%» | | 5 | | 62% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 14. What were the reasons for not attending a lecture?7 svarande
The lecture was not interesting to me» | | 0 | | 0% |
There was a time conflict with other courses» | | 6 | | 85% |
other reason» | | 1 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 2.14 - Work» (other reason)
Examination reportsThis section deals with the examination reports. First, questions on the examination reports in general are stated, followed by questions for each examination report.15. In comparison to an exam at the end of the course, how well are the examination reports in general for achieving the course objectives?8 svarande
very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
rather good» | | 5 | | 62% |
very good» | | 3 | | 37% |
Genomsnitt: 4.37 - The topics are very general inside a specific subject, which was really good because the students could write a lot about different issues. If we had a final exam, the questions would be more specific and there would not be the possibility for getting this overview of the envrionmental aspects under different perspectives as we get with examniation report: different authors, sources and papers.» (rather good)
16. Was it beneficial for your learning that you needed to work together with different partners?*8 svarande
not at all - better to work alone or with the same partner» | | 2 | | 25% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 12% |
yes - working with different partners increased my learning» | | 5 | | 62% |
Genomsnitt: 2.37 17. How was the workload for the examination reports in general?8 svarande
by far too little» | | 0 | | 0% |
too little» | | 0 | | 0% |
okay» | | 6 | | 75% |
too much» | | 2 | | 25% |
by far too much» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 - With too much i mean quite high, but still ok.» (too much)
18. How well did the administration, e.g. handouts, handins, etc work?8 svarande
very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 2 | | 25% |
rather good» | | 2 | | 25% |
very good» | | 4 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.25 - Delayed sometimes but compensated by prolinging hand-in time» (very good)
19. Examination report 1Matrisfråga- It was probably the hardest of the three examination reports.»
- Bad feedback. No feedback whatsoever..»
How relevant was the examination report for achieving the goals? 7 svarande
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 14% |
much» | | 6 | | 85% |
Genomsnitt: 2.85 How was the workload compared to the relevance (maximum points given) of the examination report? 7 svarande
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 5 | | 71% |
much» | | 2 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 2.28 How difficult was the examination report? 7 svarande
little» | | 1 | | 14% |
neutral» | | 4 | | 57% |
much» | | 2 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 2.14 20. Examination report 2Matrisfråga- Good articles, great feedback.»
How relevant was the examination report for achieving the goals? 7 svarande
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
much» | | 7 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 3 How was the workload compared to the relevance (maximum points given) of the examination report? 7 svarande
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 4 | | 57% |
much» | | 3 | | 42% |
Genomsnitt: 2.42 How difficult was the examination report? 7 svarande
little» | | 2 | | 28% |
neutral» | | 5 | | 71% |
much» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.71 21. Examination report 3Matrisfråga- Don"t know ter.»
How relevant was the examination report for achieving the goals? 7 svarande
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 3 | | 42% |
much» | | 4 | | 57% |
Genomsnitt: 2.57 How was the workload compared to the relevance (maximum points given) of the examination report? 7 svarande
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 4 | | 57% |
much» | | 3 | | 42% |
Genomsnitt: 2.42 How difficult was the examination report? 7 svarande
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 7 | | 100% |
much» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 22. What do you think was the best with the examination reports?- The third one»
- The discussion and analysis when talking with the other students.»
- it gave us more possibility to expand our knowledge and our capacity of researc for new sources. »
- very good articles that gave me a very good view of the issues in the subject»
- As I mentionned before, the fact that there were "open questions" it allowed to write about different issues in different perpesctives.
They did not have many questions: 3/4 is enough, in my opinion.»
23. What do you think was the worst with the examination reports?- the first one»
- To understand the question.»
- being forced to work with several people. it was really complicated for me to schedule meetings due to other courses and because each person has different lectures and thus different schedules
»
- Cannot think of any»
- Nothing in particular.»
Literature seminar24. What is relevant for your learning experience with a literature seminar?*8 svarande
Yes, very much» | | 5 | | 71% |
Yes, some» | | 2 | | 28% |
Neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
No, not really» | | 0 | | 0% |
Not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 1.28 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - it was really positive the seminar experience. arguing about the same subject with people with different backgrounds was definitely a good wat to see different points of view and to polish my personal opinions.» (Yes, very much)
- It is good to exchange ideas and point of views as it enriches the content of the report. Sould be kept for the next year.» (Yes, some)
25. How was the workload connected to the literature seminar?*8 svarande
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 4 | | 80% |
Low» | | 1 | | 20% |
No opinion» | | 3 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.2 26. How well did the administration of the literature seminar work - handouts etc.8 svarande
very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 2 | | 25% |
well» | | 4 | | 50% |
very well» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 4 Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 1.28
Case studyThis section deals with the case study work.27. How relevant was the case study for achieving the course goals?8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
much» | | 2 | | 25% |
very much» | | 6 | | 75% |
Genomsnitt: 4.75 28. How was the workload for the case study?8 svarande
very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
little» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 4 | | 50% |
much» | | 4 | | 50% |
very much» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 29. How well did the administration, e.g. guidance, handins, etc work?8 svarande
very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 12% |
good» | | 3 | | 37% |
very good» | | 4 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.37 30. What do you think was the best with the case study?- I think it was a good instrument to became familiar with the subject»
- The discussions taking place during the calculations and during the report writing process.»
- the best with the case study was the opportunity to work with real cases or at least that could actually be compared to a real scenario.»
- The connection between the LCA and the strategy»
- The fact that is it in group: exchange ideas and help each other in the different tasks. Also it allowed us to "compose strategies towards sustainable logistics". It incentivated us to think about consequences and get an holistic view about the problem.»
31. What do you think was the worst with the case study?- some of the deadlines, too close to the examination report»
- To know how broad and wide the discussion should be.»
- the group was not that commited and that was felt in the quality of the work.»
- Nothing»
Summarizing questions32. What is your general impression of the course?8 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 4 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 4 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.5 - It is excellent to use handins as examination since it is far more relevant then an exam.» (Excellent)
33. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The handins and the case study instead of an exam.»
- The seminars and the case study»
- the smaller hand ins. Literature seminar.»
- Guest lecturerers»
- Literature Semiar, Home examination report, Case study, Guest lectures with MHB and MBj.»
34. What should definitely be changed to next year?- maybe reorganizing a little bit the deadlines»
- Cannot think of anything»
- Try to arrange a final seminar to discuss the course content: probably divide it in two slots if there are too many students.»
- Better feedback regarding home-exam 1.»
35. Can you recommend others to attend this course?8 svarande
Yes» | | 8 | | 100% |
No» | | 0 | | 0% |
no opinion» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1 - I found the topic interesting and the course were well structured» (Yes)
- because it is a really interesting course and it gave a new way to see the logistics system and freigh transport, now i definitely look with different eyes to the amount of traffic in the cities.» (Yes)
- Important to be aware about environmental thinking, course well structured.» (Yes)
36. Additional comments- Excellent work, I really liked it. »
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 1.28 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.07* obligatoriska frågor
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|