ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course Evaluation Advanced Vehicle Dynamics 2012, TME102

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-05-29 - 2012-09-15
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 25%
Kontaktperson: Mathias Lidberg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Övriga studenter

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

<15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»2 25%
Around 30 hours/week»1 12%
Around 40 hours/week»3 37%
>50 hours/week»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- It was too much I think. I"ve spend too much time on the hand in assignments.» (Around 40 hours/week)

2. Attendance on lectures

How many per cent of the lectures did you attend?

8 svarande

<25%»0 0%
25-50%»0 0%
50-75%»1 12%
>75%»7 87%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

3. Attendence on problem solving sessions

How many per cent of the problem solving sessions did you attend?

8 svarande

<25%»1 12%
25-50%»1 12%
50-75%»1 12%
>75%»5 62%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.25

4. Attendance on assignments sessions

How many per cent of the lectures did you attend?

8 svarande

<25%»1 12%
25-50%»0 0%
50-75%»1 12%
>75%»6 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Teaching and course administration

5. What is your opinion of the main course text book by Pacejka?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 28%
Rather good»5 71%
Very good»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- It is very expansive and it is hard to understand because the definition (like COS, names of variables) in the lecture differ from the ones in the book.» (Rather bad)
- It was quite hard to get a grip on. Could be good with some reading instructions and questions to be answered by us, for us to know what is important.» (Rather bad)
- Did not spend that much time reading in it which was a shame.» (Rather good)

6. What is your opinion of the lecture notes?

7 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»2 28%
Very good»5 71%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- A definition of the variables would be nice. Including the units e.g. a [m/s²] acceleration» (Rather good)

7. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 71%
Very well»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- Old exams could have come out earlier» (Rather well)

8. What is your opinion of the material selected for the lectures?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»5 62%
Very good»3 37%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- Could be more about analysis such as the gain and frequency response.» (Rather good)

9. What is your opinion of the teaching in lectures?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»1 12%
Very good»7 87%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.87

10. What is your opinion of the material selected for the problem solving sessions?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 28%
Rather good»4 57%
Very good»1 14%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- Would be better to get the tasks before the session to try the tasks on ourselfs» (Rather bad)

11. What is your opinion of the teaching in the problem solving sessions?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 28%
Rather good»5 71%
Very good»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- I didn"t understand that much but it depended more on that a had to spend all my time at the hand in assignment and didn"t have time to go through the material of/for the problem solving sessions.» (Rather good)

12. What is your opinion of the material selected for the assignments sessions?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 14%
Rather good»6 85%
Very good»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- Less guidance would be nice» (Rather good)
- I think that the assignments are usefull but, I still think they take up to much time which takes away usfull hours in the pajeca.» (Rather good)
- There are no litterature about different suspensions set-ups that we are supposed to know...» (Rather good)

13. What is your opinion of the work load of the assignments?

8 svarande

Very bad»4 50%
Rather bad»4 50%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 1.5

- To much time spent on matlab fault search and to little on analyising the results!» (Very bad)
- Too much as mentioned earlier.» (Very bad)
- This needs to change. If we are to read 15 points each study period, then spending 60 to 70 percent of the time on only vehicle dynamics assignments is not ok. » (Very bad)

14. What is your opinion of teaching in assignments sessions?

7 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»5 83%
Very good»1 16%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- Can"t say. As the assignments are graded, we can"t get the help needed to progress with the assignments properly. » (?)
- Ulrich was very good which "saved" the total impression.» (Rather good)

15. What is your opinion about using Simulink as tool in this course?

- Good. Much more advanced equation systems can be solved in a simple way. However, there were some unexpected problems due to the program.»
- i would prefer something already working before and make some comparison between different configurations»
- Good»
- VERY GOOD! More of that!»
- Very good! »
- Good, I like simulink, it is a very useful tool.»
- Good program, but some kind of intro tutorial of how to use simulink would be helpful for those not familiar with it.»

16. What is your opinion about the lab at Stora Holm?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»3 37%
Very good»5 62%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.62

Study climate

17. How is the general study climate in the master programme?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 16%
Rather good»5 83%
Very good»0 0%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- I don"t think there is enough study places. We are tought to study in groups but there are not many rooms which makes it possible.» (Rather bad)

18. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»1 12%
Rather poor»1 12%
Rather good»3 37%
Very good»3 37%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Sorry to say, but due to how many hours are needed to complete the assignments and that they are graded the teaching assistants are not able to give us the help needed. » (Very poor)
- There was hard sometimes to ask questions between sessions because no one was at the office, easpically on mondays.» (Rather poor)
- Mattias did help a lot with the assignments which was not his job, thanks! It was rather bad that Ulrich were at Lindholmen a lot which made it hard to ask questions but he is very helpful when he is at Johanneberg and answer to mail as well.» (Rather good)

19. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 12%
Very well»6 75%
I did not seek cooperation»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 4

20. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

1 (Too low)»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 12%
4»3 37%
5 (Too high)»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.37

- The assignments were good and usefull but the workload for them were quite high.» (4)

Summarizing questions

21. How well did the course fullfill your expectations?

8 svarande

1 (not at all)»1 12%
2»1 12%
3»0 0%
4»4 50%
5 (very well)»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.62 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

22. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»1 12%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 25%
Good»4 50%
Excellent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- In the end, we actually didn"t have time to learn proper vehicle dynamics, but instead we get more programming hours. This was a problem in the basic vehicle dynamic course as well and this lead to not having a good background in vehicle dynamics when starting the advanced vehicle dynamics course. The course has good teachers, but the course structure and assignments are a real disaster. Changes are needed to be made. » (Poor)
- Too much to do with the assignments. » (Adequate)

23. What is your opinion of the material selected for the exam?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»2 28%
Very good»5 71%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.71

24. What is your opinion of the work load during the exam?

8 svarande

Very bad»1 12%
Rather bad»1 12%
Rather good»2 25%
Very good»4 50%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- Assignments requires way too much time to complete.» (Very bad)
- Could have been a five hour exam.» (Rather bad)

25. What is your opinion of the level of difficulty of the exam?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»2 28%
Very good»5 71%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- Its seemed to fit the goals of the course.» (Rather good)

26. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- stora holm»
- The lab at stora holm.»
- Ullrich, Assignment layout and problem solving sessions.»
- Most of the content of the course.»
- The lab, problem solving sessions and lecture notes.»

27. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- same variable names in all parts of the lecture would make the learning easier»
- more application on real suspension system»
- I dident have time to studey apparat from the assignments»
- The assignments should be more on analysis of the results and not matlab coding. We had almost no time to really understand the results of the assignments before deadline.»
- Cut down on the tasks of the hand in assignments.»
- Assignments not to be graded anymore as this surely increase the workload too much. Also reduce the required workload of the assignments. »

28. Additional comments

- Since i have been studying mechanical Enginering at chalmers i have not had a possibility to read rigid Body dynamics as is recomended....»
- Would be fun if you culd run a automotive project as a continuing on this course.»
- There should not be "good to have read Rigid Body Dynamics" because it is impossible to have done that for an Automotive Engineer due to its location in LP1. The course should adapt to this!!!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.62
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.62
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.65

Kursutvärderingssystem från