ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

12lp4MPMEI: IIN070 Course Evaluation

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-05-25 - 2012-06-10
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 65%
Kontaktperson: Jamal Nasir»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 30%
Around 20 hours/week»6 46%
Around 25 hours/week»3 23%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.92

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

2. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 30%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 15%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 53%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

3. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 90%
No, the goals are set too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

4. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 63%
Yes, definitely»3 27%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

- The tutors at the different seminars did not always give feedback and thus it is somewhat difficult to improve. Also, I think they took too less emphasis on the participation in discussions when they graded different seminars. » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

5. How do You value the mandatory introductory lectures?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 41%
Large extent»5 41%
Great extent»2 16%
Did not attend»0

Genomsnitt: 2.75

6. How do You value the seminar on Open innovation?

13 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»3 30%
Great extent»3 30%
Did not attend»3

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- It became better with after the course evaluation when a bit more structured discussion with a wrap up was pursued» (Large extent)
- The open innovation seminar taught me more about how to write research questions than open innovation, but it was valuable in that sense.» (Large extent)

7. How do You value the seminar on Value appropriation for environmental innovations?

13 svarande

Small extent»1 11%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»6 66%
Great extent»2 22%
Did not attend»4

Genomsnitt: 3

8. How do You value the seminar on Effectuation?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 28%
Large extent»5 71%
Great extent»0 0%
Did not attend»6

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- Too much focus on comparing it to the NISI approach» (Some extent)
- Poor communication regarding grading, but otherwise very interesting seminar. » (Large extent)

9. How do You value the seminar on Innovation capabilities?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 11%
Large extent»5 55%
Great extent»3 33%
Did not attend»4

Genomsnitt: 3.22

10. How do You value the seminar on Idea selection at the front-end of innovation?

13 svarande

Small extent»2 33%
Some extent»1 16%
Large extent»2 33%
Great extent»1 16%
Did not attend»7

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- The discussion never reached the same level as in the other seminars.» (Small extent)

11. How do You value the seminar on Political dimensions of innovation?

13 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»1 10%
Large extent»5 50%
Great extent»3 30%
Did not attend»3

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How do You value the seminar on Business Model Innnovation?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 50%
Large extent»3 37%
Great extent»1 12%
Did not attend»5

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- Did not really feel the enthusiasm from the lectuter, otherwise great subject and readings. » (Some extent)
- Interesting topic but I think that the seminar would give much more to everyone if the seminar leader prepared some kind of structure or idea to focus the seminar on.» (Large extent)

13. How do You value the seminar on The role of design in innovation?

12 svarande

Small extent»1 25%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 50%
Great extent»1 25%
Did not attend»8

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- The best seminar I went to! Really interesting when we were divided into groups and got to discuss our thoughts and forced to take the viewpoint of one or the other paper.» (Great extent)

14. How do You value the supervision support on the term paper from the teacher?

13 svarande

Small extent»1 12%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 25%
Great extent»5 62%
Did not seek supervision»5

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- We didn"t use it enough I"m afraid.» (Large extent)

15. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 7%
Large extent»9 69%
Great extent»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

16. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 7%
Rather well»9 69%
Very well»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- Some papers were hard to find» (Rather well)
- Changing of deadlines for hand-ins was not communicated clearly in time, and became very frustrating. Moving a seminar date after admission deadline and after we started preparing for this was very frustrating» (Rather well)

Study climate

17. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 7%
Rather good»1 7%
Very good»10 76%
I did not seek help»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

18. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 15%
Rather well»3 23%
Very well»8 61%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

19. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»1 7%
Low»3 23%
Adequate»5 38%
High»4 30%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- Fair and square for a MSc. programe» (High)

20. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 15%
Adequate»4 30%
High»5 38%
Too high»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

Summarizing questions

21. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 7%
Adequate»1 7%
Good»8 61%
Excellent»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The focus on argumentation was great and to learn how to build arguments, the seminars has also been interesting and it is nice to be a small class that really makes sure a discussion gets going.» (Excellent)
- Learnd alot. Different way to write papers which was great.» (Excellent)
- The most interesting course I"ve read so far» (Excellent)

22. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Great discussions in class should still be facilitated. Good with 4 readings for each seminar. »
- The introducing lecture about the importance of argumentation and how it is done. »
- The term paper.»
- The selection of five seminars out of eight»
- The term paper. It is a superb exercise in critical reasoning and academic communication»
- Seminar diversity»
- The good mix of different subjects»

23. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More influence from classes on the grades (ie from discussions)»
- More structure in the seminars so that one can feel after each seminar what you learnt and how to develop your knowledge. Also, more feedback on the hand-ins would be good, so that we can learn how to do it better each time. »
- Change the focus to discuss subject more than method. Fewer papers in each seminar gives more space for reflection. »
- Perhaps broaden the course to make it less "academic"? I.e. Give students a choice between the current setup and e.g. attend all seminars andwrite no/smaller term paper»

24. Additional comments

- I am very pleased with the course in general. »
- I do not think that I learned that much out of the course as I hoped to. I did not like way we should write the reflections of the papers, more focus on topic and less on method. The discussion gets boring otherwise since some people just sit an pinpoint that case studies are not possible to generalize. »
- Thanks!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75

Kursutvärderingssystem från