|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Reality Studio 2012, Ark 161/181Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2012-05-28 - 2012-06-08 Antal svar: 4 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 17% Kontaktperson: Catarina Östlund» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Arkitektur 300 hp
Goals and fullfilment of goals1. Learning outcomes in relation to the role of profession1) Understand the professional work in a broader perspective and find new tasks in an international context. 2) To broaden the understanding of one’,s own perspective and its limitations, through meetings with other professional and cultural perspectives. 3) To further develop a critical thinking and reflection on your professional role, and ethics as well as the need for life-long learning.4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 2. Learning outcomes in relation to "Sustainable development"1) Gain a broader understanding of the complexity behind differing international political visions of Sustainable Development.2) Provide evidence on the usefulness of design for sustainable development in different contexts. 3) To compare and assess different sources and statements concerning design for sustainable development. 4) To combine knowledge from different disciplines and sectors in proposals for actions and measures in design for sustainable development. 4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - I am a little bit dissatisfied with the collaboration with the kenyan students. I think it would have been much better to coordinate our schedule more with theirs» (Very good) 3. Learning out comes in relation to understanding and development of tools, methods and analysis1) Be able to understand the complexity of everyday life in specific cultural and social environments. 2) Be able to use systems analysis methods and tools for the inventory and analysis of the built environment in different local situations and contexts. 3) Be able to analyse a local situation from macro to micro levels. 4) Be able to critically search for information and assess the quality of different sources of information. 5) To incorporate a participatory and trans-disciplinary approach in the design process.4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.25 4. Learning out comes in relation to the design process especially the communicative and visual part of it.1) Be able to design and assess concrete proposals and solutions for local sustainable development. 2) Be able to visualise and communicate different proposals for clients, stakeholders and experts in different stages of the design process. 3) Be able to motivate different proposals with reference to scientific, or experience-based, knowledge and value-based arguments. 4) To combine scientific and artistic approaches in the design process.4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.75 - This was sometimes challenging due to the difficulties in communication due to the cultural differences.» (Sufficient) 5. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 6. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - It seems this course is a longer time, but the same number of credits?» (Too wide of a scope in relation to credits) Education and course administration7. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - It could have been better structured. » (Rather good) 8. Did you find the reflection exercises BEFORE the field study, lead by Pål and Sigrid, relevant and interesting?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.66 - It had interesting parts but felt to scattered to be fully relevant» (Quite much) 9. Did you find the reflection exercises AFTER the field study, lead by Pål and Sigrid, helped you to process your experience of being in Kisumu and the return to your studio work at Chalmers?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - Would have been better with reflection workshops in the beginning of the fieldstudy. Felt like we were already done with our reflections when we came back and that we did it more for them to understand» (Not very much) 10. Were the lectures and assignments in the period before the fieldstudy relevant? See schedule4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.75 - eatscape made no sense at all» (Not at all) 11. Was the time for preparation before the field study enough?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.66 - It didnt fully feel like relevant preparation, so it felt something in between too long and too short. The eatscape workshop was completely useless. But it is good with some kind of preparation so you get the opportunity to meet the class before you leave, and I appreciated the lectures» (No opinion) 12. What support have you got for your learning from course literature and other material?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.75 - Also helpful to learn better how to communicate in different cultural contexts.» (Rather big) 13. How did the organised activities during the field study work in terms of content and organisation? Visits to Maseno, tours, lectures and meetings.4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - too organized» (Rather bad) 14. How did the tutoring during the field study work, in terms of access and process?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 15. How did the balance of work between the Systems course/Conservation Course and Reality Studio work? Please specify which if the two courses you took!4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - I am in the MPARC programme and have the two courses Leadership and Architectural Competitions. The schedules conflict with MPDSD schedules.» (Rather bad) 16. How did the tutoring after the field study work, in terms of time, access and process?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Especially Jörgen Andreasens tutoring was very good » (Very good) 17. How do you rate the final presentation in terms of relevance of the feed-back and the organisation?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Some feedback was helpful, and other feedback was confusing or not helpful. It does seem good to have a little time after the presentation so that we can refine our final work.» (Rather good) Work environment18. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.5 19. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 20. How were the conditions during the field study, in terms of sense of security, sense of community and privacy etc.4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.25 - We took care of eachother. » (Rather good) Concluding questions21. What is your overall opinion of the course?4 svarande
Genomsnitt: 5 - Im very happy that I went even though I was very frustrated at times. » (Very good) 22. What should be preserved for next year?- everything but eatscape»- A long field study time. Access to those with much experience in East Africa, for example Inger Lise.» - the journal assignment, kitengela glass factory visit, kit mi kay visit, lectures at maseno and bondo (especially keep contact with Naomi from bondo), visit to the rainforest.» 23. What should be changed for next year?- no more eatscape»- It seemed like a lot of compulsory literature in the beginning, especially since some lecturers requested us to read some. The "Africa" book was really nice though. The air quality in our studio is very poor.» - Take away the eatscape workshop, more interaction with kenyan students, less bus tours, household studies before project work» 24. Other comments- We talked briefly with a Dutch development consultant who is coordinating the AFD team doing a structural plan of Kisumu. He may be a good person to do a lecture next time, either in Kisumu or in Nairobi.»- thank you. Even though I have many complaints I really think it is important to keep this course. It is very relevant»
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%