Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Course evaluation MPM052 2012, MPM052
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-05-23 - 2012-05-29 Antal svar: 7 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 43% Kontaktperson: Johan Bankel» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.7 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 2 | | 28% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 4 | | 57% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 1 | | 14% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.85 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 7 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 14% |
75%» | | 4 | | 57% |
100%» | | 2 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 4.14
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?7 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 7 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 4 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.7 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 7 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?7 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 14% |
Yes, definitely» | | 6 | | 85% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.85 - The calculation parts were very nicely made... the could have been a little mor advanced ...» (Yes, definitely)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?7 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 28% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 42% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 3 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?7 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 28% |
Great extent» | | 5 | | 71% |
Genomsnitt: 3.71 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?7 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 42% |
Very well» | | 4 | | 57% |
Genomsnitt: 3.57
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?7 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 7 | | 100% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - I like that it was a small class» (Very good)
10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?7 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very well» | | 7 | | 100% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 11. How was the course workload?7 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 14% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 71% |
High» | | 1 | | 14% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 12. How was the total workload this study period?7 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 14% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 57% |
High» | | 2 | | 28% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.14
Additional questions13. Level of information presented in the course was…,7 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable» | | 6 | | 85% |
Too High» | | 1 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 2.14 14. Do you think the course should cover more or fewer topics7 svarande
More topics» | | 1 | | 14% |
Fewer topics» | | 3 | | 42% |
No change» | | 3 | | 42% |
Genomsnitt: 2.28 - some more about the production of the fibers would have been interesting ...» (More topics)
15. Tutorial problems helped to better understand computational aspects7 svarande
Agree» | | 7 | | 100% |
Hesitant» | | 0 | | 0% |
Disagree» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1 - Very good with the matlab lab ...» (Agree)
16. Lab session was helpful to understand the laminate theory7 svarande
Agree» | | 7 | | 100% |
Hesitant» | | 0 | | 0% |
Disagree» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1 17. Diary was helpful to realize the engineering applicability of composite materials and connections between parts A-G7 svarande
Agree» | | 7 | | 100% |
Hesitant» | | 0 | | 0% |
Disagree» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1 18. Compendium was a helpful source7 svarande
Agree» | | 7 | | 100% |
Hesitant» | | 0 | | 0% |
Disagree» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1 19. Handing out solutions to tutorial problems via student portal was working and was useful7 svarande
Agree» | | 7 | | 100% |
Hesitant» | | 0 | | 0% |
Disagree» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1 20. The guest lecture was motivating/helpful7 svarande
Agree» | | 6 | | 85% |
Hesitant» | | 1 | | 14% |
Disagree» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.14 - More guest lectures! Study visit? A more practical lab? Can we help formula student because they were making a composite part to their car now ... would have been nice with some practical experience!» (Agree)
21. Organization of the course was transparent and caring7 svarande
Agree» | | 6 | | 85% |
Hesitant» | | 1 | | 14% |
Disagree» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.14 22. On the whole you would …,..7 svarande
Recommend the course» | | 6 | | 85% |
Hesitant» | | 1 | | 14% |
Not recommend the course» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.14
Summarizing questions23. What is your general impression of the course?7 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 14% |
Good» | | 3 | | 42% |
Excellent» | | 3 | | 42% |
Genomsnitt: 4.28 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 24. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- the lab session»
- The Professor»
- Everything but add a practical laminate-making lab and some more about manufacturing of the fibers ... the workload will still be okay ...»
- Guest lecture,sample composite specimens, tutorials and immense use of compendium»
- Guest Lecture»
25. What should definitely be changed to next year?- the 20% in each part of the exam»
- Demonstration on how to manufacture composite, atleast simple hand lay up process could have been given.»
- Practicals can be more like in a demo way apart from just computing.
CMC lectures need to be sharpened»
26. Additional comments- To be honest, I was expecting more imformation about nanocomposite.»
- I personally feel that the work load for this course is low and it could have been higher.»
- There were like questions in the exam in the CMC part which was not included in the compendium or either there was no upload of the slides about that in the course homepage. Also with MMC question too.This two questions were completely new.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.28
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.28 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.82
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|