Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Functional materials, TIF115

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-05-22 - 2012-06-04
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Bengt-Erik Mellander»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 60%
Around 20 hours/week»2 40%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.4

- Due to several overlaps with other courses (Superconductivity, semiconductor material physics etc.) the needed work load was lowered for me. I don"t think I"m representative in this regard.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 20%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 20%
100%»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

- too many courses» (25%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 40%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Not sure what to know at the exam.» (?)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 40%
Yes, definitely»1 20%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»2 40%
Some extent»2 40%
Large extent»1 20%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- I had use of the lessons to different extent depending on the teacher. Igor Zoric presented very informative lectures.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 40%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- The slides were most often very good as lecture slides, which meant that they were not that good as reading material. As the book was on somewhat a lower level than the lectures this discrepancy could be resolved if the lecturers produced lecture notes in text format. However the slides should not be changed, as more information on them would make the lectures worse.» (Some extent)
- I have read most of the course book. » (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 40%
Rather well»2 40%
Very well»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Sometimes hard to follow deadlines and so on if you didn"t searched for it specific.» (Rather badly)
- A lot of information was missing, both from the homepage and when it came to information presented in class. The project was very hard to understand the guidelines to, which was also clear in the posters at the presentation. I also found it hard to grasp what key topics to take home from the lectures.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 20%
Very good»3 60%
I did not seek help»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 4

- All the teachers seamed eager to answer questions if we had any.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 20%
Rather well»1 20%
Very well»3 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

11. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Maybe we could have had the project sooner to spread the load more evenly. If you followed along in the book it was easier to keep a steady work load.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 60%
High»1 20%
Too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 20%
Adequate»2 40%
Good»2 40%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I liked most of the content, but was not pleased with the very unclear guidelines for projekt, lectures, exam and so on. All the information should be on the homepage, preferably from the start of the course.» (Fair)
- The lectures could be more structured. You don"t always know what is important from the lectures. Hard to follow the lecture notes if you have not been to the lecture (and sometimes even after that) and everything"s not in the course litterature. Maybe have lecture notes where it"s more straight foreward what is goning on (especially those with many equations) or if possible even have some kind of compendium.» (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- It was nice to do a project. Fun with another form of presentation like the poster. Could be more info about how the poster should be formed. Don"t think many of the students have done posters before.»
- The lectures by Igor!»
- Project with poster presentation was interesing, if the information could be better. It was a first, which is good.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Show in the lectures what is important. Igor was very good on this, but in the other lectures it was unclear.»
- State clearly that thhis course is a somewhat repetitive course in several fields that many students have already studied. So the motivation to study superconductors when the proper course was in quarter 2 seemed half meaningless.»
- Clearer marking on what level the course is on. Some lectures contained much mathematical formula, and some calculational examples whereas the exam did not. It was hard to know on what level of understanding the exam would be on.»
- The information has to be clearer and more thorough. It would also be good if it could be made more clear what is the emphasis of each lecture, it was hard to seperate background info from key info. »

16. Additional comments

- Igor - highest quality of teaching - as usual»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.2

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.2
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.55

Kursutvärderingssystem från