Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MTT065 - In-service inspection technologies Q4

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-05-22 - 2012-06-04
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 46%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 33%
Around 20 hours/week»3 50%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»1 16%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 16%
50%»1 16%
75%»4 66%
100%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 16%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 33%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 33%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 50%
No, the goals are set too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 66%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»2 40%
Some extent»1 20%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

7. What was your impression of the lab exercises?

6 svarande

Poor»2 33%
Fair»1 16%
Adequate»3 50%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

- They were based on the NDT group"s last research not based on what could be usefull in our future. most of them were not useful, but just a game, that is to say.» (Poor)
- Tycker att labarna är dåligt utförda, de skulle kunna ha gjort så himla mycket bättre. Dessutom är det bara dumt att sätta en labtid på fyra timmar som mycket sällan fylls ut. Tycker att FL + lab borde ligga på lindholmen måndag eftermiddag så laben kan göras med föreläsningen färskt i minnet» (Poor)

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»1 16%
Some extent»2 33%
Large extent»3 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»3 50%
Rather well»1 16%
Very well»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 16%
Very good»5 83%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 16%
Rather well»1 16%
Very well»4 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

12. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 16%
Adequate»4 66%
High»1 16%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

13. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»1 16%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 33%
High»2 33%
Too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»2 33%
Fair»2 33%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»2 33%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Good teachers»
- Laborations»
- A better introduction to what the course is to obtain and what the purpose of the course is. The first lecture is crucial in my point of view. Make the introductory lecture more famailirizing with the different techniques and how they are amplied rather than abbrivations of things that make no sense to people not familiar with non-destructive testing techniques. »
- I really liked the structure of the course, with labs and lab reports. I find it easier to learn things when you have to do some practical work instead of just studying to an exam.»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Lab och föreläsning måndag em på lindholmen. Ha föreläsning och sen köra lab direkt. Att ha det som det är nu är dåligt»
- Better labPM"s»
- Better administration of laboratory information, get it out earlier on course webpage. And make clearer about the last lab POD/SimSundt - one report etc.»
- The introductory lesson.»

17. Additional comments

- Bra tillgänglighet med lärare som gärna hjälper till, mycket bra»
- I really appreciated the helpfulness all at your institution showed. There was never a problem to get help if you needed it.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.33

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.33
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.33

Kursutvärderingssystem från