Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MCC011 - Non-equilibrium processes in physics, chemistry and biology
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-05-22 - 2012-06-04 Antal svar: 4 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 80% Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.3 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 1 | | 33% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 1 | | 33% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 33% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 4 svarande
0%» | | 1 | | 25% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 1 | | 25% |
100%» | | 2 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?3 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 33% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 1 | | 33% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 1 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.3 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 1 | | 33% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 2 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 2.66 - It"s a really large course» (No, the goals are set too high)
5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?3 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 33% |
Yes, definitely» | | 2 | | 66% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.66
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?3 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 66% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.66 - The lectures seems to be aimed at an audience which already has a general understanding of the topic.» (Some extent)
- The lectures where very difficult to follow some times a clear structure with headings would be appreciated» (Large extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?3 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 66% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.66 - The lecture notes could be updated to fit with the current course. When there was no exact directions of what part of the lecture notes that were covered in a specific lecture it was sometimes difficult to find everything when trying to read about it» (Large extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?3 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 66% |
Very well» | | 1 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 - More details about exam should be on homepage» (Rather well)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?3 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 33% |
Very good» | | 2 | | 66% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?3 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very well» | | 3 | | 100% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - I doubt I would have managed all the homeproblems without the help and discussions with fellow students as a lot of math was needed, some that I hadn"t studied before» (Very well)
11. How was the course workload?3 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
High» | | 3 | | 100% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 12. How was the total workload this study period?4 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 25% |
High» | | 2 | | 50% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 4
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?3 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 33% |
Good» | | 2 | | 66% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- be more clear during the lectures, add headings for all topics and equations. »
- A clear structure during lectures and more "physical" home problems rather than mathematical. Perhaps more calculations and examples/applied use during recitations»
16. Additional comments- I would have liked a practice exam. I felt that the exam question were written in a different way than the homeproblems. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.66
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.66 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.66
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|