ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

FMI040 - Semiconductor materials physics Q4

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-05-22 - 2012-06-04
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 55%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 6 66%

Around 20 hours/week» 2 22%

Around 25 hours/week» 1 11%

Around 30 hours/week» 0 0%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.44

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%» 1 10%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 2 20%

75%» 5 50%

100%» 2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- Most lectures, no recitations» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 0 0%

The goals are difficult to understand» 1 11%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 5 55%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 2 22%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 7 77%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.77

- With a solid background in solid state physics the goals are clearly set to low. I imagine that this is different for people with other backgrounds.» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 6 66%

Yes, definitely» 3 33%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- Never any questions on band edge offsets.» (To some extent)
- The lectures focused on understanding the physics of the materials whereas the exam was partly based on over simplified models that didn"t really give much understanding of the materials, case in point the organic molecule model as a infinitely high well with finite size. If such models are to be used the frame work of the needs to be made clearer. I.e. how good/wrong they are.» (To some extent)
- The focus of the lectures does not really coincide with the focus of the exam.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent» 1 11%

Some extent» 5 55%

Large extent» 3 33%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

- The lectures was mostly good, but I think the information contained had to much overlap with basic solid state physics which is recommended prerequisite for the course. If such parts (I am mainly thinking of phonons, lattice etc.) are to be included anyway the lectures could be marked as extra teaching for those who haven"t got a good grasp of the subject.» (Some extent)
- The recitations were really poorly structured and just a waste of time» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent» 1 11%

Some extent» 3 33%

Large extent» 4 44%

Great extent» 1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly» 1 11%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 6 66%

Very well» 2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3

- It took too long time befoure the tutorial exercises were posted on the webpage.» (Very badly)
- Some material (recitations, project descriptions) came up late, otherwise it was fine.» (Rather well)
- Earlier start of the project! I was away for half a week in the start of the project, which was hard to compensate for as the time was cramped. By giving out them earlier it"s possible for the students to plan their work for the period.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 2 22%

Very good» 4 44%

I did not seek help» 3 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 3 33%

Very well» 6 66%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

11. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low» 2 20%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 6 60%

High» 1 10%

Too high» 1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

12. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 11%

Adequate» 7 77%

High» 1 11%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor» 1 11%

Fair» 2 22%

Adequate» 3 33%

Good» 2 22%

Excellent» 1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I think the bar was set to low, or otherwise the course plan should make it clearer that this is not an advanced level course.» (Fair)
- Since the level was put to low and the tutorials were rather confusing. » (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Lab sessions»
- Projects»
- The project was good and interesting. Good format with the quasi-conference and quasi-article.»
- The projects and labs. A nice way to learn more. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Home excercise assignments in place of project and presentations»
- More focus on Silicon/what is used in industry.»
- Clearer information on the course plan about the level of the course, and if it is meant to be an advanced level course the material cowered needs to be extended.»
- The tutorials should be better organized. If there is 20 questions, choose maby 7 and go through them properly. It would be nice if the exersices were upploded to the homepage befoure the tutorials, so you could lock at them befour. »
- The recitations. Same focus on exam as on lectures.»

16. Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.5

Kursutvärderingssystem från