Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPTSE VT-12 Applied industrial ecology, ENM 021

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-05-22 - 2012-06-08
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 64%
Kontaktperson: Rickard Ambring»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 11%
Around 20 hours/week»3 33%
Around 25 hours/week»2 22%
Around 30 hours/week»3 33%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- It was a little bit high load.» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 33%
100%»6 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 22%
Yes, definitely»5 55%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The bulk of the courses was the two projects - we had few lectures. So it was actually surprising to have an exam! » (To some extent)
- The examination is based on memorization. Somebody that learns by heart , through repetition , all the concepts from each subject will score high. Even though he doesn´,t know how to apply the concepts really well. » (To some extent)
- In order to answer the questions we needed to know what is behind the question and explain it in own words. Just knowing the question from past exams is not enough to answer. So I think it was good exam.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 11%
Large extent»5 55%
Great extent»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- Since I was not familiar with the concept of IE before the class, lectures were helpful to understand overall picture of IE.» (Large extent)
- I would have appreciated more lectures!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 33%
Large extent»3 33%
Great extent»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Maybe it could be less articles but with a higher quality» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 55%
Very well»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»9 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- There were several supervisions and the opportunities to get the feedback. We could discuss a lot with my supervisor.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 11%
Very well»8 88%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

- I could work with my project mate very well. And there were only about 10 students in the class and we knew each other. Small class was good to discuss in the seminar.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 55%
High»4 44%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

- We spent a lot of time for this course. But it was worth it.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 22%
High»4 44%
Too high»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

- Other course had also big project.» (High)
- Project in the LCA course combined with the assignments in this course was often colliding.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»7 77%
Excellent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 4.22 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The assignments, because they were really interesting and we learnt a lot while doing them.»
- The two projects.»
- The assignments have been a very good learning instrument.»
- The assignments and the literature seminars. »
- Small project group (2~3 people per each group). Small class discussion (seminar). Opportunities to discuss with the supervisor. »
- Both Assignments!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The seminars can be better. Sometimes students came late and unprepared. Then I don"t think that they should be able to participate in the seminars. Maybe the students can hand in their preparations in the beginning of the seminars and the ones who don"t will have to leave.»
- The IOA part should be more focused on explaining the method as well as the application in a strucured way. Also the exercise could have been clearer. The 3 introduction lectures (explanations of methods and assignments) included a lot of information. It was quite hard to concentrate, maybe this could be restructured a bit.»
- More importance should be given to the projects and less to the examination. »
- The exam is not very nourishing. Perhaps, if the group is small , the assignments could be presented individually and that could add up for the grade of the course. »
- The input-output analyse part was kind of strange»

16. Additional comments

- Ulrika is one of the nicest teachers I ever met on Chalmers!»
- It was very good that the couse content was changed so that it wasn"t too similar to the ESA course. I think this worked very well!»
- If there are more guest lectures it would be interesting and good to understand more practical application of IE.»
- Make the lecture on IOA clear and provide materials which help to understand the basis of IOA»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.22

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.22
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.8

Kursutvärderingssystem från