Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
BAC_2012, VTA125
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-05-16 - 2012-06-07 Antal svar: 13 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 65% Kontaktperson: Jens Forssén»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.13 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 6 | | 46% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 7 | | 53% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.53 - Really hard to say» (Around 20 hours/week)
2. How large part of the lectures offered did you attend? 13 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 1 | | 7% |
50%» | | 3 | | 23% |
75%» | | 6 | | 46% |
100%» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 3.84 - with two small kids it is hard to attend all lectures» (75%)
- The ones i missed where due to the workload in another course» (75%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus (see http://www.student.chalmers.se/sp/course?course_id=16737, In English) states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. To what extent do you feel you have acquired the knowledge, skills and attitudes stated in the learning outcomes?13 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 6 | | 46% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 38% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 15% |
Genomsnitt: 2.69 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?13 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 13 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?13 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Yes, definitely» | | 9 | | 69% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 3.15 6. How did the written exam reflect the course?13 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 44% |
Well» | | 4 | | 44% |
Very well» | | 1 | | 11% |
I do not know/have not been examined yet» | | 4 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 7. How did the project work reflect the course?13 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Badly» | | 1 | | 7% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 23% |
Well» | | 6 | | 46% |
Very well» | | 3 | | 23% |
I do not know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.84 - Only done half of it yet» (Well)
Teaching and course administration8. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?13 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 30% |
Large extent» | | 9 | | 69% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.69 9. How was the presentation speed in the lectures?13 svarande
much too slow» | | 0 | | 0% |
a bit too slow» | | 3 | | 23% |
adequate» | | 10 | | 76% |
a bit too fast» | | 0 | | 0% |
much too fast» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.76 10. To what extent have the lecture notes been of help for your learning?13 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 23% |
Large extent» | | 8 | | 61% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.69 - The script includes a lot of derivation of formulas which do not seem useful for me. I would have prefered to see more explanations instead.» (Some extent)
- The community noise part was sometimes quite poorly explained and hard to understand, maybe also a book about it where it is possible to find more information about turbulence and fresnelzones and so on. The building acoustics was good to have a sum in the lecture notes and further reading in the book. » (Large extent)
11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?13 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 7 | | 53% |
Very well» | | 6 | | 46% |
Genomsnitt: 3.46 12. How did you percieve the correction of the report?13 svarande
too demanding» | | 0 | | 0% |
adequate» | | 13 | | 100% |
not demanding enough» | | 0 | | 0% |
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - The half part» (adequate)
- Impressing to have the exam back after so short time, really nice since the exam was still fresh in memory. Very good job!» (adequate)
Study climate13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help of the teacher?13 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 15% |
Very good» | | 11 | | 84% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.84 14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help of the course assistent?13 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 7% |
Very good» | | 12 | | 92% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.92 15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?13 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 15% |
Very well» | | 9 | | 69% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 2 | | 15% |
Genomsnitt: 4 16. How was the course workload?13 svarande
Too low» | | 1 | | 7% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 11 | | 84% |
High» | | 1 | | 7% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.92 - Good with the division of the homeassignment in two parts so that the work load is not too big in the end. Always nice to have a second hand in do that we can learn better from our misstakes and also understand more clearly what the assistant want.» (Adequate)
17. How was the total workload this study period?13 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 15% |
High» | | 7 | | 53% |
Too high» | | 4 | | 30% |
Genomsnitt: 4.15 - I think that the RAC course took to much time from all other courses, so i couldnt focus as much as i wanted on this course and TA2» (Too high)
- unfortunately, alot of collisions with RAC-activities at the beginning of the study period.» (Too high)
Summarizing questions18. What is your general impression of the course?13 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 7% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 38% |
Good» | | 6 | | 46% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.53 19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The home assignement was very interesting.»
- Some formulars in the exercises are neither in the handout nor in the book. Like Internal loss factor»
- The project work, it is really good. »
- Tentamen»
- Jens and Wolfgangs lectures»
20. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The lectures should be guided by the script but should give more information than the script. I got bored sometimes in the lectures because it did not differ from the script that I have read already.»
- Better text about community noise, clearer questions in the home assignment, most of the time is spent on understanding the question.»
- The tentamen should weight more then the home assignment in points for the grade»
- The questions in the assignment is sometimes unclear and blurry»
- I think there sould be more exercises during the period. Also the solutions to the exams and problems in the class are very confusing, they must be better and more synchronized.»
- There were too many repetitions of other courses.»
21. Additional comments- Give more explanations, the derivation of formulas are not as interesting.»
- Fun course!»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|