Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPCSN 1112-4 Parallel and distributed real-time systems, EDA421
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-05-23 - 2012-06-10 Antal svar: 18 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 56% Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.18 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 3 | | 16% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 3 | | 16% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 4 | | 22% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 6 | | 33% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 2 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 3.05 - Mot less during first 3 weeks » (Around 30 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 18 svarande
0%» | | 1 | | 5% |
25%» | | 2 | | 11% |
50%» | | 1 | | 5% |
75%» | | 4 | | 22% |
100%» | | 10 | | 55% |
Genomsnitt: 4.11 - I"m working full time» (0%)
- Missed a few» (75%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.
To review the learning outcomes for this course, click here. (Opens in new window)3. How understandable are the course goals?17 svarande
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 3 | | 17% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 14 | | 82% |
Genomsnitt: 2.82 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.16 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 16 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - a bit too high!But again I guess it is an advanced master course» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?17 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 5% |
Yes, definitely» | | 14 | | 82% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 2 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 3.05 - most of the job was done in the homeworks» (Yes, definitely)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?17 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 9 | | 52% |
Great extent» | | 8 | | 47% |
Genomsnitt: 3.47 - Sessions for homeassignments could be better» (Large extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?18 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 11% |
Large extent» | | 10 | | 55% |
Great extent» | | 6 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.22 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?18 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 22% |
Very well» | | 14 | | 77% |
Genomsnitt: 3.77
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?18 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 11% |
Very good» | | 15 | | 83% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 5% |
Genomsnitt: 3.94 - the best help ever in a course» (Very good)
10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?18 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 16% |
Very well» | | 15 | | 83% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.83 - I worked with a friend» (Very well)
11. How was the course workload?18 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 8 | | 44% |
High» | | 9 | | 50% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 5% |
Genomsnitt: 3.61 12. How was the total workload this study period?18 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 27% |
High» | | 11 | | 61% |
Too high» | | 2 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 3.83 - Almost nothing in the other course. Very high in this one.» (High)
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?17 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 6 | | 35% |
Excellent» | | 11 | | 64% |
Genomsnitt: 4.64 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Home assignments.»
- Homeassignments were really good»
- teacher»
- The session about currently open problems.»
- almost everything»
- everything»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- NP-stuff, is really hard to understand. More of that stuff maybe?! i"ve read the real time 1 course, so this course was quite easy. I think that i might be much harder for those that have not read that course.
»
- -»
- exams felt like a extra burden, the total evaluation can be done only with home assignments»
- exam instruction»
16. Additional comments- -»
- Maybe add a enterprise visit can be interesting.»
- Really good course! Very well organized. Very good labs to make us understand all the different part of the course. Good handouts. One of the best organized course I had.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.64
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.64 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.91
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|