ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPSOF 1112-4 Model-based testing, DAT260|DIT848

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-05-23 - 2012-06-10
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 41%
Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»

Opening question

1. Which university do you belong to?

Some of our courses are taken jointly by students of the University of Gothenburg and Chalmers University of Technology. In order for us to be able to look at the answers of each student group separately, we would like you to indicate which university you are registered at.

14 svarande

University of Gothenburg»4 28%
Chalmers University of Technology»10 71%

Genomsnitt: 1.71

2. Do you have background in the following areas?

Mention in the comments in which courses did you get the background, and which functional programming language do you know if applicable.

14 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

Automata»4 28%
Modeling»10 71%
Testing in general»7 50%
Other verification techniques»5 35%
Functional programming»6 42%
QuickCheck»4 28%
Graph theory»6 42%

- Had no previous experience of functional programming. For me this was not a big dealbreaker even though I definately would have benefited from having taken a functional programming course.» (Modeling, Testing in general, Other verification techniques, Graph theory)
- Mandatory IT-bachelor courses. Functional programming, Testing, Debugging & verification, and finite automata (all on chalmers)» (Automata, Modeling, Testing in general, Other verification techniques, Functional programming, QuickCheck, Graph theory)
- Model based engineering Functional programming. Haskell erlang Parallel programmering» (Modeling, Functional programming, QuickCheck, Graph theory)
- No, I do not have any experience about functional programming» ()
- Small experience in functional programming» (Modeling, Testing in general, Other verification techniques, Functional programming)

Your own effort

3. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 35%
Around 20 hours/week»6 42%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»2 14%
At least 35 hours/week»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

4. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 14%
75%»6 42%
100%»6 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

5. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 7%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 7%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

6. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 15%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 76%
No, the goals are set too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 1.92

- The course could have a higher level since it is a masters course and students should be able to understand the basic concepts a bit faster than this course progressed.» (No, the goals are set too low)
- Considering /my/ background they are too low, but in general they may be reasonable.» (No, the goals are set too low)

7. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»2 15%
To some extent»5 38%
Yes, definitely»6 46%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

- The professor made up a system to prevent having many people with high grades. Please someone explain to him that when students don"t get high grades it"s a professor"s failure, not a title of pride.» (No, not at all)
- The exam had very ambiguous questions and looking a later questions did at some parts help the understanding of the answer for early questions.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

8. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»2 14%
Some extent»5 35%
Large extent»6 42%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- The lectures were a bit too slow and it seems unfair to ask the lecturer to go faster if there are students that have trouble understanding.» (Some extent)
- To show more concrete examples of FSMs would be great though.» (Large extent)

9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»3 21%
Some extent»4 28%
Large extent»6 42%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.35

- I haven"t used the course literature or any other material besides the assignments, which I went through the day before the exam.» (Small extent)
- The course book was very good at explaining the topics. It was also very good that the book was available in electronic form from the library» (Large extent)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»1 7%
Rather badly»2 14%
Rather well»7 50%
Very well»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 3

- There is a coding mistake in the news section of the site that results in new items are not shown until one goes to another page and then back to the home page. It was also very bad timing that the CSE sites went down the day before the exam, and I had to pussle together pieces of the site using webcache and downloaded pdfs.» (Rather badly)
- CSE broke down the day before the exam...» (Rather well)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»1 7%
Rather poor»2 14%
Rather good»2 14%
Very good»8 57%
I did not seek help»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- Gerardo did his best to engage the class in his lectures and was always answering questions during the lecture, in breaks and for some time afterwards.» (Very good)

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 7%
Rather well»2 14%
Very well»8 57%
I did not seek cooperation»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

13. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»1 7%
Low»2 14%
Adequate»7 50%
High»4 28%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The weekly exercises could be made more interesting and should probably be made mandatory to provide more basis for the final grade.» (Too low)
- Score to Gerardo! » (Adequate)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»9 64%
High»5 35%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- entirely due to my other course.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»3 21%
Fair»3 21%
Adequate»2 14%
Good»5 35%
Excellent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.85 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Guest lectures at the end of the course»
- No mandatory assignments. This normal course workload. Open book exam because this is not a memory test. This course"s flexibility "cause we are here to learn and not to get stressed.»
- literature materials»
- Covered many different aspects of testing and model based testing. John Hughes"s guest lecture.»
- The exam format is good and should be adopted in more courses. It could be improved but don"t use the standard Chalmers exam please.»
- slides, assignments and feedback. »
- weekly assignment»
- The quickcheck part, preferably extended to three weeks instead of two.»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Start with MBT earlier in the course, the workload during the first few weeks was rather low.»
- make excercises mandatory, and increase difficulty on the first ones.»
- As I said, it would be great to get more examples of FSMs done because it took some time until know exactly how we should do the assignments.»
- Exam evaluation is not good because if I lose one question even if I got 80, I will be fail. so that is not fair. one thing as I mentioned above I have not experience in functional programming may be I will lose the functional programming question so should I fail because of that question. so it is not fair »
- Less ambiguous exam, cover more in each lecture, make the exercises mandatory.»
- The 8:30 lecture *yawn*»
- None.»
- functional programming»
- need proper assignment submission every week with points and written exam marks allotment(compulsary get 6 marks for each)»
- The exam system. »

18. Additional comments

- Thanks!»
- nothing»
- Good literature and examination. Assignments and feedback is useful.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.85
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.85
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.46

Kursutvärderingssystem från